It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


A totally new version of the Jerusalem UFO!

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Jan, 31 2011 @ 07:46 PM
reply to post by SchoolProject

I think I and others, have the right to shout HOAX on this as much as anyone has the right to say this is proof of ET.
I have a challenge for you...count up how many times people have screamed "hoax" so far, and then count up how many have screamed "this is proof of aliens"...

Also, not a SINGLE person has mentioned the lack of the flash???
Uhh, it's been mentioned several times, I even offered an explanation as for why it wasn't seen.

edit on 31-1-2011 by WhizPhiz because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 31 2011 @ 07:47 PM
reply to post by redoubt

Maybe this is the motive behind this obvious fake!
Just to discredit the 1st and original vid.....This would makes sense in a way I suppose but who would want to discredit a ufo sighting??

posted on Jan, 31 2011 @ 07:48 PM
this video has already been included in the massive J thread.
It's the worst of the bunch!
totally retarded

posted on Jan, 31 2011 @ 07:49 PM
reply to post by Analyzing

Interesting, I noticed however the "flash" was missing in this video that was obvious in the previous videos.

In both videos the timing from "landing" to take off is consistent at around 23/24 seconds after its stopped descending to its take off.

Very interesting...

edit: the reactions again seem silly...."is that a UFO...amazing"...just like oh ya cool?? not near enough excitement in my opinion.
edit on 31-1-2011 by Sly1one because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 31 2011 @ 07:51 PM

Originally posted by SchoolProject
reply to post by Analyzing

Already posted and debunked to death:
Looks like a still image (especially when it's zoomed in). No flash like the original 2...

Topic will probably be closed.

Please contribute to the original thread on this topic.
edit on January 31st 2011 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics
<< 1   >>

log in