It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No one is arguing the TSA can’t do anything, the argument is that, whatever they decide to do, it must be within the Constitutional constraints.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
This is SIMPLE - To drive a car you are required to wear a seat belt.. You may not like it.. But you MUST!
What would make it unconstitutional? Surely you can’t be saying there is no limit to what they can do.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I'm not at all sure that the TSA and airlines agreement is unconstitutional at all. I DON'T like the policy and won't participate, but that doesn't make it unconstitutional. Just disliked.
This is SIMPLE - To drive a car you are required to wear a seat belt.. You may not like it.. But you MUST!
When you buy Sudafed at the drug store - You MUST show ID!
When you go to Chucky Cheese, you get yours, and your children's hands stamped.
To board a plane, you must go through a search.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by loam
It truly is remarkable you see shelter, movement and self-sufficiency as "privileges".
Since I didn't say that AT ALL, I can only assume that you are twisting my words to upset me.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
When we operate in a society, we have to make concessions for certain privileges.
...
I don't HAVE to fly, drive, work or own a home, but if I CHOOSE to, there are things I have to do in return."
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Sorry, it's what I expect of you. Following me around trying to irritate me. You bored at work or something? You've been doing it for years now. I expect it. It doesn't surprise me. What does surprise me is the apologies and claims of friendship that usually come afterward. You truly baffle me!
And please don't send me a blubbering apologetic U2U, all right? Thanks.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Yes, Loam, I'm a Nazi. The jig is up. You've found me out.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
Youre tolerant,
I'm really not.
When I walk into the security area of the airport, I am consenting to be searched. Because that is the policy of the Airport and I am aware of that. If someone walks up to me on the street and tries to search me, yes, THAT would be an invasion of my rights.
I'm not at all sure that the TSA and airlines agreement is unconstitutional at all. I DON'T like the policy and won't participate, but that doesn't make it unconstitutional. Just disliked.
Can you say "holier than thou"
First of all.. I was speaking of the offense taken by his one single comment about pat downs.. The ACLU really is that upset? That is ridiculous!!!!
I am not telling people how to feel, just disappointed and surprised. Am I allowed to have an opinion, without having to be talked down to by you?
You have the right to say no.. You have the right to not fly! You know what is expected to get on the plane.... If you don't like it DON'T FLY.. It is that easy. Flying is not your right.. It is a privilege to fly on someone's plane. If it was your plane, you could make the rules, but it is not.
It is not as if they are giving you a handy in the airport.. Do you think these people doing the searches are happy they have to touch your junk?
You made a statement about 100 years of successful travel without these new precautions.. You are either intentionally leaving out important info.. Or are simply ignorant.. Adapt and change with the changing times..
Why is this hard to grasp? Why is it so unacceptable? If you didn't like the hand stamp at chucky cheese, you would simply not go right? If you didn't want to show your ID for your Sudafed purchase, you would simply not buy it!
Things have changed drastically in the last 30 to 40 years. Terrorists and people that are determined to deliver a blow to America, have made it clear that airplanes are a target. If you can't see the need for increased security when it comes to airlines and airline policy, you are naive.
ohhh noooo my rights are deteriorating... I have no more rights. I believe in standing up for our rights.. But some folks take it way to far! Jared laughner would be a good example of a American that let paranoia turn into delusion..
I bet there are a bunch more loose screws that are slowly getting more and more paranoid, to the point of delusions.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
I wonder, if Benevolent heretic was ok with the idea, when she decided to travel regardless of the means, that the TSA could take the pat downs a step further....say..taking her to the room and exploring her innards?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I do NOT approve of the policy at airports. My argument is that these pat-downs are not unconstitutional, as far as I know. It is the policy of the airport and because I don't approve of the policy (i.e. it's NOT OK with me) I choose not to fly.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
As if I don't know what the 4th Amendment says
The right of the people to be secure in their persons
It is NOT unreasonable to search someone
I have the right to determine what I believe is right and right for me and to pursue that in any fashion I believe is right and right for me.
Wrong and wrong, I would refuse the handstamp and enter anyway, I would demand that the product be supplied, and yes, in both your examples I have done this, and I have to tell you the Sudafed thing really ticked me off, and had the store not complied with my wishes may have led to an open declaration of war by me on the State!
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Have you flown in the last decade and half?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Now, what's your beef?
2. It's NOT unreasonable to search someone when they are going to board a plane. The second part of that sentence is necessary.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Last time i checked, the Constitution was and is the Supreme law of the land? It supersedes all other laws, regulations..etc...