It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Why Comparing Republicans to Nazis is Credible

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Feb, 3 2011 @ 06:10 PM
After reading what the op wrote down, and the comments that were written down, there are a lot of things that can and should be stated:
The op has compared the Republican and the Tea Party to the Nazi party, stating that some people are similar to Adolf Hitler and the party that was written. Looking back at history, World War II and in particular the rise of the Nazi party, was one that most historians would agree, was caused by the end of World War I, and the treaty that ended it. As the treaty bankrupted the entire country of Germany and its allies, as well as forced change on the different populations, it was natural that the people of Germany looked for someone who stated he could solve their problems and who knew the real reason for the countries failure and lose of the war. The conditions were ripe for a dictator to take control, and as the Nazi party needed a scapegoat, along with the feelings of animosity towards those who were Jewish, it was the perfect storm and situation to be able to lead a campaign of terror and try to kill off those who they hated, and wanted to be hated.
The OP has stated that there is similarities between the Republicans, the individuals and the tea party, as claiming that they are using the same underling prejudices, yet fails to show any real facts in the matter. The question should be asked, what is so wrong about wanting a financially responsible government and a reduction in the national debt, along with holding the government responsible for its actions and spending? How is that prejudicial or having the same ideology as the Nazi party? If anything, socialist and unions are more in line with the Nazi’s, along with the Democratic party, and facts will be provided for such. The op stated that such does not like minorities, yet fails to remember that in a historical sense, it was the political party, that was the forefather of the Democratic party, that was for slavery, along with segregation, and it was the Republicans and the party before them, that was against such. And if the reference is towards the Hispanic communities, then is trying to curtail the illegal immigrants, a majority of whom according to the federal government, just happens to be of Hispanic origin, coming from both South and Latin America, through Mexico, and that the people are demanding that this activity be halted to? We are a land of laws and equal justice, so there has to be laws that should be enforced, rather than just ignored. It is coming out now, that many of the sanctuary cities are going bankrupt, and it will be the rest of a state or the entire country that has to bail them out. And if, as the OP would suggest that there is that rampant racism in American, then how did Barak Obama get elected in the United States?
The claim of the middle and upper class being greedy and not caring for people could be argued, that when ever there is a disaster that affects a portion of the country, or another country, it is the middle and upper class that is more than willing to open their wallets and donate to those places in need. It is immoral and wrong to force a person to be charitable, or any group for that matter to give, if they choose not to. The op mentioned Iraq, yet it has been within the power of congress to end all of the conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan at any time, as the Democrats have been in power for the past 8 years, had the majority and could have at any time, cut the funding for the military, thus making the president call the military forces back at any time. The question should be asked, why did they not do such, and why is it that when ever there is a round of military base closings suggested, the Democratic congressmen, fight hard to not have the military bases in their states or even districts closed? The OP mentioned the patriot act, yet fails to also mention the same democratic majority also renewed that act, instead of repealing it.
Ever since the current sitting president has taken office, anyone who has dared to disagree with his policies has been slandered and threatened, including the use of force by his backers, as was seen during the town hall meetings up to the passing of the Health care bill. It was witnessed where Unions and the supporters of the democrats, to include Acorn and SEIU, were willing to break the law in favor of getting their way or to silence any debate. And the Rep from Tennessee, did not apparently feel the need or listen to the call for civility in the rhetoric, where the Republicans and all of the fore mentioned people have and has toned it down. If anything, it only shows who is more in line with the Nazi Party, lets take a look: Slander anyone who disagrees with the party line, control of business, forcing people to give up their hard earned money, physically attacking those who disagree and outright lying to the general population, along with not wanting to include those who disagree with them in any sort of debate.

posted on Feb, 3 2011 @ 07:18 PM
I think any time you have a political party that creates a base of fear and hatred, uses homeland attacks to take away civil liberties, justify the use of torture, invade countries based on false intel, use strong pro-war propaganda, suggest that political dissenters and anti-war protestors are anti-homeland, while figuring out a way to create an enemy out of an entire religion, indiscriminately killing over a hundred thousand men, women, and children of said religion... you run the risk of being called a nazi.
edit on 3-2-2011 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 3 2011 @ 07:30 PM
Intresting, gangs is all i see that follow a certain corporate structure. No different. explain to me the difference please. bloods and cripts fight over turf which in turn relates to a certain percentage of people. politicians fight for territory in the same regard. Metaphorically speaking. Im just saying that politics is just a big circle jerk really. LETS GET NOTHING ACCOMPLISHED AND ARGUE WITH EACH OTHER ABOUT WHO IS RIGHT AND WHO IS WRONG. The people are still waiting for them to fix # in the mean time.

posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 06:49 AM
Nazi's build the best roads/highway system this Earth has ever seen.

Nazi's built a cheap automobile their poor citizens could afford.

Nazi's heavily funded Science and Research.

Nazi's secured their country.

Republican's ain't no Nazi's. Your severe hatred for a group that has no goals, purpose, or general care for their own citizens seems misdirected. The Republicans aren't even worthy of claiming half of the Nazi's successful accomplishments.

And neither are our Democrats.

posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 07:12 AM
reply to post by inforeal

Check it out they all tie in anyways

brief reading that supports, no proves this topic

posted on Feb, 9 2011 @ 07:54 PM
Intresting find

new topics

top topics
<< 1  2   >>

log in