Something Is Happening At Glacier Peak, Washington NOW (1/25/11)

page: 3
110
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 10:24 PM
link   
So go HERE and pull up the seismo for station SOS. This is at Helens. It is showing something at the same time....

Then do the same thing for station VLL....this is Mt Hood. Same thing. What the Heck??!!
edit on 25-1-2011 by westcoast because: (no reason given)


Edit to add: Okay guys....now I'm REALLY wondering. Pull up MBW and look at 12 hrs. (24 hrs if you look at this on the 26th) It shows up VERY strong there. That is Mount Baker....

Puterman??
edit on 25-1-2011 by westcoast because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 10:34 PM
link   
Well this is all interesting with the posts about possible Harmonic Seismic activity at Yellowstone. The seismic activity in your area, and then to top it off a good reference site seems to have stopped all together.

hisz.rsoe.hu...


Volcano Activity Report Service Stopped The volcano information system has been shut down. Our information source we use has ceased, so the EDIS RSOE own information and monitoring system development has begun.



posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 10:35 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


I go offline for a couple hours and it seems I risk missing the whole West coast sliding into the Pacific. Again, I wanna throw out there that, even though the Glacier Peak activity was earlier, and more significant, the 1.9 near Seattle could be related (and would indicate a much larger area that could be affected), especially considering the rest of the activity in the area that you just posted. Not that it matters really, I just started with that premise, I might as well follow through with it.

If anything, it makes me glad I live on the other coast...though, we've got our own stuff to keep our eyes on.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 12:45 AM
link   
reply to post by CLPrime
 


Well, I certainly hope we have awhile (say,,,,a million years??
) until we slide into the ocean!!! But I get your point.


Yes, I agree that all these mini quakes as late may be a bigger indicator. Also of note, there was another 174 deep tremor epicenters located today HERE . (please see that thread in my sig line for more info) This is again a lot, and yesterday there were over three hundred. It is spread up all along the coast rather than clustered like normal.

something is afoot!!!



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 12:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Phantom28804
 


Yup, and Puterman mentioned he was unable to pull info from IRIS and I was unable to load up arrays off GEE today. Coincidence? (probably
)



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:02 AM
link   
i have a notifier on gogle chrome for earthquakes n there was an earth quake in idaho with 0.1 depth im pretty sure thats not normal right ???



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:20 AM
link   
West coast, outstanding work! I'm in Puyallup, WA and would have no clue this was going on if not for your updates. We down here in the shadow of mt rainier tend to forget about the other sleeping monster that lerks to the north.

Now, if only I could read those darn graphs!



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:25 AM
link   
Bellingham, Wa. here...

very close to the danger zone, if not in it already... In the past, some people have discussed the possible fallout for Bellingham if Glacier Peak or Mt. Baker were to erupt, and it was said that mudslides could easily reach the coastline causing widespread damage...



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:27 AM
link   
good find you would make a good seismologist, go to this link and see today's activity www.pnsn.org... the link works just fine self explanatory easy to use helps to have note book to keep track of web recorder stations side note click one circle at a time until you get the hang of it seems the NW is active, eq's 2.+ all over the place, could the range be up too some thing?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:31 AM
link   
reply to post by darkpassenger23
 


Yup, saw that quake just a bit ago. It is VERY shallow for a mag 3+ quake, but not unheard of. I am not familiar with the seismic history of that area though, so I really can't say. It has been reviewed twice, so I imagine that depth might stick...you normally see those shallow ones changed after review.

Mount saint helens had a 1.9 quake I see this afternoon, and now two more micro quakes not far from there all in less than two hours. So there is a lot of little shakes happening.

MAP 1.9 2011/01/25 23:41:20 46.198 -122.191 2.3 1 km ( 1 mi) WSW of Mount St. Helens Volcano, WA
MAP 1.5 2011/01/25 22:43:25 46.080 -122.881 22.5 3 km ( 2 mi) N of Prescott, OR
MAP 1.8 2011/01/25 21:54:01 47.314 -122.383 27.6 3 km ( 2 mi) W of Federal Way, WA
MAP 1.2 2011/01/25 12:22:00 45.964 -122.841 21.2 5 km ( 3 mi) S of Kalama, WA
MAP 1.1 2011/01/24 22:13:55 47.085 -121.939 14.5 8 km ( 5 mi) E of Carbonado, WA
MAP 1.3 2011/01/24 11:38:06 47.721 -120.477 0.0 20 km ( 12 mi) NE of Leavenworth, WA
MAP 2.0 2011/01/24 09:16:03 47.773 -122.462 27.5 4 km ( 2 mi) SE of Kingston, WA
MAP 1.1 2011/01/24 03:59:01 46.091 -122.506 15.7 21 km ( 13 mi) N of Amboy, WA
MAP 1.6 2011/01/22 22:08:11 46.353 -122.273 16.7 18 km ( 11 mi) NNW of Mount St. Helens Volcano, WA
MAP 1.2 2011/01/22 00:34:49 46.576 -122.407 16.3 8 km ( 5 mi) NE of Mossyrock, WA
MAP 1.1 2011/01/21 13:51:15 48.168 -121.629 11.9 10 km ( 6 mi) S of Darrington, WA
MAP 1.3 2011/01/20 10:48:43 48.206 -122.208 14.8 4 km ( 2 mi) E of Silvana, WA
MAP 2.7 2011/01/20 03:04:53 46.796 -124.288 38.4 15 km ( 9 mi) W of Grayland, WA
MAP 1.0 2011/01/19 20:44:46 47.200 -123.278 7.5 13 km ( 8 mi) W of Shelton, WA
MAP 1.3 2011/01/19 20:27:03 47.662 -120.110 7.1 3 km ( 2 mi) WNW of Waterville, WA


SOURCE



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:31 AM
link   
I'll definitely be watching this thread, it made me jump out of my seat! Look at that scale!

S&F!



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:35 AM
link   
reply to post by bekod
 


Yup, that is one of the sites I have been listing. It is one of my favorites.

Cool thing to do is to select the option to plot by depth. Try it. It clearly defines which quakes lie in what zone. Note all the volcanic stuff is the shallowist in the blue!



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:36 AM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


If that peak decides to blow its top off...go to this link:

FEMA



www.fema.gov...

This will guide you to what to do BEFORE, DURING, & AFTER a volcanic eruption. Who knows, you may want to research the nearest FEMA Camp near you. I hear they are established to "protect" you.


I am able to see Mt. Baker from where I live. I sure don't hope to see or feel seismic activity from that volcano
edit on 26-1-2011 by Skywatcher2011 because: (no reason given)
edit on 26-1-2011 by Skywatcher2011 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:47 AM
link   
well i don't think i will be getting any sleep check this out earthquake.usgs.gov... look at the us map and see for your self then play with the click to launch app it is well worth it!!!!!
edit on 26-1-2011 by bekod because: word corection



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Skywatcher2011
 
no to much activity to be just one volcano i think it has more to do with the fault zone yes it could make a volcano be come more active but the depth and wave is more fault zone look at Ca, and then the big yellow spot (square at the coast ) of WA? OR? cant remember which one then look east UT and ID had some shakers as well.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:54 AM
link   
reply to post by CLPrime
 


If one looks carefully at all the other most recent updates on the volcano activities, you can clearly notice that Yellowstone National Park hasn't been updated since 1/1/2011!!!!! That's over 25 days it has gone while all the others have recent or within a week-recent enough material.

Is it possible they are hiding new data? Has anyone else seen or heard of the recent activity in other threads or have statistical reads on YSNP?

Most recent I heard is that the ground bulged 10inches...



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:56 AM
link   
reply to post by Phantom28804
 




but it looks like they haven't updated since the 21st


The USGS site's "Recent Earthquakes" page has been wonky for a while.
I've found a detour- go to the "Real-time map" and then select an "Earthquake List" M2.5-4.5+ or M5+

OR! I made the link for you.

M2.5 - 4.5+ list
M5+


I am within 200 miles of the New Madrid fault line.
edit on 26-1-2011 by AlphaBette because: blarg



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:56 AM
link   
magnitude 2 quakes



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:58 AM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 
if your wondering why i re-posted your link to "pnsn" it was braking now and then thought you would like to know kind of hard to do research when your link goes oops in the middle of finding stuff eh? S$F to you



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 01:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by westcoastI went for a brief walk a bit ago since the sun came out and I needed to get away from this computer. The rumbling was quite loud. I think I'm getting paranoid though. I saw some strange clouds and two really nice sun dogs (some people call them earthquake clouds). I only had my phone with me and by the time I got back and had my good camera it was gone. I managed to get a so-so shot with my phone, for any that are interested....


Dare I say it? Should I say it? Oh to hell with it, why not.......

HAARP!!!!!!


edit on 26-1-2011 by Skywatcher2011 because: added picture





new topics
top topics
 
110
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join