It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
You want change. I want change. Everyone wants change.
When a group(s) violently overthrow a government, doesn't that just leave a violent government in charge? What peace does this new government bring, after dripping blood from it's own sword of "peace"?
I'm looking at many facets, many countries, many protests. I'm also trying to see past the "glorious revolution" and trying to look at the new country(s) that may emerge.
This is not a prophetic thread about Egypt, not a veiled one at America. But a general warning, a caution. To what may be coming. What might be expected.
Personally, I think the title says it all, but if you have any thoughts on the issue, would like to hear them.
Originally posted by Quasar_La-Zar
Government = Corrupt leaders
So how in the world could you "elect" [which is a total lie] a leader to run your country,
but on the path to becoming a leader, you get power and money which = corruption
The only true government I can see that would work is based off a resource based economy, but only if the rest of the world would agree to throw away THE MONEY THAT CAUSES CORRUPTION !!!
In a world without money, we would not be so wasteful like we are now, the only reason we are wasteful is because of money,
for how can you make money if your product lasts forever, called Planned Obsolescence.
Just look at our landfills for 5 minutes and this rings very very true.
Also this whole egypt thing is interesting and all, but 18,000 PEOPLE S T A R V I N G every single day from lack of money is more important to me.
Originally posted by unityemissions
You can overthrow a tyrannical government without becoming a tyrant yourself.
How is it that people can honestly not see this being done?
Doesn't history show otherwise?!
The common man, overthrowing oppressive governments, and installing a more sane government?!
How the hell was the United States even formed?!
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
Thank you for your input. But communism non-violent?
I'm confused.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by TedHodgson
reply to post by beezzer
I Understand your saying, A Government Born in the Heat Of Battle Has Blood on its hands
I suppose thats right But i Very much doubt they'd be any-worse than the Government they Over-run.
It has to come down to motive. What was the previous government's motive? What is the NEW government's motive?
Ultimately, what do they want?
All governments will acquiesce to the influence of money, if the players remain, the game will never change IMO.
Even under the guise of revolution, influence will always find its way back
Originally posted by John_Rodger_Cornman
Ban all private ownership of infrastructures.The public owns it. Waterworks,Power,roads,railroads,harbors,land(no property tax).
Ban all private ownership of business entities.The public owns it(1% per local resident no more).
Back money up with raw resources like nickel,copper,platinum,silver,gold,fresh water,non-GMO crops etc.
No central banks.No FIAT currency. PERIOD.
Pay is determined by how much you contribute to the community in paid volunteership hours.Sit on your ass you get barely enough to pay the bills and some cheap subsidized food. Contribute and you can get a condo and eat at a nice restraint and order a pizza.
Giving money to another person is impossible AND illegal(secured debit).
Originally posted by DogsDogsDogs
reply to post by unityemissions
I don't disagree with you in substance, but 2008 did change one thing (though I'm not sure how many people got the message instead of focusing on the object of that message- Obama). It clearly illustrated what our potential is; what we CAN do if we ACT: by showing up to indicate our direction and by voting. It repeated itself in the Nov 2 elections. Even though on a much reduced scale, with not a little cynicism and disappointment in play, we created a second statistically historic change. We CAN. The question is WILL we.
It doesn't take violence. It only (HA. "only") requires awareness, commitment, and follow through. Now if our officials should choose to ignore our dictates, we'd need a Plan B. Imo, that still wouldn't require violence on our part because we have a military and law enforcement who are sworn (and I believe they will, based on my firsthand knowledge) to uphold the Constitution and protect the US- to act on our behalf. Given the nature of those two bodies, our civilian government would have no choice unless they tried to amass martial support of their own. A "military coup" would then be theirs, not ours.
GREAT thread, Beezzer!!edit on 31-1-2011 by DogsDogsDogs because: do I HAVE to?