It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Coverup of Barak Obama's lack of U.S. Citizenship?

page: 1
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 03:44 PM
link   
Just heard this radio interview of Mike Evans (a celebrity journalist) where he says his long-time friend Neil Ambercrombe (now governor of Hawaii) told him that he's used his powers as Governor to search high and low but he's been unable to find any evidence of President Obama being born in the state:



But then he suddenly puts out a "Oh wait I was wrong" press release apologizing saying he simply "misspoke" before about the Governor and it was all just a big mistake.

Fox News

Listening to the interview, Mike seems pretty clear of what he remembers, and he also sounds pretty clear of the implications.

... Has Mike Evans been pressured to shut up and go away?

Has Neil Ambercrombe been forced to keep quiet?




posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   
Thread in Progress
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Edit: I see this is a new take on the story. Sorry.

This is hilarious! What the hell is going on??? Seems like someone was looking for ratings or something.
edit on 1/26/2011 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


I knew you would come on here and deny it! BWAHAHAH!!!! Nothing against your messiah will ever be legit will it?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 03:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Thread in Progress
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Edit: I see this is a new take on the story. Sorry.

This is hilarious! What the hell is going on??? Seems like someone was looking for ratings or something.
edit on 1/26/2011 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)


I'm not so sure. He was in the middle of talking about mundane celebrity gossip when he popped this out - almost like "oh by the way..."

But now he's suddenly very remorseful and serious about it??/



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 04:00 PM
link   
reply to post by gncnew
 


He does seem to know intimate knowledge of "barry's " past.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


If you read the Fox link in the OP he explains that what he did was read a "story" online about how niether hospital can find the Long Form etc. and he embellished by saying he called the Govs "Office"...which he did, but never got a call back.Never spoke with the Gov.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 05:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


I knew you would come on here and deny it!


WTF are you talking about? I denied nothing! What did I deny?


Originally posted by gncnew
But now he's suddenly very remorseful and serious about it??/


I know. It's weird. Almost like his arm got twisted and so he took the story back... Who knows what the real story is?

reply to post by maybereal11
 


So, you think the part about talking to the gov was just an embellishment? Could be, I suppose. Then when it became big news, he retracted it... Crazy people!

edit on 1/26/2011 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 06:03 PM
link   
reply to post by gncnew
 


This is a test. I just tried to post to this thread and I got a weird IE window and my post vanished.

SeaWind



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 06:16 PM
link   
I have to ask, bc I really do not understand the whole birther movement. I get the basics, they believe that a certificate of live birth does not a birth certificate make and want the actual certificate.

Now, what I don't understand is why the certificate of live birth is not enough for them? Two even IF Obama would or lie about his place of birth, why would the the entire U.S. government go along with it?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by gncnew
Just heard this radio interview of Mike Evans (a celebrity journalist) where he says his long-time friend Neil Ambercrombe (now governor of Hawaii) told him that he's used his powers as Governor to search high and low but he's been unable to find any evidence of President Obama being born in the state:



But then he suddenly puts out a "Oh wait I was wrong" press release apologizing saying he simply "misspoke" before about the Governor and it was all just a big mistake.

Fox News

Listening to the interview, Mike seems pretty clear of what he remembers, and he also sounds pretty clear of the implications.

... Has Mike Evans been pressured to shut up and go away?

Has Neil Ambercrombe been forced to keep quiet?


Gncnew, thanks for the link. I listened to the radio interview on the video. The mystery deepens. I never questioned that Obama was born in Hawaii. I remember when I thought the "Birthers" were irrational haters, until I took the time to look at their complaints. The Birthers actually have legitimate complaints. Of course, the MSM has dismissed them as racist nutters.

If Neil Abercrombie (?) remembers Obama as a five or six year old, that must have been before "Barry" was taken to Indonesia with Soetoro in 1967. (Stanley Ann divorced Obama Sr in 1964, I think.)

There are so many odd things about the Stanley Ann & Obama Sr. pairing. One of the things is that they had an almost secret wedding in Maui. They were both students at the U of Hawaii East-West Center on Oahu. That's where their friends from campus would be. Why have the wedding on Maui?

One thing that struck me was the fact that Obama Sr already had a wife in Kenya. The Kenyan wife was pregnant with their second child when Obama Sr. left for Hawaii.

Were their friends on campus fully aware that Obama Sr, ALREADY HAD A WIFE? Would they have objected to the marriage, if they had known of the wedding?

Stanley Ann was pregnant and needed a husband (being an unwed mother in 1961 was a big deal). The official story is that Obama Sr. never told Stanley Ann that he already had a wife until AFTER the wedding. I wonder.

Getting back to main topic: Why is there no original BC?

SeaWind



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 07:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by searching4truth
I have to ask, bc I really do not understand the whole birther movement. I get the basics, they believe that a certificate of live birth does not a birth certificate make and want the actual certificate.

Now, what I don't understand is why the certificate of live birth is not enough for them? Two even IF Obama would or lie about his place of birth, why would the the entire U.S. government go along with it?



Searching4truth, there are strange things about the C of LB, why is the certificate # blacked out? No one could use the certificate # for fraud. But if the certificate # were shown, it could be traced back by investigators.

One of the things that troubled me about the Obama candidacy, was this man came out of nowhere (no national or international political experience) and he is backed by extremely POWERFUL people (Kennedy, Kerry, etc.). Why?

There have to be a reasons why TPTB wanted Obama as POTUS, and we are not being told the truth.

Why were Obama's records sealed? Anyone who asked/asks questions was/is smeared as a "racist."

SeaWind



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 07:30 PM
link   
reply to post by SeaWind
 


LOL I think your problem is that fact your using IE
or as everyone in the tech world knows it as
"the worst browser around".

on topic- I do find it strange as well.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 07:45 PM
link   
I am a left leaner, but a lot of things have bothered me about the President. He is not against free trade, which has flushed the US down the proverbial toilet. I did not listen to his speach by-the-way, but I heard he made fun of people's upset at the TSA fascist demonics who chortle and drool while sexualy molesting and assaulting people, and forcing ancient elderly with colostomy bags, to "get up" out of those wheel chairs, etc. I am convinced that his identity is a confusion. At the same time we want his birth certificate, ( I have mine, with "the raised seal on it" ) he is 8 cousins-related to Dick Cheney. www.timesonline.co.uk...



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by SeaWind

Originally posted by searching4truth
I have to ask, bc I really do not understand the whole birther movement. I get the basics, they believe that a certificate of live birth does not a birth certificate make and want the actual certificate.

Now, what I don't understand is why the certificate of live birth is not enough for them? Two even IF Obama would or lie about his place of birth, why would the the entire U.S. government go along with it?



Searching4truth, there are strange things about the C of LB, why is the certificate # blacked out? No one could use the certificate # for fraud. But if the certificate # were shown, it could be traced back by investigators.

One of the things that troubled me about the Obama candidacy, was this man came out of nowhere (no national or international political experience) and he is backed by extremely POWERFUL people (Kennedy, Kerry, etc.). Why?

There have to be a reasons why TPTB wanted Obama as POTUS, and we are not being told the truth.

Why were Obama's records sealed? Anyone who asked/asks questions was/is smeared as a "racist."

SeaWind



Yes, I can understand that, except for one minor point. I don't see birthers (as in actual protesters, not atser) asserting that Obama is a pawn of the NWO or TPTB. They are largely either tea partiers or republicans (conservatives), I knew see them answer why the Republicans or McCain specifically didn't bring this forth during the election.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 09:36 PM
link   
What real difference does it make if he is or is not an American? What, in all the world, are people going to do about it? I am so sick and tired of hearing about this. Even if he is not, what are the American people going to do? I'll tell what they are going to do, nothing. If he is, still people will do nothing. Remember, the majority rules, and the majority voted him in. Deal with it. They wanted just a bag of promises. That's all. Anything that will make them feel secure in their life. What a bunch of sheep. You'll vote for anyone with a brand new bag of tricks. Here's your lucky charms....You want something better? Then stand your ground. Stop being sheep and be human for once. The choice is in the American people's hands. After all, we all make our own beds right?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 09:59 PM
link   
reply to post by krakencampbell
 


If it is found that Obama is in fact ineligible for the POTUS, he will be removed from office, not by the American people but by the laws of the United States.

Every bill he signed into law will become void and he will face federal charges.

The majority won't win if he's found ineligible. In fact, the majority will lose.

It doesn't matter if the entire United States wants him as POTUS. If he is not within the confines of the Constitution, then he is ineligible. Plain and simple.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 10:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Intelearthling
 


If he is truly ineligible why has Congress not acted upon it? Why at the beginning of the month did Boehner come out and say that Obama is a citizen?

This would be the Republicans dream, they rid of the Dem in office and get all his policies thrown out without actually having to repeal anything, and until an election can be held Boehner would be acting president.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 11:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by searching4truth
I have to ask, bc I really do not understand the whole birther movement. I get the basics, they believe that a certificate of live birth does not a birth certificate make and want the actual certificate.

Now, what I don't understand is why the certificate of live birth is not enough for them? Two even IF Obama would or lie about his place of birth, why would the the entire U.S. government go along with it?



One, we have not seen the actual document at all; only a copy posted online, and Obama fights tooth and nail to keep from having to show the real deal in court, where the matter could be so easily settled. If he's got the document, why not march into court and prove it already? Close the matter. Now, the governor can't locate the original, and they are talking about how a newspaper announcement is "proof". hardly! Under that set of standards, I want new ID, if I simply announce in a paper that I am someone else.

Two, very good question. One researcher has discovered several SSNs with the same name, or a slight spelling variation, for Barack Obama. Recall, if you will, that when he first came onto the public scene, he spelled his name "Barak"? I recall that well, but now, you can't locate any articles on the spelling change. Multiple SSNs are a common thing for CIA operatives and others associated with that organization to use. If that's the reason for it, we aren't going to hear why. However, we could be shown a birth certificate, which seems to be missing. If I can't get a driver's license, register a child for school, etc, without my birth certificate, why should a candidate for president of the country not have to show his? There are eligibility laws, and so far, he's dodged the issue.

I don't know what the man is hiding, but who fights so hard to hide nothing?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 11:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by searching4truth
reply to post by Intelearthling
 


If he is truly ineligible why has Congress not acted upon it? Why at the beginning of the month did Boehner come out and say that Obama is a citizen?

This would be the Republicans dream, they rid of the Dem in office and get all his policies thrown out without actually having to repeal anything, and until an election can be held Boehner would be acting president.


The Republicans, as well as the Democrats, know the chaos and unimaginable social rifts are the consequences of removing Obama from the position of POTUS. This is the main reason everyone in Washington will 'shoot down' any investigation into the matter. Simply put, they are avoiding potential mayhem and assured riots.

Proving his ineligibilty when his term is up or voted from office will be easier and then the process of striking any laws he signed will be met with less resistance.

By that time, hopefully, he'll have moved out of the country, never to return.



posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 01:35 AM
link   
How many times must this be said , I'll even use caps so that it can be understood,

OBAMA WAS BORN IN HAWAII IN AUG 1961 MAKING HIM A LEGAL, UNITED STATES CITIZEN BY BIRTHRIGHT THUS ENABLING HIM TO BE THE 44TH POTUS.

IT IS TRUE THAT HE DID LIVE IN KENYA AND INDONESIA BUT AS CERTAIN RULES STATE HIS MOTHER (HIS LEGAL GUARDIAN AND PARENT) NEVER RELINQUISHED EITHER HIS OR HER LEGAL CITIZENSHIP STATUS AS YOU CAN LIVE OUTSIDE OF THE NATION FOR 25 YEARS BUT AS LONG AS YOU DO NOT FILE SOMETHING CALLED A "CITIZENSHIP RELINQUISHMENT" FORM VIA THE US STATE DEPT. YOU RETAIN YOUR LEGAL CITIZENSHIP.

TROLL ALERT, TROLL ALERT, TROLL ALERT. GO AWAY BIRTHER!




top topics



 
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join