Roosevelt Was Assasinated By the C.I.A. for Refusial to Nuke Japan

That is the testimony by this man who disclosed this to the FBI

1. Files and papers on the assassinations of two Presidents of the United States. Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy. Roosevelt was assassinated because he refused to authorize the nuking of civilian cities in Japan and was going to except their surrender without destroying any of their cities with the new atomic bombs, which were being used to threaten the Russian's with that we were willing to use our new weapon on civilian populations with total disregard to civilian casualties or human life. Japan already lay in ruins and was defeated as a nation. Japan was to be taken in tack as a prize of war and then owned by the United States and none of it was to be shared with the Russians or anyone else. John Kennedy was assassinated because he refused to complete the overthrow of Cuba with America troops. Kennedy believed that the overthrow of Castro had to be done by Cuban's not by the conquering power of the United States. After the CIA had set up President Kennedy at the Bay of Pigs he vowed to destroy the CIA. Later John Kennedy was preparing to remove the advisors from Vietnam and this again was a CIA war for the Rockefeller family who needed the natural resources of Vietnam for their world- wide corporate empire expansion. Kennedy was assassinated to stop him from stopping the war in Vietnam and to stop him from destroying the CIA.

Here is a link to the complete story

rigorousintuition.yuku.com...-35564

Read it and let me know how you feel about what he says

Roosevelt died before the CIA was an organization...
And he was very sick for a long time.
Not buying that.

So.

Someone, who allowed the mass firebombing of civilian cities in Japan, and Germany, was assasinated for not allowing a bombing of a city with a nuke?

As has been said, not buying it.

reply to post by seagull


Especially since Roosevelt was the one who early on decided this was a necessary program, and kept close tabs on when he would be able to unleash his new weapon.

CIA - created by the National Security Act of 1947

Roosevelt - died in 1945

Time warp needed.

Originally posted by Truth1000
reply to post by seagull

 

Especially since Roosevelt was the one who early on decided this was a necessary program, and kept close tabs on when he would be able to unleash his new weapon.

CIA - created by the National Security Act of 1947

Roosevelt - died in 1945

Time warp needed.

Ok did you read the article cause it's not necessaraly the CIA, according to the testimony but the powers that be in general, even if it was before the CIA was officially formed, He means the same organization of people. The NWO, CFR whatever they went by at the time

And I don't necessaraly believe everything that Charles Schlund claims, although alot of his aqusations has been coming to light lately as being true. Read the Article you'll see what I mean

This conspiracy theory has the merit of passing my first test.

1. If it's a conspiracy no one should know about it.

After reading the article though,
this guy covers pages of conspiracy
lists tons of names, and seems to be commenting
on everything the public has been shown on TV since the 70's.

For instance the Manson murders in california were, as he says,
"a plot by the CIA to portray all these flower girls as evil." Which brings
me to my second rule of conspiracy theories.

2. How is this theory trying to appeal to me on an emotional level.

And by that rule it fails categorically. Every single line is an emotional appeal.
There are plenty of specific names, and testimony to having seen documentation,
but it spends most of it's time discussing emotional cause and effect, painting a picture
of twitchy easily offended government that likes to squash opposition like bugs, all while admitting
the copious amount of drugs that were around during this mans life. This is demagogery not evidence.


David Grouchy

This is ridiculous, but all bite...

Pity "they", always one of those around here, didn't kill that bastard a couple of years sooner. America would have been free from his "socialist" experiments, and millions of American's wouldn't have died, or have their lives ruined, in an unnecessary war.

Reflecting the views of some posts above mine, I seriously doubt that this psychopath would even contemplate not mass-murdering other helpless civilians, after all that was his favorite pass-time, as his "trophy room" clearly shows.

reply to post by davidgrouchy


That's cool and I understand what you mean, also thank you for taking time to read the article, you see I knew Chuck personally, not closely but I met him several times, and I don't know what to think of him, or I should say didn't know, he passed away a year ago, now he kinda sounds like a nut job, but he was a very wealthy man, master electrician and aside from all of this, ecspecially the implant thing, he was very normal.

Originally posted by pirhanna
Roosevelt died before the CIA was an organization...
And he was very sick for a long time.
Not buying that.

Roosevelt was assassinated by the OSS (the CIA's predecessor)?

The globalists decided to install 33rd degree Freemason Harry S. Truman as president so that they could nuke Hiroshima 33 days after the 169th Independence Day.

1945 - 1776 = 169

Square root of 169 = 13

July 4 and August 6 are 33 days apart.

13 and 33 are favorite Masonic numbers...

Coincidence or not?

reply to post by ironfalcon


Very nice, I like it I'll have to research the OSS alittle more, thank you

Ummmm,, if my history is correct but we did nuke Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki as the A Bomb was the most advanced weapon on the planet, although small and wimpy by today's standards it had the power to level a small city and both are about the size of a San Fransisco, Ca and a Miami, Fl. Imagine if both were to be hit at least downtown of both would be wiped clean off the map.

I have not heard this theory before and frankly it doesn't have much to support it. Roosevelt's health was not good the last year of his life and he didn't oppose the use of the bomb on Japan before he died that I knew of. The OSS, on the other hand, did engage in assassination of Americans (the guy who was sent to hit Patton confessed that a veteran's reunion some time back). I think story was very credible, so I know it's not outside the realm of whoever is in charge of covert ops (the OSS in this case) to move against their perceived enemies in America. I haven't seen any evidence that Roosevelt wouldn't have used the bomb though, so it makes a bit hard to believe.