MRS.. George Soros ???? - 25 yr old

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
So, you've got Soros guilty of beastiality now because of the age difference between him and his wife? That is totally whacked! That's about all I can say about it.

lol
gosh I just love how u twist my words
for your agenda.

I never accused Soros of beastiality.

I used the beastiality article as a
comparison tool to maybe show
a connection between who/what
a person marries and their sexual
preferences.

And according to the info I posted,
it clearly states Soros has a thing for
young women.

Originally posted by boondock-saint
gosh I just love how u twist my words for your agenda.

What agenda? The freedom agenda? The freedom for an adult to marry an adult of their choosing? Guilty as charged!

I actually didn't understand what you were getting at. I wasn't trying to twist your words, I thought you were saying there is a danger that Soros fit the profile of a person who has sex with animals. Sorry if I misunderstood, but that's what I got from your post. I apparently misunderstood.

I used the beastiality article as a comparison tool to maybe show a connection between who/what a person marries and their sexual preferences.

So, you're accusing the guy who 'married' his dog of beastiality?

Soros has a preference for young, beautiful ADULT women? Call the freaking authorities! That's the first time I've heard of such a thing!

And according to the info I posted, it clearly states Soros has a thing for young women.

And? Now you're intimating that he might be a pedophile? Or have I misunderstood again?

.

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic

lol

nice try but I won't be baited

best wishes

Personally you all should mind your own business regarding his personal affairs. Being married to someone over the age of 18 last I checked was legal.

Originally posted by libertytoall
Being married to someone over the age of 18 last I checked was legal.

yes it is ..... ur right
how stupid of me

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
They are both of age and and are free to pursue their happiness in whatever why they see fit. They're not hurting other people with their relationship.

I'm not sure why people have to be so judgmental about what others do in their personal lives...

I haven't seen one post so far that suggests that this relationship should be prohibited in any way.

They have the freedom to form this relationship which each other if they want to, just as everybody else has the freedom to comment, criticise and condemn this relationship if they want.

As long as both parties are happy with this arrangement, then so be it. Personally speaking, I think both Soros and his wife lack any kind of self-respect, and I'm not going to apologise for finding their personal lives to be more than a little bit disgusting.


On the off-chance that she has a thing for octogenarians and would have married him if he had been living on the streets, and that he fell head over heels in love with her because of her personality, charm and wit, then I would be the first to apologise for any judgemental comments that I have made.

However, I think it's much more likely that Soros is a dirty old man who is suffering a mid-life crisis 40 years too late, and that she is a dirty money-grubbing slapper who has compromised her dignity and self-respect in the greedy pursuit of $$$.


I'm not sure why people have to be so bothered about others expressing their personal opinions...

Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
I haven't seen one post so far that suggests that this relationship should be prohibited in any way.

I haven't either. And not one of my posts has suggested that this critique should be prohibited in any way.

The OP talked about the illegality of beastiality and one poster called her a hooker. Those are both illegal. I never could get out of the OP WHY he brought up beastiality, because he apparently thinks I'm "baiting" him instead of looking for an answer in my confusion.

I think both Soros and his wife lack any kind of self-respect, and I'm not going to apologise for finding their personal lives to be more than a little bit disgusting.

This information isn't even current. He's been through several girlfriends since then.

However, I think it's much more likely that Soros is a dirty old man who is suffering a mid-life crisis 40 years too late, and that she is a dirty money-grubbing slapper who has compromised her dignity and self-respect in the greedy pursuit of $$$.

Way to jump to conclusions! That's what we need in this divided nation! More jumping to negative conclusions about each other. /sarcasm

I'm not sure why people have to be so bothered about others expressing their personal opinions...

Who said I'm "bothered"? I just said I don't understand it.

But people applying THEIR standards of love and marriage on other people is why gay people can't marry in this country today and THAT'S why I wonder about how judgmental people are. I get to say what my marriage is about. No one else. I think sticking our nose into other people's personal relationships is weird and "eeeww".

reply to post by boondock-saint




Why is this on ATS instead of BTS under "celeb gossip"?

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by VictorVonDoom
Now if you all will excuse me, I need to do some sit-ups before I go out and buy some Grecian Formula and Viagra.

ummm
don't forget to stop off at the bank
on the way home and pick up
$10M.

10 mil!?! I don't have that kind of cash! I guess I just did 2-1/2 sit-ups for nothing. There's 3 hrs. of my life I'll never get back

Way too over priced, and a bit on the flabby side to be considered high class call girls.
Even Anna Nicole, with all the extra pounds, could show these chicks a thing or two.

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
The OP talked about the illegality of beastiality and one poster called her a hooker. Those are both illegal. I never could get out of the OP WHY he brought up beastiality, because he apparently thinks I'm "baiting" him instead of looking for an answer in my confusion.

The comment of yours that I was replying to preceded the OP's post that had a link concerning bestiality ( and which I hadn't seen at the time when I replied to you ).

This woman is a prostitute, though. She is performing sexual favours/providing company to a man in exchange for some kind of payment, not just $$$, but perhaps a certain degree of safety and security that a man of his power and influence can provide.

It doesn't matter whether prostitution is illegal in some circumstances, what this woman has done is to sell her body for cash; so, she has quite rightly been branded a ''hooker'' by some people.

If someone finds a loophole to legally steal money that isn't theirs, then that doesn't mean that they aren't a thief.


I took the intention of the OP's thread to be an insight into the psyche of someone like George Soros.

Here you have someone who is undeniably rich, powerful and influential, yet he still lusts after young women, despite being old enough to be their grandfather.

When you see people in the upper echelons of the corporate hierarchy having a pathological and addictive lust for power, wealth and influence, then it is worth looking at a lot of the psychological reasons as to why these people may turn out this way, and why their actions are immoral, psychopathic, and at times, apparently, delusional.

Old Georgie appears to have a fondness for young women, so this could explain one reason for men such as him to carry on in a completely unethical and megalomaniacal way; a bitterness that stems from a lack of youth and virility, and the inescapable realisation of their own mortality.

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This information isn't even current. He's been through several girlfriends since then.

My mistake.
I'm not going to bother with an excuse , as some days I'm just ''not at the races'', and my reading and comprehension skills are slightly awry.

I misinterpreted it that this Marina ''lady'' was actually his wife, rather than just a highly-paid girlfriend.

I think that this fact actually adds support to the notion that Soros has got a penchant for young women, despite being intelligent enough to know that they are only interested in him for his $$$, thus making these liaisons ultimately unfulfilling for him, other than on a physical level ( and at his age, you wonder just how physically fulfilling these relationships actually are ).

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Way to jump to conclusions!

That's what we need in this divided nation! More jumping to negative conclusions about each other. /sarcasm

Firstly, I'm not from your nation ( thankfully ).

Secondly, you know deep down that my appraisal of their relationship has got a 99% chance of being true.

It's one thing to criticise negativity and cynicism when people are adopting those stances as a default position.

It's quite another thing to criticise somebody for forming a logical conclusion on a set of facts that happens to be negative and cynical.

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Who said I'm "bothered"? I just said I don't understand it.

You were bothered enough to post your thoughts on the matter., which were apparently tinged with a mild displeasure at people who were judgemental towards others.

Besides, the '''' at the end of my post should be enough to indicate that I was turning your words back on to you in a light-hearted vein.

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
But people applying THEIR standards of love and marriage on other people is why gay people can't marry in this country today and THAT'S why I wonder about how judgmental people are.

This is not a valid comparison.

As we've already agreed upon, nobody is disputing the right of an old man to have a relationship with a young woman, if both parties are consenting.

We're just passing our personal opinions on it.

Comparing that to legal discrimination against gay people is both unfair and erroneous.

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I get to say what my marriage is about. No one else.

What, your husband doesn't have a say... ?

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I think sticking our nose into other people's personal relationships is weird and "eeeww".

Which is an opinion that you're perfectly entitled to, however illogical and contradictory it may be.

I personally find your ''PC'' view that quells personal creativity, independence and expression to be a little bit ''eeeww''...

Originally posted by blupblup
Why is this on ATS instead of BTS under "celeb gossip"?

Why didn't you make this suggestion to an ATS staff member, via pm, rather than using this thread to make - what can only be interpreted as - an attention seeking comment.

it's all about money

Oops. Single post. Sorry.

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
They are both of age and and are free to pursue their happiness in whatever why they see fit. They're not hurting other people with their relationship.

I'm not sure why people have to be so judgmental about what others do in their personal lives...

Yeah, I'm sure the x wife wasn't hurt at all.

ah, so old men like young women and young women like money?
its true, you really do learn something new each day.

She works hard for the money
So hard for it, honey....

Looking at both their pictures I just can't help but laugh my bal** off. They are obiously both despicable human beings (don't give me that "How can you judge them?" BS), but you can't say she doesn't earn all that dough. I mean, the things she has to do are truly unspeakable.

Its something that goes on all the time.

Human nature maybe?? What is it being filthy rich that makes an older guy think a young babe loves him for "him" and not his money?? What is it about filthy rich older guys that attracts beautiful young babes??

I mean - for every filthy rich older guy there are millions of middle income or poor older guys a beautiful young lady could choose from.

Anyway - he (and she) are far from alone in this.

A Guide to Old Men and Their Much Younger Wives

Those are just a few of the more rich and famous ones around NY. Image if that list was scaled up to include the rest of US or world.

reply to post by Night Star


So, THAT'S why everyone is upset? Interesting that no one mentioned a word about his ex in all these posts... Not a word about the story or how she is suffering because of it all. Hmmm. I would have thought if that were the reason, SOMEONE would have mentioned it, but nope. Not a word...

He divorced his wife in 2004 and this woman was his girlfriend 3 years later, but I guess we can blame her.

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic


Oooops. My bad! Sorry about that. carry on.