NEW - 4th Video of Jerusalem UFO Surfaces!

page: 1
62
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 1 2011 @ 11:39 PM
link   
NOTICE: This older topic has been supplanted by a much-larger more active discussion thread with excellent detailed analysis on each of the four "Jerusalem UFO" videos released. For more details, visit the topic below:

HOAX UFO over Jerusalem


 





ADMIN NOTE: As the source of this video has been linked to a well known ufo hoaxer, the thread has been moved to the hoax forum.


Wow! "A fourth video of the Jerusalem event has surfaced. This video was supposedly taken by a group of Israelis visiting the Old City of Jerusalem.
The footage appears more convincing than the third clip: However the commentary by the witnesses might be regarded by some as somewhat lacking authenticity.
But then who really knows how people sound and react when they see a UFO?"

IMO, this video looks more convincing than the first two, Any thoughts?


edit on 1-2-2011 by discl0sur3 because: (no reason given)
edit on 2-2-2011 by Crakeur because: (no reason given)
edit on 9-2-2011 by SkepticOverlord because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 1 2011 @ 11:40 PM
link   
Come on now, this looks incredibly fake to me.



posted on Feb, 1 2011 @ 11:45 PM
link   
I am so "on the fence" with this occurrence, I can't add anything to this...It's frustrating my girlfriend however

I will wait this one out...
keeps me coming back, for what it's worth.



posted on Feb, 1 2011 @ 11:51 PM
link   
This is becoming its own mini series
do you have any links to the local news
there, that aired the same footage of
this? even If this event truly happened
It would dominate Newspapers and media
alike.
edit on 1-2-2011 by Jophiel because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 1 2011 @ 11:53 PM
link   
Norio Hayakawa prooved this is all a hoax on his website

edit on 1-2-2011 by theRiverGoddess because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 1 2011 @ 11:57 PM
link   
I've said it before and I'll say it again,
It has been debunked!!!!!!

How do I know??
Because everydamn thing on this website has been debunked.
A UFO could land on the White House lawn and be filmed in High Definition,stay for three weeks,
little green men could come out and have tea with the President with the whole world watching LIVE and SOME A-HOLE on ATS would say it has been debunked.

Actually I think this is great footage
S&F for bringing it to my attention.
Just a little hard to enjoy because "THEY" will be here soon.

edit to add...guess I was too late.
"THEY" arrived sooner than expected.
edit on 1-2-2011 by Screwed because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by theRiverGoddess
 


am I missing something? Your video does not match the op's video.



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:03 AM
link   
edit on 2-2-2011 by theRiverGoddess because: (no reason given)



well if the first one in this 'series' is fully proven a hoax does it not go without saying that ALL of these are a hoax??

Why would they hoax 2 vids and yet the 3rd one is actually real......I mean really??? ya think?
edit on 2-2-2011 by theRiverGoddess because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:05 AM
link   


The Parallax issue has been debunked!

There is no Parallax issue!

Watch the above video!

Hoaxkiller1 could not kill any hoax because its 100% REAL
edit on 2/2/2011 by Sauron because: embed video



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by Paradigm2012


The Parallax issue has been debunked!

There is no Parallax issue!

Watch the above video!

Hoaxkiller1 could not kill any hoax because its 100% REAL


Agreed....NOTHING has been proven either way thus far!
edit on 2-2-2011 by discl0sur3 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:07 AM
link   
Could the Utah sighting and the Jerusalem sighting both be related? Both display red lights in formation, the Utah sighting shows it dropping a white light, as is the same here.. but the white light returns to the red lights.



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:07 AM
link   
This one certainly looks more convincing than the 3rd one, that's obvious. What stood out to me was the light reflecting off the dome...that *could* be real, and certainly the effect is nice, but I imagine that it *could* also be done with after effects.

Also, the city lights had me for a moment...again, just like the 3rd video with the tourists, no flickering or changing of the lights, BUT if you notice towards the bottom, a car is moving along the street, so that part looks at least passable.

The flash...not coming from the "thing" this time either, so it matches up with the first 2 videos (whether that's good or bad I haven't yet decided.)

I think, if this is to be debunked, it's gonna be with the light reflecting off the dome. It just looks too circular and perfect to be natural. But then again, if this thing is real it obviously isn't natural...



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:07 AM
link   
I'm liking the fact that multiple videos are surfacing now, but the problem that I initially had with them is that they were all shot from the same vantage point it seemed. I was thinking maybe someone had created the 2nd video from the stock footage of the first one. But now we have this video with a much closer perspective.

The other issue for me is that I'm left with a feeling of CGI from the flash and subsequent motion of the object shooting skyward. It's a "footage is too good to be true" scenario. Then again no one yet has shown proof of video manipulation. Has anyone started video analysis on these yet?

Lastly, where are the news articles following an event such as this? I've found none. With it occurring at that particular location, and it being heavily populated, surely numerous persons were witness to it. Wouldn't at least one news agency do a write up on this and interview some witnesses?

It would be really interesting to see additional footage surface.

It'd be killer if someone with the skill set, and if they were so inclined, would do some basic video analysis on all of the videos.

Pz.
edit on 2-2-2011 by susp3kt because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by nwdogg1982
This one certainly looks more convincing than the 3rd one, that's obvious. What stood out to me was the light reflecting off the dome...that *could* be real, and certainly the effect is nice, but I imagine that it *could* also be done with after effects.

Also, the city lights had me for a moment...again, just like the 3rd video with the tourists, no flickering or changing of the lights, BUT if you notice towards the bottom, a car is moving along the street, so that part looks at least passable.

The flash...not coming from the "thing" this time either, so it matches up with the first 2 videos (whether that's good or bad I haven't yet decided.)

I think, if this is to be debunked, it's gonna be with the light reflecting off the dome. It just looks too circular and perfect to be natural. But then again, if this thing is real it obviously isn't natural...


The dome reflection was my area of interest as well. Watch closely as the object accelerates, the luminesence on the globe is consistent with it's movement IMO. Also, this video actually has moving traffic



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:14 AM
link   
i would like to see or know were is the 3rd video???? this one WOW at 0:22 you can catch the flash , go to 0:18 and start, pause play as fast as you can, WOW!!!!!S$F



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:19 AM
link   
Damn that's fast, never see nothing like that before



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:23 AM
link   
reply to post by bekod
 


Yeah, the flash is VERY interesting. I actually think I caught 2 separate flashes...they happen almost simultaneously, but there is maybe 1 or 2 frames where the flash goes away, then the next frame everything gets extremely bright. Maybe it was just the camera compensating for the extra light, or the hoaxers missing a frame...not sure.

About that stop/start on youtube...when are they gonna implement a framestep right into the player? It couldn't really be that hard could it? Plus it would make all the ufo vids alot easier to dissect
edit on 2-2-2011 by nwdogg1982 because: grammar



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:24 AM
link   
so here we have a third video
this one from a completly different angles
can any one "sync" the four videos?
xploder



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:25 AM
link   
So what do you guys think? Utah and Jerusalem sightings related?
thenextweb.com...



posted on Feb, 2 2011 @ 12:28 AM
link   
If you watch closely, the double flash seen just before the "ufo" takes off like the Millenium Falcon is generated from the centre of the image. Or just to the right of the "anomoly". {Watch the footage over and over from the flash point.}


Also note how the lense flare of the bright object does not follow the ascension of the object but merely vanishes as it begins to exit the cameras view.
edit on 2/2/11 by spearhead because: to add
edit on 2/2/11 by spearhead because: spell check
edit on 2/2/11 by spearhead because: again....





new topics
top topics
 
62
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join