Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by ThreeDeuce
Stereologist, how can you say that a metal's melting point
is NOT chemistry?
A rather silly straw man argument in which you claimed transmutation.
Let's refresh your rather short memory.
You stated:
Also, remember the molten steel which
would not have become molten with jet fuel.
I replied:
A meaningless claim since there was no or little
molten steel.
Go back to 6th grade. Chemistry is not involved.
The latter was in response to the lie that there was lots of molten steel.
The issue is that you posted an ignorant lie about molten steel.
There was little molten steel. To suggest that jet fuel could not
have created what wasn't there is a wacko story.
So instead of making false claims about my expertise try
being truthful.
As for the plane maneuvers being too advanced for training pilots,
there was a research study done with flight simulators.
Experienced aviators were not able to do said maneuvers with
such large an aircraft.
Because you are easily duped by these false claims tells
us plenty about your inability to discern reality from the
fantasies presented to you.
-------------------------------------------------------------
As for the beams appearing to have been cut by thermite:
Look at the precise diagonal cut in this beam from 9/11.
A stress fracture would not be this clean and precise.
That was not a thermite cut. It was cut after the incident.
Wow you are easily duped.
Add to this a complete lack of education...He is running into threads telling everybody to get back to study because no one understands a thing without Stereo's help.
Who are you, some sort of mega genius?
Licking his ass pretty well dude...He is only interesting in destroying threads WITHOUT bringing any real evidence...He has been challenged by people who know what they're talking about, differently from him...
Maybe you should go back to 6th grade.. How would the tower collapse if the steel did not get hot enough to melt and fail.
The fact is though the designer and builders said that the tower should've withstood the impact. /quote]
Where did you get this idiot claim from? What hoax site did this come from?
---------------------------
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by mb2591
The Quoran says that? I don't believe you.
I think you are repeating some hoax you read on the internet.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by mb2591
Maybe you should go back to 6th grade.. How would the tower collapse if the steel did not get hot enough to melt and fail.
I guess you have no idea about structural engineering. Actually, I don't have to guess because it is stunningly obvious you have no idea what you are saying.
You are amazingly gullible.
Oh yea... and how many engineering classes do you have under your belt
Maybe you should provide evidence instead of making assumptions to insult my character.. or maybe just make some up
-------------------------
The fact is though the designer and builders said that the tower should've withstood the impact. /quote]
Where did you get this idiot claim from? What hoax site did this come from?
---------------------------
From one the documentaries I watched
How do you explain the fall of building 7?
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by mb2591
Except that every single shred of scientific evidence regarding death points to it being the end of life, not the start of anything else. But hey, if you want to embrace oblivion be my guest.
