It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Have you ever seen me "demand it"? I think he ought to release it
Arizona wants to see documentation for 2012 Presidential candidates based on this legislation, but even Arizona isn't demanding it.
If Obama doesn't run in 2012 there's no provision in this bill that demands to see anything from Obama.
BIRTH SHORT
A certified birth certificate that can typically be used for travel, passport, proof of citizenship, social security, driver's license, school registration, personal identification and other legal purposes. The Birth Certificate - Short is available for events that occurred within the State of Arizona from 1990 to present.
BIRTH LONG
A certified birth certificate that can typically be used for travel, passport, proof of citizenship, social security, driver's license, school registration, personal identification and other legal purposes. The Birth Certificate - Long is available for events that occurred within the State of Arizona from 1903 to 1989.
Originally posted by TheFlash
Why is Obama the only President who has ever caused all this fervor over a birth certificate? Do you know where John McCain was born? Have you ever seen the birth certificate of ANY other President? I would like to see ANY evidence that Obama was NOT born in the USA if anyone can find any.
McCain was sued and all the lawsuits were dismissed by lack of standing of the plaintiff, just like with the Obama lawsuits.
Originally posted by TheAmused
Yes Mcain got sued to prove he was eligible to run for president. and won.
How ironic that you are here demanding “100% proof” — whatever that means — about Obama and you are completely ignorant in respect to McCain, but point to McCain as an example of what Obama should have done.
he was born in panama to a military family. on a military base.
I thought the birthers argued Obama isn’t eligible because he doesn’t fulfill the natural-born citizen clause, and all you have said about McCain is completely irrelevant to that question.
Originally posted by TheAmused
Mcain was born in a military family ...
His father was fighting for our great country....
He was born at the base he was stationed at...
I didn’t demand anyone’s birth certificate. I am on record saying I am against the natural-born citizen clause, so as a matter of personal preference, I could care less about McCain’s birth certificate.
As i said before did you demand mcain's long form birth certificate when he fought and was a POW for this country?dang hypocrite's.
Most of the Obama lawsuits had standing problems, but apparently at least one petitioner, Hollister, had standing:
Originally posted by aptness
McCain was sued and all the lawsuits were dismissed by lack of standing of the plaintiff, just like with the Obama lawsuits.
Lawyers working for a retired military officer who is challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president say the U.S. Supreme Court appears to have broken its own rules by failing to respond to a pending recusal motion, thus conceding the point and possibly requiring a new conference vote among the seven remaining justices, including four mostly conservative, on whether the high court will hear arguments over Obama's legitimacy...
This case doesn't have the "standing" dispute that has brought failure to so many other challenges to Obama's eligibility, the pleading explains, because Robertson "found that it had jurisdiction of the case, and therefore that petitioner Hollister had standing."
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by TheAmused
Has anybody read the actual law? It does not require the original birth certificate neither is the first time birther legislation has gotten this far. I understand, you want Obama to show you his birth certificate because you all don't like him, I get it, but this ain't going anywhere.
Here is a suggestion, lobby congress.
Originally posted by OhZone
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by TheAmused
Has anybody read the actual law? It does not require the original birth certificate neither is the first time birther legislation has gotten this far. I understand, you want Obama to show you his birth certificate because you all don't like him, I get it, but this ain't going anywhere.
Here is a suggestion, lobby congress.
So if we liked him it would be OK with you that he was born in Kenya?
Its all right with you that we just over look the rules so long as we like the guy?
Oh no, it’s a conspiracy!
The order on Jan. 18 from the high court simply listed case 10-678, Hollister, Gregory S. v. Soetoro, Barry, et al as "denied" with no explanation.
Also, from Wong Kim Ark—
The fundamental principle of the common law with regard to English nationality was birth within the allegiance, also called "ligealty," "obedience," "faith," or "power" of the King. The principle embraced all persons born within the King's allegiance and subject to his protection. Such allegiance and protection were mutual -- as expressed in the maxim protectio trahit subjectionem, et subjectio protectionem -- and were not restricted to natural-born subjects and naturalized subjects, or to those who had taken an oath of allegiance, but were predicable of aliens in amity so long as they were within the kingdom. Children, born in England, of such aliens were therefore natural-born subjects.
Still from Wong Kim Ark—
It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.
Yet from Wong Kim Ark—
All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England (...) We find no warrant for the opinion that this great principle of the common law has ever been changed in the United States. It has always obtained here with the same vigor, and subject only to the same exceptions, since as before the Revolution.
So far as we are informed, there is no authority, legislative, executive or judicial, in England or America, which maintains or intimates that the statutes (whether considered as declaratory or as merely prospective) conferring citizenship on foreign-born children of citizens have superseded or restricted, in any respect, the established rule of citizenship by birth within the dominion. Even those authorities in this country, which have gone the farthest towards holding such statutes to be but declaratory of the common law have distinctly recognized and emphatically asserted the citizenship of native-born children of foreign parents.
On her birth in New York, the plaintiff became a citizen of the United States. In a comprehensive review of the principles and authorities governing the decision in that case -- that a child born here of alien parentage becomes a citizen of the United States -- the Court adverted to the "inherent right of every independent nation to determine for itself, and according to its own constitution and laws, what classes of persons shall be entitled to its citizenship." As municipal law determines how citizenship may be acquired, it follows that persons may have a dual nationality. And the mere fact that the plaintiff may have acquired Swedish citizenship by virtue of the operation of Swedish law on the resumption of that citizenship by her parents does not compel the conclusion that she has lost her own citizenship acquired under our law.
Because I’m not in favor of your cause I must “like Obama”? Sir, I invite you to read the relevant posts I have made in the past regarding what I think of Obama and his policies. You assume too much.
Originally posted by TheAmused
Just cause you like obama doesn't make it ok
My argument is backed up by the Supreme Court cases I just cited and quoted above — and that your little chart claims backs up their claims — and by the fact that you bithers have yet to present any credible and tangible evidence to demonstrate that Obama wasn’t born in the United Sates.
and that is your whole argument in a nutshell.
Originally posted by TheFlash
Why is Obama the only President who has ever caused all this fervor over a birth certificate? Do you know where John McCain was born? Have you ever seen the birth certificate of ANY other President? I would like to see ANY evidence that Obama was NOT born in the USA if anyone can find any.
I never said it was uncommon, what I said was that not all cases had been dismissed for lack of standing as you implied, and in this case, (the Robertson decision that led up to the Supreme court appeal), Robertson decided something to the effect that Americans had already diligently determined the president's eligibility on twitter among other places (he didn't mention ATS for some reason??? ) so he didn't need to see a birth certificate. That is what sounds like the conspiracy, how the hell can a judge refer to twitter as a means of confirming the president's eligibility, instead of seeing the actual birth certificate?
Originally posted by aptness
reply to post by Arbitrageur
You should really reconsider all that time you waste on WND.
Oh no, it’s a conspiracy!
The order on Jan. 18 from the high court simply listed case 10-678, Hollister, Gregory S. v. Soetoro, Barry, et al as "denied" with no explanation.
It’s not uncommon for the Supreme Court to refuse to hear a case without explanation.
Originally posted by TheAmused
Yes Mcain got sued to prove he was eligible to run for president.
and won.