reply to post by hootlj
Are you Linda Moulton Howe by any chance? You sure do remind me of her. You seem to tip toe around proof of it being a hoax just like she does on
every other hoax. coughdronecough
This here is absolute proof that video 1 (the video that started it all and which came out first) is CGI:
1: We can rule out lens artifact because the mirrored edges moves independently from the viewport. Any lens artifact would be locked in place with the
2: We can rule out film flaw, because there is no known film flaw that would mirror the scene in such a way as to create two perfect mirrors in a 90
degree angle, and move with the camera shake independently from the viewport.
3: We can rule out compression or data artifacts because there is no known series of events that could cause a perfect mirror of data which also moves
with the camera shake independently from the viewport. Video is a series of images, which are a series of pixels, which are a series of bytes, in a
specific order. There is no known artifact that could mirror bytes of data and move those bytes of data in unison with the visual movement of the
image. The movement of the camera is not visible by looking at the bytes of data, as they are just random numbers. Only humans can perceive the
movement, so there is no reason for the mirrored bytes of data to be able to move with the camera independently from the viewport in a 90 degree angle
with straight edges.
4: There is no reason for anyone or anything to add the mirror effect to a legit video. There is no accidental way to do it either without knowing.
Video 1 without a doubt has been digitally altered.
There is only one explainable function/algorithm that would mirror the data in such a way
that is follows the movement of the camera and is independent form the viewport, and creates straight edges at a 90 degree angle. That is the motion
tile effect set to mirror edges which is applied to the edges of a video which is being moved on the X and Y axis, and rotated on the Z axis, to
create fake camera movement.
Video 1 (the video that started it all) is FAKE. This means video 2 is FAKE because the two are linked.
Both video 1 and video 2 also have many issues with lighting, and sound....
Video 3 is proven to be fake, and the picture used to fake it was found.
Video 4 has also been found to have many anomalies. Fake camera shake, fake motion blur, and fake lighting. Video 4 not only shows the same "red
dots in the sky" as video 1, but also has the same advantage point (a full view of the city from a high place). Both videos have similar timing,
lighting, vantage point, and effects such as fake camera shake. Video 1 and 2 and 4 are created by the same person.
ALL THE VIDEOS ARE FAKE.
All of the above can be confirmed if you study it and understand it your self. There is no way to refute it, if you think there is, go ahead and
edit on 11-2-2011 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)