It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Golf66
no one wants to repeal the Constitution; just an Amendment to it...
Originally posted by macman
It is nice to talk about original intent and so on for Citizenship, but it does not take away from the fact that tax dollars are going to the children of illegals.
As US Citizens they warrant the same social insurance that every otehr American citizen qualifies for.
Originally posted by Flatfish
reply to post by Kangaruex4Ewe
Don't want to burst your bubble but if you really want to get upset about misuse of your tax dollars, why don't you check out the rising cost of "Corporate Welfare" in your county. Just beware of the fact that it disguises itself in many forms ranging from tax subsidies and abatements to free access to public lands and resources as well as public funding of R&D.
Personally, I'd rather spend my tax dollars helping people who need help as opposed to subsidizing corporations which are making record profits year after year while outsourcing every possible aspect of their business, destroying the american standard of living in the process.
Originally posted by mtnshredder
reply to post by maybereal11
As US Citizens they warrant the same social insurance that every otehr American citizen qualifies for.
Yes they do and when they're old enough (18) that they do not legally have a parent or guardian, they're welcome to come back.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by macman
It is nice to talk about original intent and so on for Citizenship, but it does not take away from the fact that tax dollars are going to the children of illegals.
"the children of Illegal Immigrants" is just as factual as "US Citizens"...and seeing as it is not illegal to be a child of an illegal immigrant I would say that the fact that they are "US Citizens" is the most relevant factor....and the Gov. agrees when they provide security for these citizens the way they do every other citizen.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by macman
It is nice to talk about original intent and so on for Citizenship, but it does not take away from the fact that tax dollars are going to the children of illegals.
"the children of Illegal Immigrants" is just as factual as "US Citizens"...and seeing as it is not illegal to be a child of an illegal immigrant I would say that the fact that they are "US Citizens" is the most relevant factor....and the Gov. agrees when they provide security for these citizens the way they do every other citizen.
Great. Send the illegal parents packing and give them a choice, take the kid back or become a ward of the state.
Easy enough.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by mtnshredder
reply to post by maybereal11
As US Citizens they warrant the same social insurance that every otehr American citizen qualifies for.
Yes they do and when they're old enough (18) that they do not legally have a parent or guardian, they're welcome to come back.
Having a legal parent or guardian is not a neccessity of citizenship, nor is age as any orphan will tell you.
Originally posted by maybereal11
reply to post by macman
I hope that is just a rhetorical quip by someone not entirely comfortable engaging thier empathetic imagination...
Can you imagine the place they left? The risks they took and take simply to be in America?
I do not wish the loss of a child on anyone and certainly not as a penalty for comming here and doing the jobs that no one else wants to do...and doing them for pay no one else would work for....and to them that is "the good life".
They are the least of our brothers and we ask them to come here and work insane jobs for insanely low pay and then look down our noses and call them criminals.
One day we will run out of people to blame for our problems.
Originally posted by Honor93
everyone has a CHOICE ... that is what makes the situation so bad. Those who've already broken our laws, choose to continue doing so.
So, if i rape your child and get away with it, does that give me the right to continue raping whomever crosses my path because i choose such ?
should i be given equal freedom as the next citizen or punished for my actions?
sorry, but your 'excuse' just doesn't fly with me.
Originally posted by Honor93
why do you equate 'something better' with breaking our laws and cheating the system?
(not your parents specifically but everyone who is present today, illegally)
how would you feel if i imposed my 'illegal methods' on your family and finances?
Originally posted by Honor93
wrong ... illegal entry has always been a problem. Just not so widespread, not so 'public' (thanks to the internet) and often (back then) many were 'sponsored' ... which is another path of legal entry and one reason so many illegal 'seniors/elders' are getting their citizenship these days --> so they can 'sponsor' the remainder of their foreign family, legally.
Originally posted by Honor93
and, just when did i 'generalize' regarding any issue other than "they are illegal" ... which applies to ALL, regardless of their desire to 'better' their lives. And on that point, IF they really wanted to better their lives, why delay acquiring citizenship? unless it was never their intention from the beginning.
Originally posted by Honor93
what makes you think i didn't? were you there to see those who did get hired? (hint: i was) guess how many didn't even speak English? (6 out of 8) guess how many weren't even 21yrs old? (4 out of 8) guess how many arrived with -0- documentation but got a job, anyway? (3) and lastly, guess how many of those Goodwill is paying for 'schooling' to do the work they were hired to perform? (2 - driver training / after getting a license)
Now, i am not bitter about the situation ... but i am not blind, either.
but here's the kicker ... Goodwill gets tax incentives to hire them, rather me or anyone in a similar position.
i totally agree the employer situation needs attention but stopping the flow of available 'incentives' is a good place to start, imho.
Originally posted by WhizPhiz
reply to post by Kangaruex4Ewe
But he argues that the money is collected by the illegal immigrant parents, putting a painful burden on taxpayers, including those who are legal immigrants.
Who really gives a sh!t! Children are children, regardless of where they come from...they need support.
But hey, who could care less about those illegal immigrant children...nothing but a "burden", money is what matters.
Originally posted by CaptChaos
You are all oblivious of the reality:
In the past, immigration was capped at 165,000 immigrants per year. THIS is how the nation was formed. NEVER were more than that number allowed in. All your tales of how badly the Irish and the Italians etc were treated are meaningless.
The peak year of European immigration was in 1907, when 1,285,349 persons entered the country.[19] By 1910, 13.5 million immigrants were living in the United States.[20]
The American, Emergency Quota Act, also known as the Emergency Immigration Act of 1921 and the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921 (ch. 8, 42 Stat. 5, or the Johnson Quota Act) of May 19, 1921, restricted immigration into its country; the act imposed a quota that limited the number of immigrants who would be admitted from any country annually to 3%[1] of the number of residents from that same country who lived in the United States, based on the United States Census figures from 1910. Taking native-born residents into account, this calculation indicated a total of 357,802 new immigrants would be allowed annually.
In 1921, the incoming immigrant population was settled down to 198,082 from Northern and Western Europe, and 158,367 from principally Southern and Eastern Europe (including other countries), being shown as a drastic reduction in immigration levels from other countries, principally Southern and Eastern Europe. This also portrays a 3% level in reduction. This was due to the Emergency Quota Act of 1921.