posted on Jan, 23 2011 @ 02:17 PM
I am a little unsure with the info provided if the charges were dropped or if they were never filed in the first place. Technically I guess that makes
no difference but it does help tell the story. I can only assume the were STOPPING HER for SUSPECTED drunk driving but that it was not shown to be
true upon checking.
I can only conclude by most of the comments that the American people like a little "street justice" and typically agree one should be presumed guilty
even in the absence of charges being filed. Perhaps a little "roughing-up" of old ladies and innocent bystanders (such as the Seattle man slammed
headfirst against the wall) just helps keep the American sheeple in line.
Wasn't it Reagan's Attorney General that stated, "If they weren't guilty they wouldn't be indicted"? Statements such as that demonstrate the direction
American justice has taken.
I suppose the next step is for the police to periodically roundup a few Americans at random and beat the crap out of them just to demonstrate the
compliance expected of its people. Anyone not going along with this program or openly objecting to it should therefore be tazed and arrested for
resisting and citing a riot.
edit on 23-1-2011 by Erongaricuaro because: (no reason given)