It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Robert Grenier - writes today:
Events in the Middle East have slipped away from us. Having long since opted in favour of political stability over the risks and uncertainties of democracy, having told ourselves that the people of the region are not ready to shoulder the burdens of freedom, having stressed that the necessary underpinnings of self-government go well beyon
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
This would have been a good post, however, when an OP uses a source from Michael Moore as part of their basis of argument, you lose all credibility.
Sorry, but a waste of thread space~
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by purplemer
I don't deny that the US shouldn't be in the middle east to promote their own financial gain. But allow me to clarify, most people dont take any thread seriously, if it is referenced to FOX, Michael Moore, or any of the like. Now debating on whether or not these sources are credible is another thread topic.
Just sayin is all...and most people would agree, take note on how very few people have visited this thread. So I rest my case.
Originally posted by Vikus
Actually there was one big politician who did believe in democracy and because of his decisions, the middle east is now on the verge of revolution.
Blame George W. Bush for all the riots. Blame Bush for disrupting the normal American middle east policy of propping up dictators.
Bush wanted democracy in Iraq and Afghanistan, it isn't a stretch that people in other countries don't want to be left behind. Bush went against (well not really) the usual American policy of backing dictators because he needed an excuse to cover the the failure to find WMD's in Iraq.
The entire justification for the Iraq war (post WMD excuse) was to bring democracy to the region. Well now it is being brought only Bush didn't realize it will affect America's dictator friends also.
Whether or not Bush's intentions were noble, it is all his fault, he started the hunger for freedom and started the revolution away from hard core dictators. Whether or not that freedom is actually a good thing for American policy is another thing especially knowing how hypocritical the American government can be.