CHILLING - New Air Force commercial - what does it mean?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 32 times


reply posted on 24-1-2011 @ 09:55 AM by prexparte
reply to post by Helious



I noticed no one is wearing nuclear safe suits, masks. SO personally I see this commercial as a catastrophic situation being handled by the airforce..This is quite interesting...Great find thanks for posting.


reply posted on 24-1-2011 @ 09:56 AM by Helious
reply to post by vincentBlue24



This was my thought exactly, with all the possible scenarios they could have depicted in this commercial they choose to show a modern city completely and totally destroyed by a cataclysmic event straight out of Hollywood.
I wouldn't be bothered so much if this wasn't put together and aired on National TV by the U.S. Government.

I'm not saying it isn't possible that I may be reading too much into it but to me it would seem just another subliminal message thrown out there for some sort of desensitization of the general public. In my opinion, most people who would be considered the masses would not give this ad a second thought, it would just sit in there sub conscious.


reply posted on 24-1-2011 @ 10:04 AM by Helious
reply to post by DrumsRfun



Yeah, I definitely see where your coming from. It would stand to reason that the more you dramatize and romanticize a job, the more people you could interest in doing it, sure.

Problem is, after the movie 2012 we had official statements from the highest level of government how irresponsible the film was in inciting possibly more panic concerning 12-21-2012, how is the depiction of the scene in the commercial less irresponsible? Moreover, why would it be used?

Dramatizing is one thing, showing apocalyptic type scenery involving a major modern city which involves complete destruction is suspect at best when it comes from Uncle Sam.



reply posted on 24-1-2011 @ 10:10 AM by DrumsRfun
reply to post by Helious



The government is the name.
Propaganda is their game.
They usually don't play by the rules they set for others.


reply posted on 24-1-2011 @ 10:20 AM by subversivemike
...And this link is from '09.

www.denverpost.com...

An Associated Press investigation found that over the past five years, the money the military spends on winning hearts and minds at home and abroad has grown by 63 percent, to at least $4.7 billion this year, according to Department of Defense budgets and other documents. That's almost as much as it spent on body armor for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2004 to 2006.


This year, the Pentagon will employ 27,000 people just for recruitment, advertising and public relations — almost as many as the total 30,000-person workforce in the State Department.


The biggest chunk of funds — about $1.6 billion — goes into recruitment and advertising. Another $547 million goes into public affairs, which reaches American audiences. And about $489 million more goes into what is known as psychological operations, which targets foreign audiences.


Well, you get the point.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



May 20/21, 2012: the true meaning.
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
Cool Eclipse pictures (Earth, Moon, Sun, Pleiades)
  Posted 8 days ago with 24 member flags
Why the 2012 Phenomenon is Real!
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags
World Message: Beginning May 26 thru Dec 21
  Posted 10 days ago with 14 member flags
newly discovered mayan calendars go beyond 2012
  Posted 18 days ago with 12 member flags
OMG: 2012 KP24 Incoming! Are we Doomed?
  Posted 3 days ago with 10 member flags
Nebula or Nibiru (May 28 2012)
  Posted 1 days ago with 10 member flags
Secret rogue planet may be hiding behind Neptune
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags