It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is classified technology and science a hoax?

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 07:32 PM
link   
After watching a very bad History Channel documentary about "Terminator Robots" something struck my attention. They brought up the sentence: "It's difficult to say how far advanced we are in military Robotics because most projects are obviously classified."
Then they moved on unto asking the viewer to extrapolate on what a japanese verbal and gesture communication robot can do. (Powered by artificial neural nets). That is just plain stupid.
They then moved onto showing the NWO quackery futurist Kurzweil demonizing self replicating Robots and concluded that that is the major threat. (Oh hello I visit reprap.org, potential terrorist, mad scientist.)


So how did I come the theory?
Well if you look how these things are represented in the media you almost always are lend to believe that there bunch of hidden technology powered by hidden science out there and that what we are shown is just the tip of the iceberg.
That my friends is a common psychological and sociological tactic. It was used by the nazis for example that's why there are still rumours about nazi ufos today.

There certainly are classified programs, but those are most likely all psychological and cybernetic warfare operations or other cointelpros. There might even be just the program to promote these kind of media manipulations of the mind


And there are other Reasons which support my theory:
Every new scientific discovery is first published to academia not at area 51. So they could just get to the guy which found out about it like they show you in the Stargate TV Series

No.
To decide which scientific discovery can benefit a secret technology one would have to understand it first. And those who would make the decision are higher up in the hierarchy and have chosen power over knowledge. When talking about power I am talking about power from a anarchistic standpoint, so authority is excluded.

So if you accept this logic you would come to the conclusion that conspiracies which would require academic knowledge are not possible. Not to say that almost all of them use universities as recruiting grounds.. But that's a different issue.

The lines of power and authority exist next to each other and they rarely cross. And in practice new Invention and Science is ridiculed by the hierarchy instead of assimilated. I was done throughout history!




posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 07:38 PM
link   
reply to post by kybertech
 


Oh but of course! Theve got all the best tech Stuffed in the Broom closet at Area 51


Then again i imagine a lot of modern technology as we know it may have originated from the salvaged ship at the Roswell crash



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 07:48 PM
link   
reply to post by TedHodgson
 


or they possibly reverse engineered the titanic pure speculation on both sides but do you really think that they would show you everything on the history channel, provide a proper source. they make programmes on everything and right at the end prove #e all



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 07:49 PM
link   
watch out for nano bots there here and ready to reproduce... they have been developing a self replicating nano bots for along time now for health. but whose to say they wont make them to kill?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 07:54 PM
link   
reply to post by nonetruegod
 


Suggesting they reverse engineered the titanic is just plain silly

Wjeres your sources that suggest such technology isnt been utalised at this very minute?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 08:16 PM
link   
reply to post by kybertech
 


No. I'm sorry, but I just can't agree with this one. All governments have their black budget ops, black budget scientists sworn to secrecy, black budget companies, etcetera, etcetera. While a lot of new scientific breakthroughs and discoveries are reviewed and published through academia, there are many instances where knowledge is suppressed. Tesla technology comes to mind. Not only that, but governments often contract out different facets of a project to different scientists and different companies. The goal of this is so that no single person or corporate entity has the complete knowledge of what the big picture is. This scenario reminds me of a movie I saw a few years back. Definitely worth watching if you like Sci-Fi, or the Saw movies. I'll try putting some kind of link.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 08:17 PM
link   
reply to post by kybertech
 


The only problem is that there is secret technology and you don't know about it. Consider the SR71 or even the stealth technology. These were not commonly known for decades. I personally am aware of satellites being able to look down your fireplace or read a paper on your doorstep existing in the early 70s, I don't know how much older the tech was at that time.

Only now have the Chinese created their own stealth fighter, ours is almost 30 years old and that is just the production models. Area 51 is for testing not creating. You have to understand that it can take decades to create the new technologies before mass producing anything; but, the technology is already there. Is it common knowledge that we have planes that can do Mach 10? There are things Tesla created that still have not been released, look up his life and what happened after he died, the government came and took his papers and stuff.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 08:22 PM
link   
That's basically saying every document circulating in the US military classified top-secret, about weaposn is false. That being said, that allso means that over 1/8 th of the classified documents released by Wikileaks are false, and that there are no such thing as classified tech and science in the gov.? Cmon.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 08:43 PM
link   


Is classified technology and science a hoax?


Absolutely not.


Try this search term: Unified Space Vault.



posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 02:00 AM
link   
The SR71 is a good example. The concorde is basically as old and they would have been developed at the same time.

Mind you the theory does not exclude military use of existing technology, up or downscaled. If the principle is the same thats not really "the things we dream up according to the media"

As for stealth technology that could have been greatly exaggerated. But might be a worth a shot... I will look into it.

Tesla is a different issue and I've research the issue quite a bit.
He was in a unique situation where he was in direct contact with jp morgan. So yes that might be a some sort of hole in the theory. The issue with Tesla is that he wasn't doing academic research and thus was in reach by individuals like him.
But it might be that the phenomena which would have powered the wardencliff tower is all there is. (Whatever it is)

People like John Huchinson which sort of claim to step into his footsteps I have the strong suspicion of being a Fraud. I've tried contacting him (or whoever runs the site) and no answer there. Videos of floating cannonballs, flocked metal, etc could have been fabricated with more advanced magicians tricks.
But we can guess along time on this one.

In particular I suspect things like Time Travel, Teleportation, Antigravity and Remote viewing no beeing implemented in any fashion on Earth.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join