Can science prove this???...., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 12-7-2004 @ 10:26 PM by oddtodd
I won't argue with anyone about their religious beliefs , we all have a choice and reasons behind our scientific or religious sway of the big picture .

One of the things that helped accomodate the advent of science in religion was the idea of a priest/astronomer by the name of Georges LeMatrie who suggested to Einstein the primordial egg . A moment of creation that both sides agree upon .

www.catholiceducation.org...

Whether it be the hand of god , or a scientific anomaly that has brought mankind to our current state can not be argued "convincingly" at this point by either side . (so don't bother me with your faith at the moment please, as I believe in ghosts .... wait a minute you do too !! maybe we are on the same track except for the imposing of rules written by men....)

Until the nature of " The big bang " is understood , science and religion will be at odds , and it is this and ONLY THIS event that will be able to proove or disprove god IMO . We will not see it in our lifetime .


reply posted on 13-7-2004 @ 12:26 AM by SpookyVince
In my opinion, no god ever existed. They are simply a mind thing that people need to explain what is sof far unexplainable. Read my post in this thread about it. I don't believe in any kind of god other that just an idea. I think that LuDaCrIs is quite right when he says that science will disprove all gods one day. And maybe not evolution as such, but just with everything that we don't know yet...


reply posted on 16-10-2004 @ 08:57 PM by Chris McGee
I do not believe in god for the simple reason there is no proof that god exists. The egyptians had their gods, as did the ancient greeks and many other societies. Can you PROVE there is no god of war (mars) or god of love (venus)? Can you PROVE that Osiris wasn't a god? If not then you must accept these beliefs to be equal to your own.

If a scientist tells you material X has certain properties, you tell him to prove it. The deluded religious people are trying to turn this on it's head so that the burden of proof lies upon the atheist. This site explains it quite well:

atheism.about.com...

If the believer is unable to provide good reason to accept the existence of this god, it is unreasonable to expect the atheist to try and construct a proof that it does not exist - or even care very much about the claim in the first place. Such an expectation is only reasonable when the atheist in question has specifically claimed that this or that god does not or cannot exist.




Give me ONE shred of credible evidence and I will convert here and now.


reply posted on 16-10-2004 @ 09:26 PM by SirKillallott
Originally posted by LuDaCrIs
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
To answer the thread topic, I think that science may be able to disprove God in the future, It will be far in the future..... Here is the thing, If they do,(who ever they are) do you think the people of power will let it out that people have been living a lie for atleast 2000 years. No, there would be mass Chaos.........


I really beleive that if god was disproven through science then the world as a whole would be a much better place. Think about all of the barriers we would break down. By all means I dont mean to insult or offend any of you that are religiuos, but i think the world would be a much better place without religion. Or maybe somehow prove that there is only one god, that way everyone beleives in the same thing so there is no conflict in terms of religion.


You may believe what you wish although I would think that many would be very upset (putting lightly) if they found out that they were living a lie for thousands of years. Heck, I get angry when I find out that what I have been ranting on about to my family, friends or co-workers turns out to be wrong and they were right. I feel totally confused, angry, and completely humiliated.

If God were to suddenly be disproved by science, there would be no need for peace. There would be no need for sin. There would be no sins, there would be no barriers. But these barriers that would be let down would be ones that you would quickly wish back. No longer would people believe in a Heaven after death; a haven for which you must behave to gain access. No one would care... There would be no more need to care.

I myself have not spent enough time on religion, but it seems to be a very valuable part of society. Laws do keep me from murder, but ultimately I do not think about a life time in jail but an eternity in hell. Without that to think about what is holding me back? Do not be so quick to judge the powers of religion. Whether real or whether fake, in the end it can be an important wall protecting the pure and the guilty.

With all the time spent on religion to this day, the only way religion could be deemed incorrect, would be if it had not existed at all. Not because of the reality of religion but because of the mark it has left on the human race.

(Final note: Murder has tainted my mind several times during my life. But the only soul I wish to quench is my own)
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
The meaning or point of existence or life
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
Sand Castles and Science
  Posted 10 days ago with 2 member flags