It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

And the award for best conclusive evidence of aliens goes out to.....?

page: 1
2
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 09:24 PM
link   
As the world knows by now, I have never and will never believe in flying saucers, why?
because i saw a triangle alien spaceship up close amongst other things, but forget me who cares !
i would like to present my award winner, the Zhejiang' airport incident ,i have always explained to you all that the ‘saucers sightings’ are just the underneath of a triangle space ship ,in the ‘form’ of if the engines are on, 1 engine turned on is 80% of all sightings that have ever been documented in the history of earth it self, 2 engines turned on is 96% of all UFO documented history on earth, and of course, three engines turned is the triangle.

The triangle from a distance from ground level is your classic tube shape sighting ,but it gets a little tricky because orbs are evolved in the whole’ count aspect, and then that’s when you have your classic, ‘MULTIPLE SIGHTINGS’, those are a combination of probes and 1 triangle or 2 .

Kenneth Arnold I believe was maybe the first human to report seeing them from the top, I say first because he was flying and 99.4% of sightings are viewed from the bottom.

Have you noticed that abduction stories have gone down and less reports of flying saucers as of lately, wont say anything about that ,it seems entire threads disappear when you say that word ,so I wont say that the government within the last 20 plus years have been putting chemicals in the air so that they wont abduct you, and I wont say that there last know base where they did there experiments on humans was at a place called Duice, I’m not going to go there !

This video here is a classic example of what a triangle looks like from the side, Kenneth saw it from top, we all have seen it from the bottom, now we can look at it from the side.
It wasn’t beaming light , it was gathering energy ,what ever the hell that is in the clouds, they definitely prosper from it.

I will go off topic just to say this and this only, I don’t need replies for this because it’s the first time I have ever said this ,But when I saw the triangle space ship I saw , swear to the mother of all life ,it seems that they have a device that enables them to ‘EITHER‘ create clouds, or a cloud effect in front or around them. Just saying !

But just to be frank, I think there protocol on a 89% level of truthfulness, I think there protocol is to go from cloud to cloud ,if its any time to catch a ufo, it might be when the clouds are heavy.
I only say this because thinking back ,the clouds was just way to low, but any way, here is my award winning best case for and ET vehicle, a UFO…..BETTER YET, here is a CLASSIC Triangle space ship, piloted by aliens over china some where.

Ps. They are not ufos in the 2011 any more, they are not lights they are engines, the probes have engines ,they are not lights, the triangle has 3 engines, they are not lights, and if you believe in the saucer or any other thing you believe in ,they are not lights, they are engines, and those that drive those spaceships ,with there engines are now identified.
Lets not only deny ignorance lets stop using lights and terms of language that tricks the brain from the truth, so next time you describe a sighting, lets do it this way.

i will tell you what you need to know,tell me what happened

well,i was listing to a song called'i wear my sunglasses at night and all of the sudden i saw these strange lights in the sky,flying very weired,i think it was a ufo.

i think it was a ufo to..NEXT !

I saw a triangle space shipbeing piloted by aliens flying very weird in the sky, it was silent and very big, you should of seen how big those 3 engines are that it takes to lift that ship in the air, I thank you should try to start building your engines from the bottom, I think that’s a start to evolving to the new wave of aerodynamics, just a thought NASA.

?

Just a thought .




What are your award winners,and can you explain why it is.




posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 09:32 PM
link   
Well I think that you are going out on a deep end with you're idea of chemicals in the sky and alien abductions theory. Also the statistics you are saying don't make much sense. TBH I don't think you make a lot of sense at all. But those are two good videos that I've never seen and I don't know if they are real or not. They could be tests of the new stealth fighter.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 09:44 PM
link   
reply to post by LinkInc
 


What about his cloud idea? I know that celebrities use smoke machines in Hollywood to disguise their presence in streets and shops. Maybe that's why every 'credible' UFO photo shows UFOs in a clear sky?

Anyway jokes aside, i see what OP is trying to say. I don't think there have been any other 'conclusive evidence' of UFOs last year, most videos from users that i've seen from here have been debunked as being birds.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 09:57 PM
link   
i think the best evidence for aliens and ufo can be found in ancient texts....they connot be confused with planes, satellites, ballons, flares etc.... there is a massive amounts of archeologicals evidence..its overwhelming



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 10:00 PM
link   
Just curious. On 3 or 4 occasions you through out some percentages in your OP. Could you tell me where you got those from?
Thanks.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 10:13 PM
link   
The last video is a police helicopter shot with a long exposure - there is an ATS thread somewhere.

Ouch - damn my lips bleeding.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 10:16 PM
link   
Maybe it's me, but I have no idea what you're talking about. Something about triangles and UFO engines or something? Is there any way you could write out the post for people who don't know anything about you or your theories? Can you assume the reader is coming to your post fresh, and explain what you're talking about? It just doesn't seem to make any sense whatsoever.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 11:12 PM
link   
op,
I saw a B2 bomber near Eglin Air Force Base, flying in low gloomy fog clouds, it came out then made a hard right bank and went right back in the clouds.
So maybe the stealth pilots used reverse technoligy flying techniques when they fly?

oh and get this it made no sound!! hmm, because I've seen other B2 fly over since then and they created sound as they flew over!!


Best case is by far the Belgium wave.
It's documented multiple times, multiple eye witnesses, radar, Belgium military, photo, and possible video
That is the case to hammer home. It is supported by the country's government and military. Plus it seems to fit your obsession on the triangle.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 01:05 AM
link   
Op's post-"As the world knows by now, I have never and will never believe in flying saucers, why?
because i saw a triangle alien spaceship up close amongst other things,"


I believe that there are credible reports of advanced government aircraft. One thing I do not believe is that they are alien. If the pics and video you posted are real then they look terestrial in origin to me. If I could ask you(I am not being sarcastic), what brought you to the conclusion that they are alien? I am curious because I am still looking for the alien smoking gun and I cannot seem to find it.
edit on 29-1-2011 by liejunkie01 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 01:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by mysteryskeptic
op,
I saw a B2 bomber near Eglin Air Force Base, flying in low gloomy fog clouds, it came out then made a hard right bank and went right back in the clouds.
So maybe the stealth pilots used reverse technoligy flying techniques when they fly?

oh and get this it made no sound!! hmm, because I've seen other B2 fly over since then and they created sound as they flew over!!


Best case is by far the Belgium wave.
It's documented multiple times, multiple eye witnesses, radar, Belgium military, photo, and possible video
That is the case to hammer home. It is supported by the country's government and military. Plus it seems to fit your obsession on the triangle.




I don't mean to digress, but I've been looking for stupid NASA projects and found this one. www.infoniac.com... I think relates to your post comment in a way, and why I mentioned it here. I've been looking through NASA stupid ideas and projects recently, and I think I have found the dumbest one of all which would be that thing.

Some back ground: GE developed an all electric jet quite a few years ago, and made it feasible later with Li-Ion tech.

To clarify: I am speaking to NASA's ridiculous application more than anything here. It looks like they either copied GE's design or reinvented the wheel so to speak. At any rate GE developed it first with some help from Queen Mary, University of London. I've read a lot on electric jet technology over the years, and trust me these NASA fools are not doing anything new.

So now I'll quietly jet on out of here.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 02:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by FoxBenBen
there is a massive amounts of archeologicals evidence..its overwhelming


overwhelming?

KEWL! Can you post some links please? Thanks



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:00 AM
link   
Removed unnecessary quote

Text engine turned on is 80% of all sightings that have ever been documented in the history of earth it self pertaining to the saucer it self, 2 engines turned on is 96% of all UFO documented history on earth involving multiple saucer sightings,, and of course, three engines turned is the triangle.

sorry.






edit on 29/1/2011 by Sauron because: removed unnecessary quote



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:02 AM
link   





posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:05 AM
link   
reply to post by VeniVidi
 


87.54% of percentages are made up on the spot



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:12 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 








whole picture of one already posted above:








If that's not enough for you go ahead and do a quick Google search of "ancient ufos" lol.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by LinkInc
Well I think that you are going out on a deep end with you're idea of chemicals in the sky and alien abductions theory. Also the statistics you are saying don't make much sense. TBH I don't think you make a lot of sense at all. But those are two good videos that I've never seen and I don't know if they are real or not. They could be tests of the new stealth fighter.

The same chemicals that are killing the bees ,are the same ones they use to keeep the aliens from landing.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by VeniVidi
Just curious. On 3 or 4 occasions you through out some percentages in your OP. Could you tell me where you got those from?
Thanks.

1 engine turned on is 80% of all sightings that have ever been documented in the history of earth it self pertaining to the saucer it self, 2 engines turned on is 96% of all UFO documented history on earth involving multiple saucer sightings,, and of course, three engines turned is the triangle.
sorry,but its true,its 100% true to be exact.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by apodictic
reply to post by VeniVidi
 


87.54% of percentages are made up on the spot


lol,it might even be higher.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:29 AM
link   





posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:31 AM
link   
reply to post by apodictic
 


Great pictures of the underneath part of the triangle,classic engines being seen from a far distance,classic 1 engine turned on effect.
edit on Sat Jan 29 2011 by DontTreadOnMe because: Mod Note: Big Quote – Please Review This Link.



new topics

top topics



 
2
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join