It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
No disrespect man but the big bang is kind of old science by now! If you believe in the multiverse and white holes then it is "easy" to understand that a black hole collapses into itself and creates a white hole(BIG BANG) within the 11 dimensional multiverse, thus setting up a new universe.
Remember all space-time points are interconnected and can be warped?
That is what worm-holes and stargates are theoretically based on. Antimatter is the antithesis of matter(negative energy) and can be theoretically used to shrink space-time ahead of you, thus pulling you ahead at faster than light speed.
Who created the multiverse and matter? In my opinion god!
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
My response would be; "The problem of evil" if you are to say "God" is good or "GOD" is what we associate with the concept of "Good" and God is creator, God is the creator of all good AND all evil.
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
The Euthyphro dilemma is found in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro, in which Socrates asks Euthyphro: "Is the pious (τὸ ὅσιον) loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" (10a)
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
The dilemma has had a major effect on the philosophical theism of the monotheistic religions, but in a modified form: "Is what is morally good commanded by God because it is morally good, or is it morally good because it is commanded by God?" This question has presented a problem for theists ever since Plato's original discussion, and it continues to be an object of theological and philosophical discussion today.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
...I never said the Big Bang didn't happen, I said that the claim that 'nothing' proceeded the Big Bang is incorrect. And the ideas you put out are hypothetical, not proven. The Big Bang is proven.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
What do you mean? You mean by gravity? What you said doesn't really have a specific meanings per say...
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
...no, antimatter isn't negative energy...the result of antimatter and matter combining would be energy. And the only methods that have been theoretically devised that can warp spacetime ahead of an object would still require insanely high levels of energy.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
Well, there's no evidence of anything beyond our universe...but why did matter have to be created? What remains is nothing more than an unsubstantiated opinion and an understanding of science that might be better tempered with some actual research into what you're talking about..
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
So your saying there is ONLY ONE universe...that created by OUR big bang?
How is that proven more than the multiverse theory and the existance of multiple white holes?
And what is gravity? Is it not a form of electromagneticism we pretend not to understand? Isn't almost everything based on electromagneticism? Are there any exceptions to this rule? Sorry for my loaded questions....
Correct! I should have said negative matter rather than negative energy. Negative matter + positive matter = Energy
I did not come up with these theories on my own, if that is what you are insinuating.
Everything has already been postulated by science and some theories are more acceptable than others.
Maybe you should look into them more and worry less about correcting my "limited understanding" of the topic.
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
Even if the God of Deism or any Theism existed, i wouldn't worship it.
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
reply to post by adjensen
So do you or don't you believe in Hell if you choose to disobey any man-made religion? (i.e. neglect "GOD")
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
reply to post by adjensen
Do you consider me a sinner for my belief structure?
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
I have no concerns with the Deism position, i have few qualms with this belief as theres no hysterical dogma attached to the belief system.
So what is your position? Belief in a deity (Deism) or belief in a specific description of the deity (Theism)?
religious hallucinations and visions
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
reply to post by Lucifer777
religious hallucinations and visions
Describe a "religious" hallucination as opposed to just as regular hallucination.
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
reply to post by Lucifer777
Thanks for responding; that's very interesting. I can't say i've had any vivid hallucination or visions while under the influence of any drug i've taken. Mind i've been limited to marijuana, coke and even ecstasy. (not exactly the most " "Hallucinogenic" line-up i admit) I never was brave enough to intoxicate myself with '___' or Mushrooms. I definetly would say i've had some "spiritual" experiences on Ecstasy and MDMA though.
Did this demon you speak of come from your personal fears? Or was it a conjuring of your mind, (free from bias or previous experience) Maybe this vision came from your sub-concious fears or worries regarding devils, spirits or demons and such?
Do you have any metaphysical belief? Spirit world's, dimensional beings, afterlife etc. etc. etc.?