It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
With the state of technology in video conferencing available to these folks, there appears no compelling reason for face-to-face contact.
Originally posted by pirhanna
reply to post by hp1229
People also blink because their eyes are dry or irritated or they haven't had enough sleep, or have had eye surgeries, or their allergies are bad.
To suggest that blinking is a sure indicator of lying is just ignorant.edit on 31-1-2011 by pirhanna because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by apodictic
reply to post by pirhanna
Try looking at her facial movement. It's ignorant to suggest that's ignorant if you've never taken a basic psychology course. If you have, you can surely see the signsedit on 31-1-2011 by apodictic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sliceNodice
What is the crap about Hillary lying?
Don't you all know, she is always lying. She is a politician you know (and a high up American one at that).
I feel like you people are telling me the grass is green.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
I have no idea how this thread turned into
a physical assessment of Hilary's body
language but if you folks want to go
that route I guess that's up to the folks
who want to pursue it.
However, I just had another thought
which has not been mentioned yet
and wanted to add to my previous
theories from page 2.
This may have some connection to
the recent lockdown of several chemical
testing bases in the US.
If there has been chemical agents stolen
from the US Army as has been leaked,
then there may exist an international
threat of their implementation world wide.
Maybe Hilary is alerting ALL Embassies
to be on the lookout for a possible attack
since it was also leaked that the people who
stole these chemicals had anti-US Government
Hilary cannot use SIPRNET to relay this
info on the chems as SIPRNET has been
compromised as far as being a secure
That would be worth the dollars spent on
getting them all together under one roof.
just a thought
edit on 1/31/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by avatar22
Here are my thoughts on this...
the answer is z: all of the above
World powers are tumbling
Global economics are crumbling
UFO's are being seen everywhere
US citizens are becoming more and more restless
Weather patters are CRAZY
Yellowstone is awakening
Officials being "murdered"
Chem testing facilities on lock down
Wouldn't this be the perfect time to decide the game plan?
Where to go...
Who to talk to/who to fight...
Who's in charge...
Doesn't really matter if there's a main reason in my book... it's ALL urgent!!
Originally posted by BLV12
reply to post by 00nunya00
I think that's a bit extreme.
There's nothing really to suggest sh** will hit the fan in Australia, Germany etc. So why bring those ambassadors home?
Originally posted by Skerrako
Well one of the U.S.'s top Ambassador just resigned:
Probably not related but newsworthy none-the-less