Mind telling me what the coincidental correlation is between this supposed "glyph/henge" site and the China Lake Naval Test Facility? I'm at a loss
here.
As is widely known most of these Mars structures you keep indicating to are geological formations, and has been factually accounted for by NASA
themselves.
As for
Being a "UFO SPACE PORT MARKER"
You're kidding right?
I just realized that it was your personal site too.. Don't you get tired of presenting hypothetical scenarios based on faceless, poorly percieved and
factually INaccurate information? I know I would.
The thing I love most is that you're looking for comparisons to classical ancient architecture found here on earth created by some alien civilization.
Wouldn't one suggest that for an advanced and far more ancient species they would build something a little more factually comprehensive? Something
with good structure, good architecture, good materials?
Either you're insulting the crap out of "them", or you're wrong.. by mistaking geological features and straining the eye so hard that you begin to see
what you want to see i'm going for the latter.
Which one is it?
edit on 24-1-2011 by plexus because: additional information added
EDIT: Thought I was finished, TREES ON MARS... COME ON MAN... don't you feel at least a bit stupid?
Umm.. Just an extra perspective on your "glyphs and possible henge"
I'll give you that the glyphs look fine, as long as carbon dating is able to date the patina left in the grooves of chiseling/etching.. a henge? Come
on, we have examples of henges that pre date stonehenge by a thousand or two years. But you give us this piss poor example of water eroded geology?
Give us this "monumental architecture" but then no native peoples with in the area to give credit to the theory?
Considering all you offer is a crap screenshot of Google Earth, i'm not even going to comment.
P.S. Blue links on a black background really makes it hard to read anything you're trying to convey on that site.
P.P.S. TREEES ON MARRRRSSSSS *smashes head into desk*
edit on 24-1-2011 by plexus because: additional information added