It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by r00t999
Originally posted by kimsie
One does not need Faith to see tangible historical records carved in stone.
Thanks for your reply.
"A" may see an UFO on these records, "B" may see something else.
IMHO, these are not real evidences. Do you have a most tangible historical record to show us ?
Originally posted by kimsie
You are making your ignorance very obvious.
How ?
You are definitive proof that most humans are not ready for "full disclosure".
Originally posted by Deebo
If these craft are ours, why are we sending jets in the sky, to chase our own stuff?
Deebo
Why have ancient civilizations depicted ufo's, way before the black powder musket was invented?
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to post by r00t999
Regarding NI-11; is it possible that the 'NI' designation may also stand for 'Naval Intelligence'...a U.S. Dept. of Defense agency long known to be a cover for alternate aerospace technology development?
Originally posted by boondock-saint
now a question:
If UFO's are really AAT's
then why has no pilots EVER
came forth and disclosed such
even on their deathbeds ???
Originally posted by badw0lf
Hmm, I've yet to see a UFO.
Originally posted by Deebo
Why have ancient civilizations depicted ufo's...
Originally posted by Deebo
If these craft are ours, why are we sending jets in the sky, to chase our own stuff?
reply to post by r00t999
Regarding Naval Intelligence: do you have a source to share with us ?
Originally posted by hybridkate
reply to post by r00t999
The FIRST problem with your theory is it doenst provide an answer as to who or what is abducting people and putting impalnts in them????? Second, after seeing FEMA in action with Katrina, I doubt very highly our government could pull off what you are inferring
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to post by r00t999
Regarding Naval Intelligence: do you have a source to share with us ?
Alas, no....I rely only on the long-held understanding that the US Navy has harbored many black op military programs.
Please elaborate more on NI-11, if you are able. I may be wrong, but you write with a certitude which leads me to believe you may actually possess evidence which backs up your interesting assertions. Theory is fine for a short and fun post and nominal discussion, but please post anything of a solid evidentiary nature you may have, as it will go a great distance towards bringing forward more interest, longevity and attention to your post.
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to post by r00t999
Lets add one more wrinkle to your NI-11 AAT theory. Assuming that this secret entity in fact does exist and that it works with/within the US government on developing alternative aeronautical technology...and that this technology most probably involves anti-gravitational field technology...then lets take your theory full-circle.
Time travel has also been predicted as an element involved in this type of technology. Assume for a minute that your NI-11 group is actually a traditional and functioning US DOD organization, but one set up in a unique way; a way which directly involves both the time and space travel benefits associated with anti-gravitational technology.
Assume for a moment that it utilizes a multi-temporal technology development relay, whereby technology from our future is physically transported via this advanced craft back into our present or even recent past, to be retro-engineered by technology teams in our present standing by to receive this future technology, all the while working in tandem with their future counterparts.
Imagine a time-technology relay system constantly sending back and upgrading new technologies over 10, 20,50, or even 100 year circuits with an ongoing end result of EXPONENTIALLY advancing technological systems while continuously keeping this development internalized within a top secret organization which distributesover and functions simultaneously within a technological-development network spanning a multitude of points in time.
In short, NI-11 (future) sends advanced technology to its NI-11 (present) counterpart for retro-engineering and development, thus simultaneously moving both NI-11 (future) AND NI-11 (present) technologically forward beyond where they initially began. In this way, a temporally-based NI-11 network is able to manufacture technological quantum leaps in an ongoing manner within their own closed system.
Thoughts ASTers?
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to post by r00t999
Regarding NI-11; is it possible that the 'NI' designation may also stand for 'Naval Intelligence'...a U.S. Dept. of Defense agency long known to be a cover for alternate aerospace technology development?