It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO over Jerusalem: CONFIRMED HOAX

page: 126
216
<< 123  124  125    127  128  129 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Paradigm2012
 


So you think this dark mirrored image is of that hotel eh?



You are speaking about the Hotel Inbal.

Notice it is lit up every night and bright as any other well-lit landmark in Jerusalem should be.

Why is it so dark in where you say it is in the UFO clip?





And why does it have two identical glowing mickey mouse ears in the UFO clip? There is plainly no such thing behind the hotel in the day or night pics of said hotel.

Would you also like to see that the hotel is nowhere near where you say it is in the UFO clip?

Or are you gunna come clean?

MM




posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 11:54 AM
link   
Hello, everyone. I have just looked over the videos again. This has been brought up before but I believe it bears repeating. 23 seconds. In all three videos the light blob parks over the dome for 23 seconds. Do you not find it strange the the camera man in #4 manages to get exactly the 23 seconds that the thing is parked over the dome?
Also think of this. When was the last time you turned your cell cam or flip or whatever in a hurry. Consider that there is zero shaking on the part of camera guy. No fumbling or shaking. The image just appears for the precise 23 seconds. So shouldn't Pee Pee Man and the girl be pointing upwards and gesticulating and gawking? If not, why. Pee Pee Man and the Girl are at the wall for 43 seconds! Pee Pee Man is there for 28 of those seconds. Look where he is looking. He should be looking up.
Also, just because I have the stats.... In video 1 it takes the blob 33 seconds to descend to the dome. In video 2 it takes 18 seconds but in video 1 we see that the guy is holding up his cam anyway. Did it take 15 seconds for the phone's software to come up? And was he just standing there watching the phone do this without struggling with it a little. All of this is off guys. It is a hoax



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 11:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jeremiah Johnson
I don't know if this has been posted if so I apologize, but to just add to the intrigue read this. Maybe it's baby Jesus lol.

www.haaretz.com...


Monday wouldve been today (remember they are ahead of us by about 12 hrs) or the 30th, the sighting happened on the early morning of the 28th.

Not connected unless that baby sat at one of the most well visited sites in jerusalem for 2 to 9 days unnoticed....
edit on 7-2-2011 by DeboWilliams because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 11:58 AM
link   
reply to post by DeboWilliams
 


Debo, they were preparing the child underground for one week. We cannot guess at how long this may have taken once the lightship initiated the gestation process.



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:02 PM
link   
reply to post by DeboWilliams
 


C'mon, don't you have just an ounce of jest in you? Didn't you realize I posted that as a bit of a joke? Do you really think I thought it was baby Jesus? I'm nutty but I'm not that crazy.



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Frater210
Hello, everyone. I have just looked over the videos again. This has been brought up before but I believe it bears repeating. 23 seconds. In all three videos the light blob parks over the dome for 23 seconds. Do you not find it strange the the camera man in #4 manages to get exactly the 23 seconds that the thing is parked over the dome?
Also think of this. When was the last time you turned your cell cam or flip or whatever in a hurry. Consider that there is zero shaking on the part of camera guy. No fumbling or shaking. The image just appears for the precise 23 seconds. So shouldn't Pee Pee Man and the girl be pointing upwards and gesticulating and gawking? If not, why. Pee Pee Man and the Girl are at the wall for 43 seconds! Pee Pee Man is there for 28 of those seconds. Look where he is looking. He should be looking up.
Also, just because I have the stats.... In video 1 it takes the blob 33 seconds to descend to the dome. In video 2 it takes 18 seconds but in video 1 we see that the guy is holding up his cam anyway. Did it take 15 seconds for the phone's software to come up? And was he just standing there watching the phone do this without struggling with it a little. All of this is off guys. It is a hoax


To add to this, actually the guy seen recording video 2 has been holding the camera up for about 45 seconds before actually recording anything. If you go to eligaels youtube channel, he uploaded 2 videos, 1 is like 1:30, the other is 2:12 minutes long. And in the longer one, the guy whose seen recording video 2, has been holding the camera up for about 45 seconds before his video actually starts (you can compare this by checking out one of the syncronized compilation videos)

Holds it up to the sky for 45 seconds, never fumbles with it to turn it on.

So either 2 things, he cut the video and didnt upload it
Or hes not actually recording anything.



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jeremiah Johnson
reply to post by DeboWilliams
 


C'mon, don't you have just an ounce of jest in you? Didn't you realize I posted that as a bit of a joke? Do you really think I thought it was baby Jesus? I'm nutty but I'm not that crazy.


I figured you was joking but couldnt be sure, but man if youve been following this thread youll see that people had said even sillier stuff, and actually meant it lol



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:06 PM
link   
reply to post by DeboWilliams
 

Lol I bet. I started reading it when it first began but haven't been back since today, I haven't had time to catch up on it but I'll read what I can.



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Jeremiah Johnson
 


No. It's hilarious. And a Primo catch. That's entertainment!



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mr Mask
And why does it have two identical glowing mickey mouse ears in the UFO clip?








posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:19 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


Damn...I forgot to edit out that UFO.

Gee thanks, traitor...when the mother ship arrives, I'm telling them to give your seat to Debo.

MM



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:20 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


Shoa! Zorgon, what is that. And couldn't the Mickey ears be that building with the lit facade on either side of it in the upper left of the hotel?



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:20 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 

good one now for the rebuttal it is a leans glare no it is a reflection oh wait it is a bug no it is a a um a give me one .... oh yea mars. did i cover it all???



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by Mr Mask
And why does it have two identical glowing mickey mouse ears in the UFO clip?







Nice photoshop on the ears.




edit on 7-2-2011 by faustus because: wrong thread.

edit on 7-2-2011 by faustus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Mr Mask
 


Nice one Mask..

I don't think he can claim it is that hotel anymore, but I do think he might try.



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:47 PM
link   
When I saw this vid, I thought ' Finally something that might be real...'
coz I'm usually let down by UFO vids

I'm one of those that knows they're out there but I am not to sure if they're here now, or even that the aliens we choose as usual suspects, the grays, even exist. I think they were just imagination, dream, hallucination... on another thought, maybe that's were they exist
I'll stop now


Basicly, I've been let down again. (I'm 99.9% sure)
reply to post by roughycannon
 

I found this (it looks really dodgy on their page) from ninemsn.com.au but they seem good enough. HERE'S the LINK

And sceptics will also point to a more general trend made clear by the latest archives. In 1995, there were 117 UFO sightings reported to authorities, but this spiked to 609 in 1996, according to the MoD reports, released after a three-year project with the National Archives. "It's evident there is some connection between newspaper stories, TV programs and films about alien visitors and the numbers of UFO sightings reported," said UFO expert and journalism lecturer David Clarke. "Aside from 1996, one of the busiest years for UFO sightings reported to the MoD over the past half century was 1978 - the year Close Encounters of the Third Kind was released," added Clarke.


roughycannon, I don't think this UFO vid is viral campaigning. As one poster noted, it would be a public relations nightmare. I think it's a hoax. I still wait for the real thing... (cue X-files theme) When movies, or media or other material, containing UFO's and ET's are publicly released they tend to cause outbreaks of sightings. Bad example, but, when I was 10 I saw the Columbia tether incident and I thought it was a UFO

Another bad example; after playing too much of the space stage in Spore, (lame I know) I thought I heard a UFO outside. When I went out, I could here it from a specific direction, behind the tree line. As if it where landing. Needless to say It kept me spooked and entertained for a minute or two



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 12:58 PM
link   


So your admitting that the hotel is there and is located exactly were you are using that pixelated cellphone video to prove it. Look at how the lights angle up perfectly with the hotel.

And your GIF clip is too short and could be pixelated compression artifact



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 01:00 PM
link   
Your micro second GIF clip SHOWS NOTHING other than pixelated youtube video.


edit on 7-2-2011 by Paradigm2012 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 01:09 PM
link   
reply to post by gift0fpr0phecy
 


I looked at that video again. I noticed that the mirror effect only happens after the flash and the camera moves up into the sky making sharp right moves. Why doesn't the mirror effect happen on the smaller shakes?



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 01:14 PM
link   
Please provide evidence of a hoax, you have yet to answer my question. Every thing you talk about as evidence for a hoax has been proven incorrect.



new topics

top topics



 
216
<< 123  124  125    127  128  129 >>

log in

join