Time and time again in discussion concerning suspicious long lasting, cloud forming aircraft trails in the sky commonly referred to as chemtrails, it
is the sceptics and attempted debunkers that display the most ignorance. They are most ignorant to the fact that people all over the world have
suddenly began to notice and talk about those unusual streaks appearing in the sky that linger around much longer and behave in ways they had not
previously been accustomed to witnessing.
The sceptics typically, by their own authority claim to be the proof that chemtrails do not exist.
So, where is the proof that aircraft are not
spraying the skies?
For a start, it is not the role of a sceptic to prove anything, ever. The burden of proof lies with the one making the assertion. It is up to those
who claim the trails are not normal contrails that must provide the proof and provide evidence to support those claims. A sceptic’s role is to
demand proof, not to demand an alternative believe or worse, to shoot a person down for questioning in the first place.
There are many steps taken along the road to providing proof. They begin with observation, theorising, testing, record keeping, making comparisons and
finally the creation of hypothesis to be tested and supported. Of course it is possible that along this road mistakes can be made, so called evidence
gathered may be tainted or its origin incorrectly assumed. Proof is not maintained unless it is sound and undeniable during all attempts to recreate
the conditions that made it so in the first place.
Young people who don’t have a history of sky watching, or who may not have a long enough memory record and lack comparison may be excused for
trusting that the trails being talked about are normal.
Anyone with more than twenty years of sky observations is simply holding their head in the sand if they too still hold their trust in things being
normal. Regardless of what authority they claim to have, an airline pilot of X number of years, aircraft maintenance, weather bureau, ex military or
other government worker etc, to ignore a fact noticed my millions around the world, that something has changed, is as ignorant as one can get.
Regardless of their cause, chemical spraying, changes in fuel, different temperatures of modern jet engines, changes in the Earths atmosphere, the
sceptics are failing to acknowledge that in recent times something indeed has changed about trails left behind aircraft.
Most people will remember contrails as the long white trail left behind aircraft on some days and how they quickly faded away. Many people can also
, where an aircraft expels special smoke, often by burning oil, to spell out a
slogan of some sort in the sky, which may stay visible for some minutes at a time before either being torn apart by the winds or dispersal of the
The change in some aircraft trails that has been observed and talked about regarding the so called chemtrails is how long they tend to stay in the sky
and how they will also spread out in a fashion causing an appearance of overcast clouds. People have commented that a beautiful blue sky can be ruined
by these trails that form clouds that spread out and fill they sky lasting for hours.
They are the observations, not by one or a few, but by millions of people world wide.
When people notice a change in something, curiosity can lead to many creative reasons for the change. It is typical practice to first examine what is
known about the thing in question in the first place. In the case of long lasting, cloud forming aircraft trails, it is necessary to examine the
phenomena of contrails. When what is known about contrails does not conform to what is observed with the long lasting, cloud forming trails, the next
step is to theorise on what the difference could be due to.
Here is where the fun begins and the sceptics are able to turn up the volume.
Theories based on Internet gathered pictures and documents, taken out of context open the door and invite people with some knowledge of the original
pictures and or documents, to shout down those attempting to come to reason with their observations. Once that door is open, the self appointed
authorities on contrails with their loud voices are able to point at the misguided attempts at explaining the trails in question and ignorantly claim
that every theory fits into the same category.
Regardless of what the origin may be, people have gathered and tested what they claim has fallen from the sky after so called chemtrails have appeared
in the sky overhead. Air quality samples have also been tested and documented and tend to support a recent change. Clearly, regardless how it got
there, something that was not previously falling from the sky is now falling from the sky. Or rather, what was once not in the air or in the air in
small amounts is now in the air or in the air in larger amounts. To deny this is to be ignorant of the testing taking place.
Have any of the noisy sceptics been testing air quality and comparing samples over a number of decades?
Sceptics have pointed to videos and photos from decades ago, particularly World War II archives that show many contrails filling the sky. They’ll
point out how it was a curse on the aircraft for it made them easier to spot from the air. None of these archive evidence shows the same sky an hour
later after the planes had left the scene. They are simply showing that contrails exist, which hardly anyone would question.
On the other hand, many videos and photos posted on the Internet by those who claim to have captured chemtrails have actually mistaken normal
contrails. These people demonstrating ignorance of contrails and making assumptions about their photos give the sceptics even more ammunition to shout
However, there are time lapse photos and videos showing trails that do not conform to expected contrail behaviour have been made from all over the
world and as more people have become aware of the difference there will be many more recordings in the future.
Unfortunately, in the case of aircraft leaving these suspicious trails being military, flight records and other data is off limits to civilians and
the military is not going to publicly announce what they are doing.
Only a fool may not recognise an apple is indeed nothing like an orange.
People see what they do see, this is not a mass hallucination, but instead many people are noticing that compared with the sky they remember and the
sky they witness today, it is a case of apples and oranges.
Even if people are simply annoyed by a “mess” in the sky and make no claims about the trails creation, people have noticed a difference,
especially, when they outlast a soft drink advertisement that has obviously been sprayed in the sky using smoke from burning oil. It is the hight of
ignorance to suggest that the comparisons made by observations do not exist.
It stands to reason that with observations of change to the type of aircraft trails occurring in the sky, theories examined and not discounted,
testing showing a change in air quality, photographic and video records of the new behaviour, and making comparisons with the past, a simple
hypothesis will arise.
“These new aircraft trails behave differently to how we have previously known contrails to behave and therefore are not created the same way
Now it is up to someone to prove how these long lasting trails are formed, not by speculation but with action that can be reproduced time again.
How can you prove an aircraft trail is not a contrail?
Probably not very easy at all and almost impossible from the ground:
* Fly up to a suspicious trail and gather samples while it is still in the sky.
* Follow an aircraft that has left one of the suspicious trails and examine it.
* If you pilot one, call the press and make an emergency landing in a public airport with your loaded aircraft.
* Use of some highly sophisticated scientific apparatus that can determine what the trails consist of.
An experiment that may assist to disprove chemtrails:
From ATS Thread: Chemtrails cloaking nibiru?
1) Observe type of aircraft and weather conditions that allow the creation of long lasting, cloud forming contrails.
2) Reproduce it.
3) Invite media and others interested to examine said aircraft before flight, using al sorts of chemical testing etc.
4) Take air quality samples regularly through the next 24 hour period.
5) Have one group of media go up in the said aircraft to verify the actual plane being witnessed by the other media group on the ground is the one
they have vetted.
Unfortunately a high level of ignorance exists on both sides of the discussion regarding long lasting aircraft trails that stay in the sky for hours
and turn into overcast clouds. Simply shouting at people for raising concerns will not solve any issues. Regardless of personal employment history, or
self claimed authority, unless one has produced and reproduced contrails that conform to the type of trails in question, the long lasting spreading
ones, and can provide the evidence, then one has no proof and is simply being a windmill, adding noise in these types of discussions.
“Although you flourish more arms that the giant Briareus, you shall pay for it!”
~ To the military, private and commercial airline industry.
Regardless of their cause, contrail or otherwise, a large and growing group of concerned people are not happy with the phenomena and have as little
regard for it as they would noise pollution. I consider myself within that group. We miss our blue skies and the military, private and commercial
airline industry must do something about preventing it.
If it is not spray, discover what speeds, altitudes, temperatures, or whatever combinations are responsible and modify your behaviour to prevent these
ugly trails from destroying our blue skies.
Many kind regards
edit on 20/1/2011 by Hammaraxx because: needed to fix BB code for link to ATS thread URL (overlooked in preview)