It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
reply to post by unityemissions
"I ask you again, how in the hell are you going to get these people to make a dent of difference to a tyrannical government which will use force, and has at least 70% totally brainwashed, without willing to use force ourselves??"
Those names mentioned previously (who you may actually enjoy reading about) all faced propaganda, bullets and force. People died, people suffered, people sacrificed... this was/is the unescapable reality... but in the end... the people won. They kept their dignity and self-worth... They remained true to themselves and the path of unity/peace/wisdom... and History has, and will continue to, show them as an example for how we are to create a better world.
Q: Which is more likely to succeed right now in America, a non-violent or violent revolution?
A: What is your definition of success? The overthrow of this current government, or the accomplishment of changing what you want changed?
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
reply to post by unityemissions
Study your signature, live by it, be it... then you will understand.
"A mind that has any form of fear cannot obviously have the quality of love, sympathy, tenderness. Fear is the destructive energy in man. It withers the mind, it distorts thought, it leads to all kinds of extraordinarily clever and subtle theories, absurd superstitions, dogmas, and beliefs." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
Originally posted by 547000
I plainly disagree. When the government knows the people have no qualms with violent revolution, then they're not tyrannical.
Originally posted by 547000
I plainly disagree. When the government knows the people have no qualms with violent revolution, then they're not tyrannical.
Originally posted by unityemissions
Why has this idea become so ingrained in the CT community?!
I know there's a lot of "feelers" here on this site, but this is just nonsense!
You can overthrow a tyrannical government without becoming a tyrant yourself.
How is it that people can honestly not see this being done?
Doesn't history show otherwise?!
Originally posted by unityemissions
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by autowrench
I had tried to make this a general debate, but on a personal level I must agree with you on the issues that plague America. The elections in 2008 illustrated that "change" can come from peaceful elections. I just hope that further "change" can also come from the same election process in 2012.
Wait a tic, you think the 2008 election process brought about "change?! Are you a racist?! lol. j/k.
The only change we got was a half dollar magically transformed into a few copper pennies. Yes, the copper may be useful in some things, but overall we got scammed.
We know the elections are a con. If you can't see that, you're a little behind in the CT world. Sorry bud, but that's just another "reality show" for the lemmings.edit on 31-1-2011 by unityemissions because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by unityemissions
Why has this idea become so ingrained in the CT community?!
I know there's a lot of "feelers" here on this site, but this is just nonsense!
You can overthrow a tyrannical government without becoming a tyrant yourself.
You can -- or might. In reality, there are factors that make it less likely than you would like to think.
Such as, breakdown of mores previously existing in the society, breakdown of allegiance and by
definition, the presence of highly capable and ruthless wing in perpetrators of the new order.
How is it that people can honestly not see this being done?
Doesn't history show otherwise?!
It totally does not.French revolution and Russian revolution are two glaring examples.