It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Muslim Extremists Claim They Have Nuclear Weapon!

page: 1
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 04:45 PM
link   

There are several reports coming from multiple Muslim nations in the Middle East that a group of Muslim Extremists have acquired a nuclear weapon. The weapon is said to have been bought on the black market and could be one of Russia’s missing missiles.


Read more: socyberty.com...







~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
AboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count. Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread. If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events, or important information from other sites; please post one or two paragraphs, a link to the entire story, AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item as a means to inspire discussion or collaborative research on your subject.
edit on 1/25/2011 by 12m8keall2c because: added required external source tags & mod note about thread starts




posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 04:54 PM
link   
reply to post by chimaybliss
 

Rut-ro. A potential set up for a False Flag?
Blame it on Iranian state supported Terror?
Nah,,,I must spend too much time on ATS.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 04:56 PM
link   
I have no doubts that on the black market, such a purchase is possible, but how valid is the source and in reality, is such a purchased item even in any state to actually work?

From what I understand a lot of work has to go into keeping nuclear devices capable of detonating, they require a lot of maintenance that without that knowledge or experience could cause the device to be a dud.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 04:56 PM
link   
Although this is always a possibility nowadays the blog you have taken this information from has no sources listed and even states this is most likely propoganda.
The question is whos propoganda?

Most likely more fear mongering tosh designed to 'help' people see the 'truth'(TM)



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:06 PM
link   
what would they even do with it if they had one, where could they launch it from unless some clown is going to blow himself up with it and how extreme are the people who supposedly have control of it.
this is a worry if true but you would have to be a complete moron to sell a nuke to one of bin ladens cronies



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:18 PM
link   
what are the possible targets? Los Angeles,Washington DC, New York etc? And how will they be smuggled into America?



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by starwarsisreal
what are the possible targets? Los Angeles,Washington DC, New York etc? And how will they be smuggled into America?
You are kidding, right? They just walk the damn thing across the border from mexico.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:24 PM
link   
reply to post by sonofliberty1776
 


Take it to Yellowstone Natural Park and detonate it there... then bye-bye America. That would be the best use of a single nuke to destroy America imo... but Terrorists are not Geologists and probably have no idea what a Super-volcano is and what Yellowstone is capable of.

Chances are they would just blow up a city block and be all allah ackbar about it.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by sonofliberty1776
 


The OP says it could be a missing missile from Russia; I doubt anyone could walk a missile across the border.

I doubt the story. Where would you hide a missile?



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:28 PM
link   
reply to post by YouAreDreaming
 


Hey , Im in that hotzone.

Cut me some slack.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:30 PM
link   
reply to post by lnr42
 


SInce the site offers no sources or even an author name, I would say the site itself is doing the propagandizing.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:31 PM
link   
Man, you guys are thinking small....

If they have acquired a nuclear device, they are going to try to launch it into orbit. It only needs to get 65 miles up and detonate in the right direction and we'll be saying hello to the late 1800's. It would absolutely decimate this country, or any other country impacted.

I've been saying for years... Kim Jong Mentally Ill and Achmadina-Nutjob have been focused on MISSILE delivery, and if you haven't noticed, they don't care about ICBM missiles. Iran tested putting monkeys in space.... for WHAT? Because they want to be in a space race? PLEASE.... it's so they can measure the weight of a small warhead to be put into a sustained orbit.

Put your Dr. Evil hat on for a minute...

If you had the option of taking out a small city with a nuke, or watching a country tear itself a part from nuking their communications infrastructure or electrical grid, which would you choose? Which would be the bigger bargaining chip? Ahhhh.... now you're thinking....

If this is true, it will be bad news.

S&F OP.


~Namaste
edit on 24-1-2011 by SonOfTheLawOfOne because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by YouAreDreaming
 


Turn Yellowstone into sulfiurstone or brimstone....another potential target would be the san andreas fault line or the new madrid fault (see fema NLE 2011) or lower manhattan, ny. I dont think that they are ready to nuke DC yet. Doesnt Geo Soros have an office kitty corner to the WH? (Probably in the "Riggs" Natl Bank...a propos for one of the world';s biggest market "riggers".)
BTW, did they ever find that nuke that turned up missing from that flight out of the Minot, SD air base?



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Common Good
 


I'm not too far from that place and would not be happy if it pops (naturally or with a little push from man).

Yellowstone is the American destroyer... forget the terrorists... nature has us all by the gonads!



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   
reply to post by CosmicCitizen
 


I agree with san andreas but since it was the plot of the Superman Movie I opted out of it. Yellowstone is the new face of natural disaster!

Especially since it breathed 10 inches last week... interesting times.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   
By the way folks...

On the nuclear against Yellowstone idea...

1) It better be a massive nuke
2) It must be absolutely strategically placed, and even then there is no guarantee
3) The depth to create the explosion needed would probably incinerate the nuke from the heat
4) I highly doubt they could pull something like that off.

~Namaste



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:38 PM
link   
reply to post by YouAreDreaming
 


IF Jellystone blows that would be bad for Yogi and Boo-Boo....and half of the continental US (which just so happens to include the bread basket).



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:39 PM
link   
Calm down folks, they don't have one.

Look, terrorists don't brag about having a nuke. They use it.

Since they are just blabbing and not actually using it, they don't have it.

Basic terrorist psychology.

We also have terminology for this type of scenario.

Pinnacle-Empty Quiver
AKA
Rogue Spear



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:40 PM
link   
Where there's a will, there's a way.



posted on Jan, 24 2011 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by chimaybliss
 


Please show us these "Several Other reports", Why nothing on the mainstream News?...Im quite sure Obama would want us to know this considering its proof there is a reason for war


A smell fishy news...



new topics

top topics



 
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join