It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bogomil
A kind of cosmic McCarthy'ism then? But how can you be sure, that you're siding with the good guys?
Originally posted by bogomil
You relate to a cosmic scope, and let one confused and self-contradictory book be your manual on cosmic ethics.
Originally posted by bogomil
And redemption doctrine then, where does that fit in?
God exists.
God is omnipresent, God is everywhere.
God is omnipotent, God is all knowing and all powerful
God is Omnibenevolent, God is all loving.
Originally posted by Condemned0625
I don't know. You should be honest and admit that you don't know as well. Saying things like "My god is this, my god is that" and "God exists!" is NOT proof. You're just babbling about it because you believe it.
Originally posted by Condemned0625
Why don't you accept any of the other gods?
Originally posted by Condemned0625
Why do you make a special exception for yours?
Originally posted by Condemned0625
You agree that evidence does not exist for the others, but you claim there is evidence for yours?
Originally posted by Condemned0625
Nonsense. Your god concept is in the same exact position as the rest and that is the position of lacking conclusive evidence. Your argument was already flawed as soon as you said this:
Originally posted by Condemned0625
These assertions are not proof.
Originally posted by Condemned0625
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is omnipresent, The Flying Spaghetti Monster is everywhere.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is omnipotent, The Flying Spaghetti Monster is all knowing and all powerful
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is Omnibenevolent, The Flying Spaghetti Monster is all loving.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
All these things you may deny. If you do you have only deceived yourself. I am willing to help you get past your deception, but you must want to see.
edit on 4-2-2011 by IAMIAM because: (no reason given)
We are not created in their image, they are created in ours.
Originally posted by Condemned0625
Now you're not making sense at all. More loopholes and deductive reasoning. Nice job. By the way, I'm still not your brother and I don't like it when you write "With love" at the end.
Knowledge is more logical than belief. It's also more important.
Originally posted by Condemned0625
reply to post by Noncompatible
We are not created in their image, they are created in ours.
Exactly. I read all of your post, but that last sentence was the most interesting to me. Man created god in his own image.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
No one should have to want to see for the obvious to be obvious. Wanting to see implies there is nothing to actually see you simply convince yourself there should be. This is true denial.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
If there truly was an omnipotent being then it would not require my love or worship. It would simply require me to act in the fashion for which it had created me.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
Yet every deity ever imagined has displayed the worst traits of humanity in equal measure. Which leads me to the conclusion that all deities (that we have/have had/will have) reflect the simple nature of their creators. We are not created in their image, they are created in ours.
Originally posted by bogomil
You have just moved the reference point to another place, which then will need some kind of justification when presented to a critical public. That is if you still want to avoid being called doctrinal/dogmatic.
Originally posted by bogomil
A universe existing by and through polarized elements relating to each other, and thus forming visible existence is a reasonable idea.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
Not if used as an argument for any theistic theory.
Originally posted by bogomil
You are a really nice guy, and I like you...more when you're not preaching.