reply to post by condition9
People with experience and some beyond-juvenile idea of how the world works can smell plausible truth and distinguish it from BS.
For instance, typical distinguishing characteristics between Real Things from Movie and Video Game Fantasies:
(a) in the real world, logistics, budgets and bureaucracy rule and shape the projects, not rogue geniuses/Rambo soldiers.
(b) The real world is compatible with the laws of physics
(c) The real world is compatible with open history and politics
(d) People in the real world have jobs and family responsibilities
(e) less disclosed projects often interlink with more disclosed projects in reasonable ways
(f) Reality is way more boring than a science fiction movie
(g) Engineering progress happens over years, not hours
(h) Follow The Money.
Truth1000 smells like the 1% of reality in the 99% of BS you read.
Look at the infrastructure requirements for places like Oak Ridge, Hanford, Rocky Flats, and its immense in every facet. Even the electrical
requirements are incredible for processing nuclear material. Do you think you could just hide something like Hanford or Oak Ridge underground with
zero evidence of it, no evidence of housing, or the thousands of people that would be working there? Who would need places to live, jobs, recreation,
etc..
If I understand Truth1000 correctly, this facility is not used for refining or enriching Special Nuclear Materials, which as you say require very
large and expensive infrastructure & power, like Oak Ridge K-25, Paducah, Hanford, Savannah River etc.
Truth1000 intimates that it deals with the engineering, e.g. machining and assembly, of components which have a significant danger of causing a
criticality accident. These facilities would be much, much smaller than enrichment. For instance, the Oak Ridge Y-12 plant---a small portion of that
plant provided the machining and fabrication of thermonuclear secondaries for most US nuclear weaponry. It's just a building or two, and is small.
That's the sort of facility that you could conceivably want in an underground location if what they are doing is even more risky.
The raw materials would be produced elsewhere.
edit on 15-3-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-3-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-3-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason
given)
edit on 15-3-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)