It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HoldTheBeans
Lot of fools running around lately.
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
Originally posted by hp1229
Well. Not according to Global Post article. See the link below. Egypt is one of the largest arab nation population wise. It also controls the SUEZ canal which is of strategic and economic progress for the rest of the Arab Countries.
GOLDEN LAND
I mean in regards to Israel's strategy.
Originally posted by hp1229
Well with respect to that then definitely it is not.
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
Originally posted by hp1229
True but do you think we (USA) will be one of them? What about China or Russia? That will be interesting to see and will drive the political scene for the next few decades in the region.
I've come to the conclusion that most nations are puppet states, with most of the middle east being some of the exception.edit on 3-2-2011 by drkylefletcher because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
Originally posted by hp1229
Well with respect to that then definitely it is not.
How so?
Originally posted by hp1229
No No. What I meant to say earlier is that will US be one of the influential country going forward in the Middle East or will it be the Russians or Chinese?
Originally posted by illuminnaughty
reply to post by HoldTheBeans
So that they can get a war going for israel. Have israel surrounded by muslims who wont talk to the zionists. Then they can sell lots of weapons and bombs. Spread a little freedom and democracy arround the ME. Lots of money to be made. Might even get the chance to loot oil or any thing else they want, like they did in iraq.
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
Originally posted by hp1229
Well with respect to that then definitely it is not.
How so?
Sorry for my incomplete sentences. With respect to Israel's motive for Lebanon, Egypt is definitely not the golden land.
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
Originally posted by hp1229
Well with respect to that then definitely it is not.
How so?
Sorry for my incomplete sentences. With respect to Israel's motive for Lebanon, Egypt is definitely not the golden land.
I'm sorry, it seems we're getting off track, I'll try to slow down with replies (too much caffeine).
I meant to say that Palestine is the golden land to Israel, and weakening Palestine with people leaving to help/flock to the nations in unrest is wise for Israel's defense/ territory conquering (too aggressive of a word choice but no better comes to mind currently) strategy.
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
Originally posted by hp1229
No No. What I meant to say earlier is that will US be one of the influential country going forward in the Middle East or will it be the Russians or Chinese?
I'm not ruling out the possibility that the communist nations are sovereign, but it certainly seems to me the democratic nations are playing on the same side as the Russians and Chinese, and the money ultimately goes to the same place that isn't the massive amount of running costs. (I know that last statement will be misconstrued by some, but I refuse to come out and say exactly what I mean by that).edit on 3-2-2011 by drkylefletcher because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by hp1229
Thanks for the link. So the riots in Tunisia, spurred a coillition of people already angry at the Egyptian government, created an oppourtunity.
I just have to wonder about the motivation for some who spurred this movement in Egypt. While some/many may be altruistic, my spidey senses are tingling as to the motives of some.
edit on 3-2-2011 by beezzer because: tyupo
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
reply to post by hp1229
I find it strangely coincidental economic policies seem to be balancing between nations of the world.
So, yes.edit on 3-2-2011 by drkylefletcher because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hp1229
Which post are you responding to ? i'm sorry but i've been going back n forth several threads on ATS
Originally posted by hp1229
In other words...'Meet the new boss...same as the old boss' NWO ?
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
Originally posted by hp1229
Which post are you responding to ? i'm sorry but i've been going back n forth several threads on ATS
Originally posted by hp1229
In other words...'Meet the new boss...same as the old boss' NWO ?
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
I'm gonna take a wild guess that maybe the CIA had something to do with the uprising in Egypt.
Edit: Let me clarify that I'm stating the possibility.edit on 3-2-2011 by drkylefletcher because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
I'm gonna take a wild guess that maybe the CIA had something to do with the uprising in Egypt.
Edit: Let me clarify that I'm stating the possibility.edit on 3-2-2011 by drkylefletcher because: (no reason given)
100% definitely not...as horrible as Mubarak was, he was doing exactly what the US wanted him to do. Why on earth would they want to remove him? Can't be because of human rights as they tolerated and paid his torture regime for 30+ years now...
Originally posted by hp1229
The truth of the matter is that Mubaarak's son is/was not interested in running his country of Egypt. TPTB needed a new face/successor to Mubaarak (who is also someone with a military background and was picked by military). This will be going on for a while and eventually it will be filled with another puppet. The rioters will go back to their homes once they get their butt kicked around a bit in the prisons by secret police and the puppet masters. Eventually the media will slow the coverage down or twist the story completely all around and all over the world that it will be forgotten just before the new face is put in place
Originally posted by drkylefletcher
I'm gonna take a wild guess that maybe the CIA had something to do with the uprising in Egypt.
Edit: Let me clarify that I'm stating the possibility.edit on 3-2-2011 by drkylefletcher because: (no reason given)