It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(NaturalNews) Watch out for the word "unscientific" in propaganda that's pushing GMOs, pesticides or other dangerous chemicals onto our world. In a joint letter to USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack, three Republican members of Congress (Rep. Frank Lucas, Sen. Saxby Chambliss, Sen. Pat Roberts) attempted to spin GMOs as being "scientific."
They urged the USDA to "return to a science based regulatory system" and claimed that "science strongly supports the safety of GE alfalfa."
The implication, of course, is that anyone who opposes GMOs is "unscientific" (and therefore stupid). The letter further implies that any USDA opposition to GMOs is purely political in nature and not based on science.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
It's not "secret code" at all. Calling a stance unscientific means it either has no well-accepted scientific footing, or contradicts currently accepted science. That's not to say it CAN'T be supported by science, it just currently isn't.
For example: most things posted on natural news are unscientific (and poorly written, but that's another issue altogether). That sire tends to take a few snippets of a study, pull them out of context, and then make unscientific assertions without any evidence.
Originally posted by kalamatas
Once again, where's the "science" on the effectiveness for the flu vaccine? Rather where's the proof?
But let's trust in the "science" of the safety gmo's right
The last one. Hello? The problem here is the fact that they're using TAXPAYER dollars!
They can't use the word proof, because there is none.
Originally posted by kalamatas
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
I won't continue the vaccine debate on this thread, but I can tell you the holes I see in those studies, or at least incompleteness of data to truly validate their conclusions. And if you'd like we can go back to one of the vaccine threads and we can debate on that
There's a crap load of data on the dangers of gmo's not anecdotes. Frankly I'm tired, so would be happy to post links later, but if you're anxious just search "studies showing dangers of gmo's"