Countdown With Keith Olbermann Cancelled, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times
Topic started on 21-1-2011 @ 08:10 PM by tothetenthpower
Hey ATS,

Just finished watching Keither Olbermann's show and it was announced at the end that tonight was his last show. Apparently they have ended the contract.

I have no official link yet.

What do you all think?

Here's a video.

www.msnbc.msn.com...

News story up on CNN:

Keith Olbermann is leaving MSNBC, the "Countdown" host announced on his show Friday night.

The liberal commentator told viewers he had been informed "this was going to be the last edition" of his show, but offered no further details.

NBC/Universal confirmed the news in a statement Friday night.

"MSNBC and Keith Olbermann have ended their contract. The last broadcast of "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" will be this evening. MSNBC thanks Keith for his integral role in MSNBC's success and we wish him well in his future endeavors.


Link

~Keeper
edit on 1/21/2011 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)


edit on 1/21/2011 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 21-1-2011 @ 08:17 PM by tothetenthpower
reply to post by Misoir




I wonder who they have slated to take his place? I'm sure his career isn't finished.

!Keeper



reply posted on 21-1-2011 @ 09:02 PM by Hefficide
reply to post by tothetenthpower



There were a few "Special Comments" from Olbermann that, while obviously divisive in intent, really struck a chord with me in general. I remember the era when the Patriot Act was being passed, when Olbermann was the ONLY journalist I could find who wasn't candy coating the severity of it.

And few remember that, while we, in the fringe, love to suggest that agents might nor might not have tried to sway a newscaster... Olbermann actually did have a scrape with Feds trying to intimidate him. Something that his right wing, current contemporaries, don't seem to be suffering.

Of course, ultimate, Olbermann is out because Obama is in office and the "disgruntled masses" of today are more inline with Hannity and Beck.

But, give it a few years, give or take... And it'll be Hannity losing his job, and Olbermann, or someone very much like him, stealing the show. The opposition party always gets the pundit niche.

~Heff


reply posted on 21-1-2011 @ 09:30 PM by kinda kurious
I suspect the fact that the FCC recently graced final approval of takeover by COMCAST might have played a factor.

Comcast Wins U.S. Approval to Buy NBC Universal From GE for $13.8 Billion



Source

Unless you just want to use this as an opportunity to bash Olbemann. If you understand ANYTHING about media plurality and net neutrality, you might not be jumping for joy. I expect to see choices shrink and fees rise.

By combining the largest TV network with one of the largest cable distributors, the FCC is allowing a concentration of power that some might argue is healthy for the efficiency of the business, but more worry will stifle competition, plurality and even increase the threat to net neutrality.


www.guardian.co.uk...

Political Background Info regarding COMCAST from 2009:

Comcast – the country’s largest provider of cable TV and broadband Internet services – has increased its political giving along with its mergers and acquisitions. CEO Brian Roberts was a co-chairman of the host committee at the 2000 Republican Convention. Comcast Cable President Stephen Burke has raised at least $200,000 for Bush’s re-election campaign.


The company was a “platinum sponsor” at the 2000 GOP convention, and Roberts was a co-chairman of the host committee at the Philadelphia event. Burke was appointed to the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology in 2002.


Why would Comcast be interested in silencing progressive voices? Historically, Comcast has boosted its profits by buying up various telecommunication and media content companies — instead of providing faster Internet or better services (overall, American broadband services are far slower than in many industrialized nations). Many of these mergers, as Public Citizen and Free Press have reported, have been allowed by regulators because of Comcast’s considerable political muscle. Comcast’s latest regulatory battle has been to oppose Net Neutrality — a rule allowing a free and open Internet — because the company would prefer to have customers pay for preferred online content.

Olbermann has been a strong voice in favor of a free and open Internet. Republicans, on the other hand, have supported the telecommunication industry’s push to radically change the Internet so corporate content producers have the upper hand over start-ups like blogs, independent media, small businesses, etc.


Source

So high five all you'd like while they slowly stifle our freedoms.



edit on 21-1-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)
edit on 21-1-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 21-1-2011 @ 09:59 PM by kinda kurious
reply to post by ModernAcademia



Do yourself a favor and read my post. All will be explained and you won't even have to think very hard.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags