It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by backinblack
People rarely SEE a bomb go off..
It's normally hidden inside something...
So , you agree that the guy in the video simply used a poor choice of words , and didn't actually see any bombs going off ?
Here's a legitimate question..
Are you 100% certain that NO explosives were used on 9/11.?
I am 100% certain that no "explosives" were needed to bring the towers down , once they had been impacted by airplanes trvelling at high speeds , and having suffered intense heat for an extended period of time .
I am 100% certain that "bombs" are not the only thing that go boom .
I am 100% certain that NOBODY has presented solid evidence of bombs or any other type of controlled demolition .
I am 100% certain that claims of this nature are unfounded , minus any supporting evidence .
Therefore , after looking at all of the evidence available , I can safely say that I am 100% certain that no bombs or other type of explosive demolition were used on 9/11 .
aluminium planes can not penetrate thick steel girders, no matter how fast they are travelling.
Pity kamikaze pilots didn't realise they would bounce off steel ships and please don't fire a soft lead bullet at a tin (steel) can because it will bounce right back at you.
Kamikaze pilots would intentionally attempt to crash their aircraft into enemy ships—planes often laden with explosives, bombs, torpedoes and full fuel tanks.
Originally posted by TWILITE22
reply to post by stirling
I find it quite fascinating that the officials did not even think of including bombs in the "official investigation"and that it was only airplanes that supposedly took down the towers.Just by ignoring this fact makes me suspicious,especially since bombs were used the first time the towers were attacked.I find the eyewitnesses(firemen,and others that were there)very credible witnesses,I mean come on these people were up close and personal when this happened and I'm quite sure that the NYC firemen know what bombs sounds like.
Originally posted by ANOK
In a real investigation EVERYTHING is looked at.
Especially when you have buildings completely collapsing, WTC7 into its own footprint, that in itself is evidence of explosives. Or at least enough to warrant an investigation into explosives.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by vipertech0596
In other words, still absolutely no evidence that any of the buildings lost that day were a result of controlled demolitions.
Were they actually looking??
And I'm pretty sure they found evidence of wires unless the building had no power..
Originally posted by gandalphthegrey
Originally posted by starless and bible black
That's just one eyewitness. For every one of these witnesses, there are twelve daves or hoopers who were also there. You know what I mean.
How dare you refute this . If you watch Loose Change , even firefighters were filmed at the scene recounting how they saw a series of detonations prior to the collapse of the towers . These guys were heroes . Are you going to refute their claims too . people like you make me sick .