Are UFOs just Alternative Aviation Technology (AAT) ?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 30-1-2011 @ 10:30 AM by IAMTAT
reply to post by r00t999


Regarding NI-11; is it possible that the 'NI' designation may also stand for 'Naval Intelligence'...a U.S. Dept. of Defense agency long known to be a cover for alternate aerospace technology development?



reply posted on 30-1-2011 @ 10:30 AM by IAMTAT
reply to post by r00t999


Regarding NI-11; is it possible that the 'NI' designation may also stand for 'Naval Intelligence'...a U.S. Dept. of Defense agency long known to be a cover for alternate aerospace technology development?


reply posted on 30-1-2011 @ 10:54 AM by r00t999
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to
post by r00t999


Regarding NI-11; is it possible that the 'NI' designation may also stand for 'Naval Intelligence'...a U.S. Dept. of Defense agency long known to be a cover for alternate aerospace technology development?



Thanks for your reply. BTW, forgot to mention, thanks for your flag as well

Regarding Naval Intelligence: do you have a source to share with us ?


reply posted on 30-1-2011 @ 12:28 PM by hybridkate
reply to post by r00t999



The FIRST problem with your theory is it doenst provide an answer as to who or what is abducting people and putting impalnts in them????? Second, after seeing FEMA in action with Katrina, I doubt very highly our government could pull off what you are inferring



reply posted on 30-1-2011 @ 01:52 PM by IAMTAT

Regarding Naval Intelligence: do you have a source to share with us ?
reply to
post by r00t999


Alas, no....I rely only on the long-held understanding that the US Navy has harbored many black op military programs.
Please elaborate more on NI-11, if you are able. I may be wrong, but you write with a certitude which leads me to believe you may actually possess evidence which backs up your interesting assertions. Theory is fine for a short and fun post and nominal discussion, but please post anything of a solid evidentiary nature you may have, as it will go a great distance towards bringing forward more interest, longevity and attention to your post.


reply posted on 30-1-2011 @ 08:11 PM by IAMTAT
reply to post by r00t999



Lets add one more wrinkle to your NI-11 AAT theory. Assuming that this secret entity in fact does exist and that it works with/within the US government on developing alternative aeronautical technology...and that this technology most probably involves anti-gravitational field technology...then lets take your theory full-circle.

Time travel has also been predicted as an element involved in this type of technology. Assume for a minute that your NI-11 group is actually a traditional and functioning US DOD organization, but one set up in a unique way; a way which directly involves both the time and space travel benefits associated with anti-gravitational technology.

Assume for a moment that it utilizes a multi-temporal technology development relay, whereby technology from our future is physically transported via this advanced craft back into our present or even recent past, to be retro-engineered by technology teams in our present standing by to receive this future technology, all the while working in tandem with their future counterparts.

Imagine a time-technology relay system constantly sending back and upgrading new technologies over 10, 20,50, or even 100 year circuits with an ongoing end result of EXPONENTIALLY advancing technological systems while continuously keeping this development internalized within a top secret organization which distributesover and functions simultaneously within a technological-development network spanning a multitude of points in time.

In short, NI-11 (future) sends advanced technology to its NI-11 (present) counterpart for retro-engineering and development, thus simultaneously moving both NI-11 (future) AND NI-11 (present) technologically forward beyond where they initially began. In this way, a temporally-based NI-11 network is able to manufacture technological quantum leaps in an ongoing manner within their own closed system.

Thoughts ASTers?


reply posted on 31-1-2011 @ 01:32 PM by r00t999
Originally posted by hybridkate
reply to
post by r00t999



The FIRST problem with your theory is it doenst provide an answer as to who or what is abducting people and putting impalnts in them????? Second, after seeing FEMA in action with Katrina, I doubt very highly our government could pull off what you are inferring


Thanks.

For abduction cases:

Needless to say, there are hallucinations, mass hysteria,...

For the more reliable/undisputable cases:

NI-11 provide the AAT craft.
NI-11 provide the actors masquerading as ETs.

In short:
Witness(es) is/are a member(s) of an audience/victim(s) to a show

Purpose of the show: Just like Inception: Incept the idea of ETs to divert public attention while other secret missions going on...again divert public's attention.

Secret missions may or may not be related to US government.
Timing/Venue/Victim of these shows are chosen by NI-11.

Needless to say, Location of abduction can be abroad.

Whenever there is a need for a show, NI-11 will perform one.
edit on 31-1-2011 by r00t999 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 31-1-2011 @ 01:38 PM by r00t999
Originally posted by IAMTAT


Regarding Naval Intelligence: do you have a source to share with us ?
reply to
post by r00t999


Alas, no....I rely only on the long-held understanding that the US Navy has harbored many black op military programs.
Please elaborate more on NI-11, if you are able. I may be wrong, but you write with a certitude which leads me to believe you may actually possess evidence which backs up your interesting assertions. Theory is fine for a short and fun post and nominal discussion, but please post anything of a solid evidentiary nature you may have, as it will go a great distance towards bringing forward more interest, longevity and attention to your post.



Thanks for your support.

Evidence: Fellow ATSers, perhaps we can go back to the cases that we think are most trustworthy and see if this theory can be applied.

I don't have evidence to show for the time being.


reply posted on 31-1-2011 @ 01:43 PM by r00t999
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to
post by r00t999



Lets add one more wrinkle to your NI-11 AAT theory. Assuming that this secret entity in fact does exist and that it works with/within the US government on developing alternative aeronautical technology...and that this technology most probably involves anti-gravitational field technology...then lets take your theory full-circle.

Time travel has also been predicted as an element involved in this type of technology. Assume for a minute that your NI-11 group is actually a traditional and functioning US DOD organization, but one set up in a unique way; a way which directly involves both the time and space travel benefits associated with anti-gravitational technology.

Assume for a moment that it utilizes a multi-temporal technology development relay, whereby technology from our future is physically transported via this advanced craft back into our present or even recent past, to be retro-engineered by technology teams in our present standing by to receive this future technology, all the while working in tandem with their future counterparts.

Imagine a time-technology relay system constantly sending back and upgrading new technologies over 10, 20,50, or even 100 year circuits with an ongoing end result of EXPONENTIALLY advancing technological systems while continuously keeping this development internalized within a top secret organization which distributesover and functions simultaneously within a technological-development network spanning a multitude of points in time.

In short, NI-11 (future) sends advanced technology to its NI-11 (present) counterpart for retro-engineering and development, thus simultaneously moving both NI-11 (future) AND NI-11 (present) technologically forward beyond where they initially began. In this way, a temporally-based NI-11 network is able to manufacture technological quantum leaps in an ongoing manner within their own closed system.

Thoughts ASTers?


Thanks for your contribution to the theory.

However, I think the concept of having time-travel is a bit far-fetched. It is quite entertaining, however.


reply posted on 31-1-2011 @ 01:47 PM by r00t999
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to
post by r00t999


Regarding NI-11; is it possible that the 'NI' designation may also stand for 'Naval Intelligence'...a U.S. Dept. of Defense agency long known to be a cover for alternate aerospace technology development?



Sorry, I could have got back a bit earlier on this one.

I don't think NI means Naval Intelligence, as I have mentioned earlier they work outside the mainstream military organization. However, having said that, it is very possible that NI-11 has been acting as outside consultants for DoD.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Greetings from a near-death experiencer.
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
Finally signed up :-)
  Posted 6 days ago with 10 member flags
New To ATS...Just Learning (Help!) Love This Site!
  Posted 11 days ago with 8 member flags
New Account/Old Member
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags
What I hate the most..
  Posted 18 days ago with 6 member flags
Yes Im new
  Posted 17 days ago with 6 member flags
Hey!
  Posted 17 days ago with 6 member flags