It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by badgerprints
Ah,
But most of these organizations were pushing for Obamacare. Did they know beforehand that they would get the waiver?
Originally posted by centurion1211
reply to post by jibeho
Interesting how none of the members that were so vocal in their support of o-bow-macare seem to want anything to do with trying to defend this part of it.
Without waivers, companies would have had to provide a minimum of $750,000 in coverage next year, increasing to $1.25 million in 2012, $2 million in 2013 and unlimited in 2014.
"The big political issue here is the president promised no one would lose the coverage they've got," says Robert Laszewski, chief executive officer of consulting company Health Policy and Strategy Associates. "Here we are a month before the election, and these companies represent 1 million people who would lose the coverage they've got."
The waiver program is intended to provide continuous coverage until 2014, when government-organized marketplaces will offer insurance subsidized by tax credits, says HHS spokeswoman Jessica Santillo.
Three additional locals of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU)--an organization whose political action committee spent $27 million in independent expenditures promoting Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign--received one-year waivers exempting them from complying with a provision in the new health care law.
That brings to six the total number of SEIU locals that have received waivers from Obamacare.
How about a couple of additional SEIU waivers while were at it. Three more in addition to the 3 SEIU waivers that were just granted. Any Obamacare defenders care to chime in. Please defend these waivers!!
HHS posted 126 new waivers on Friday, bringing the total to 1,040 organizations that have been granted a one-year exemption from a new coverage requirement included in the healthcare reform law enacted almost a year ago. Waivers have become a hot-button issue for Republicans, eager to expose any vulnerabilities in the reform law.
In order to avoid disruption in the insurance market, the healthcare overhaul gives HHS the power to grant waivers to firms that cannot meet new annual coverage limits in 2011. The waivers have typically been granted to so-called "mini-med" plans that offer limited annual coverage — as low as $2,000 — that would fall short of meeting the new annual coverage floor of $750,000 in 2011.
The waivers are meant as a stopgap measure until new state-run insurance exchanges open in 2014. Annual dollar limits will also be abolished by then.
Originally posted by centurion1211
With almost 2,200,000 workers exempted from all the "benefits" of Obamacare, exactly who is going to get stuck with this.
Also, if you read the list of organizations with waivers, notice all the big labor unions and health care providers?
source
How can anyone still think obamacare is a good idea?
edit on 1/26/2011 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by Matrix Rising
Who does the GOP (that's whose view this is and clearly not yours) think they are to tell anyone that they do not have the right to have protection over their health insurance provider