100% proof 9/11 was a controlled demolition

page: 1
0

log in

join

posted on Mar, 19 2003 @ 05:05 PM
link   
The Muslims suspend laws of Physics part 1
www.serendipity.li...

The Muslims suspend laws of Physics part 2
www.serendipity.li...

Unexplained explosion of Building 6

www.americanfreepress.net... 1_.html


Photo's clips and explanation of WTC Implosions

home.attbi.com...

Eyewitness's report bombs in WTC

www.rense.com...

Fireman a bomb went off

people.aol.com...

double explosion NBC

www.wnbc.com...

More eyewitness's describe multiple explosions
www.thememoryhole.org...

Wrong tower collapsed first

www.serendipity.li...

Building 7 implosion

www.whatreallyhappened.com...

FEMA report of Building 7 collapse a Joke

www.indymedia.no...

Building 7 was a head CIA HQ
www.cyberspaceorbit.com...

History of Building 7

www.whatreallyhappened.com...



FEMA and Independent engineers report Molten Steel at the bottom of the WTC, which the Independent engineers say was caused by Amonium Nitrate which is used to put at the bottom of buildings so the demolition waves can run through the buildings easier, the molten steel was found on WTC 1 2 and 7. A Bright Amonium Nitrate type Mushroom cloud was seen rising from Building 1 2 and 7. And Seismic graph that shows a 2.1 and 2.3 Earthquake before both collapses

www.serendipity.li...

Fires burned for 12 weeks

www.newscientist.com...


science.howstuffworks.com...

Read that, on that, there is a video clip of a tower falling in the exact same fassion the 47 story high, twice as wide just as fat as the WTC building 7. It also says to make a building fall in a footprint is so sophisticated only a handful of company's around the world dare to do... Yet they claim building 7 collapsed because of fires, when nothing hit it and in the exact same fassion as a controlled demolition...

The rubble starts to shrink

www.serendipity.li...




posted on Mar, 20 2003 @ 03:43 PM
link   
Hmmm...You post one thread that shows "100% Proof of Implosion" & you also post another thread that shows "100% Proof of Controlled Demolition"...

How can either way be "100%"?

I don't think you really know *what* it is you're trying to prove...



posted on Mar, 21 2003 @ 11:10 AM
link   
Old stuff, frequently debunked. We debunked it here, in fact -- folks living near Ground Zero (William) and others had unkind things to say about the disinformation about the bombs.

At one time we had links to the complete captures of all 911 transmissions on that day and no, there wasn't anything about bombs or extra explosions. Believe me, if that fireman's report had been real, the 911 channels would have been FULL of that chatter!



posted on Mar, 21 2003 @ 01:49 PM
link   
OK THEN FUKKING DENOUNCE IT ALREADY



new topics
 
0

log in

join