posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 06:06 PM
This one took a whopping 1 hour and ten minutes before it was subject to the hoax bin.
Which is interesting, because the original thread was not labeled a hoax
Ooops, maybe I shouldn't have said that, or else now it will be called a hoax, too.
Here is the issue. I came to some of my own conclusions as to why the judge may be the target, as you can see from my signature, so when I saw this
thread the first time, I became intrigued, until I did some research and found that the case they were talking about does not mention anything about
401k's, but the site it came from was a pay site with not much information. Bottom line is, I am skeptical, but for the heavy hand of ATS to label it
a hoax is in my opinion wrong.
Let's say it is a hoax, perhaps it is an example of the powers that be poisoning the pot, sort of like what happened with the fake Kenyan birth
certificate? Maybe this story is false, but it is a hoax meant to distract from the real issue? Isn't that a possibility? Can't we debate the issue
as to why it might be a hoax?