It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

IF the worlds Wealth was divided FAIRly

page: 1
11
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:36 AM
link   
HI guys
A question to you guys . If the worlds total wealth was divided by the worlds total population , how much wealth would each person have ?
I ask this because i want too know if wealth was distributed fairly could we ALL live a prosperous life ?
Is the wealth really held by a few elite families? , rockerfellers rothchilds royal familily etc ?

My 2nd question is if the worlds total land was shared equally , how much land would each person have ?
Again I believe the Queen of England owns a huge amount of land as do other elites . , the slaves never got the "40 acres" they were promised ! , land and wealth are two crucial elements that are not disributed fairly imo and this is why as the old saying goes , the rich get richer , the poor get poorer . I beleive land and wealth are necessary for tptb to maintain the status quo and thats it part of the nwo conspiracy .

Thanks .
edit on 4-2-2011 by TheGhostViking because: (no reason given)



+14 more 
posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:44 AM
link   
If the worlds wealth and land were divided equally then each person would have equal except some people would be more equal than others .I believe its called communism and has been tried before.
edit on 4-2-2011 by 12voltz because: of the constant rain



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:47 AM
link   
Chances are that every one would be in an equal amount of debt



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:47 AM
link   
reply to post by TheGhostViking
 


sharing the wealth equally to every person on the planet would be like setting everybodys bank accounts to zero.

the money that was shared out would suddenly become worthless, and probably cause insane amounts of inflation


edit on 4-2-2011 by MR BOB because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:48 AM
link   
reply to post by TheGhostViking
 


It really depends on what you define as wealth.

If your talking about that worthless paper money then its unlimited. (FIAT currency)
If your talking about valuable metals such as Gold or Silver....who knows...who knows how much has really been pulled from the surface of the planet. I think it was estimated at 50k tons of gold over history...but clearly thats rubbish.



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:49 AM
link   
If the wealth were divided equally, everyone would have an annual income of US$10,571.

$74 trillion annual global GDP divided by a population of ~7 billion

Simple.



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
If the wealth were divided equally, everyone would have an annual income of US$10,571.

$74 trillion annual global GDP divided by a population of ~7 billion

Simple.


But fiat currency has no backing and is worthless bits of paper....the fed can print $100 trillion dollars if they wanted tomorrow...then another $500 trillion a day later.
Wealth can only really be calculated by valuable resources...paper money isnt worth the paper its printed on



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:51 AM
link   
Well there is 6.8 billion people on Earth, and Trillons of pounds / dollars / francs / yen etc etc etc, so I would imagine everyone would live comfortably if it was distibuted evenly.
edit on 4/2/11 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:52 AM
link   
reply to post by TheGhostViking
 


Have you see 'Zeitgeist - Moving forward'?

This will give you a good idea of how much money there is to go round, and ways to sort it out.

As it says in the film, the money to pay off depts is none existent, there is no money to pay off depts!

So no-one will ever be dept free



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by roguesoul
reply to post by TheGhostViking
 


Have you see 'Zeitgeist - Moving forward'?

This will give you a good idea of how much money there is to go round, and ways to sort it out.

As it says in the film, the money to pay off depts is none existent, there is no money to pay off depts!

So no-one will ever be dept free





Exactly....fiat currency.

They print $1000 dollars....and add interest....but never print it (the interest)....so it can never be paid back



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 05:58 AM
link   
see your missing the point
I dont want to hear why it cant be done i said IF it could be done .
imo it is a joke that the Queen and other disgustingly rich elites live like gods while children are DYING because they have no food ! THIS is why im asking the question , to see What the people deserve, not the elites ! .

To the guy that talked about debt .
money is a nwo scam
When you realise how a bank is ALLOWED to operate you will realise that talking about money in terms of debt and credit is pointless .Banks basically have a licence to CREATE money as do the Federal Reserve and then charge the Us government INTEREST!
Money is a scam and the nwos intention was always to make you slaves to their lovely invention DEBT and credit



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:00 AM
link   
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
 


Thankyou fox lol , like you say easy lol .



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:07 AM
link   
Thankyou guys This is what i wanted
thnx for these replies
yes ive seen zeitgest , and i have also done my own research because im sick of the rich eugenic promoting scum that run our world who say ...
Theres a crisis , stop havin kids, blame immigrants ,lower your carbon footprint . EVEN though massive companies piss all over the earth its APPARENTLY my fault , hmmmmm
TPTB want you to blame everyone but THEM for this
divide and conquer .


+1 more 
posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:12 AM
link   
Define "fairly" please.

If by "fairly" you mean I get to keep what I work my butt off for, then I would have as much as I earn. No more no less.

Communism does not work and never will. What works is a sense of self worth, hard work, and self preservation.



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by loves a conspiricy

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
If the wealth were divided equally, everyone would have an annual income of US$10,571.

$74 trillion annual global GDP divided by a population of ~7 billion

Simple.


But fiat currency has no backing and is worthless bits of paper....the fed can print $100 trillion dollars if they wanted tomorrow...then another $500 trillion a day later.
Wealth can only really be calculated by valuable resources...paper money isnt worth the paper its printed on


GDP is counted on value of total trade goods and services. And "the fed" doesn't have anything to do with the price of tea in China; literally. Don't get me started on the problems of gold.



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:13 AM
link   
I think that some people would spend the wealth wisely, and some people stupidly. Then the people who were stupid with it would ask for wealth distribution again. In the end the wealth distributed equally would approach a value of 0.
edit on 4-2-2011 by 547000 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
If the wealth were divided equally, everyone would have an annual income of US$10,571.

$74 trillion annual global GDP divided by a population of ~7 billion

Simple.
Hey that's not too bad because the average yearly salary worldwide is about 7000. Sounds like a pay increase for a lot of people. Pretty pathetic isn't it.



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by DonnaLynn
Define "fairly" please.

If by "fairly" you mean I get to keep what I work my butt off for, then I would have as much as I earn. No more no less.

Communism does not work and never will. What works is a sense of self worth, hard work, and self preservation.




Who is talking about communism but you ? you must have that response programmed in .

you work hard ? great ? but does that mean you dont care about kids that are dying? , kids who could live on what we throw away and waste
Forgive me but your attitude is very ott .



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:23 AM
link   
Fair would be the non-working lazy alcoholic down the street gets what he earns when he bothers to search for gainful employment. And in turn I get what I earn if I choose to work everyday. Any other way is unfair (as much as I hate that word) and would result in a world filled with folks that are more than happy to live off the fruits of other's labors.

Wanting more in life is what drives people to be productive and contribute. If everyone gets the same thing no matter what, why bother to do anything?



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by willie9696

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
If the wealth were divided equally, everyone would have an annual income of US$10,571.

$74 trillion annual global GDP divided by a population of ~7 billion

Simple.
Hey that's not too bad because the average yearly salary worldwide is about 7000. Sounds like a pay increase for a lot of people. Pretty pathetic isn't it.



EXACTLY the ONLY people who wouldn't be happy with that are the rich ass holes who are greedy pigs.
id take a lower wage or whatever if it meant NOONE went hungry .




top topics



 
11
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join