Failings of US Army Vehicles, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 20-1-2011 @ 03:11 PM by punkinworks10
reply to post by masonicon



You should really do your home work, the turbine engine in the ahbrams will run on a variety of fuels including JP-8( jet fuel), diesel, gasoline, and alcohol.
And your assertion about jet fuel, which is really just kerosene, being to flamablle is rediculous, it is makedly less flamable than either gasoline or alchohol.
On the modern battlefield, to use your armour for infantry cover will just get your tanks killed in a hurry, as well as the infantry trying to hide behind them.


reply posted on 20-1-2011 @ 04:50 PM by masonicon
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to
post by masonicon



You should really do your home work, the turbine engine in the ahbrams will run on a variety of fuels including JP-8( jet fuel), diesel, gasoline, and alcohol.
And your assertion about jet fuel, which is really just kerosene, being to flamablle is rediculous, it is makedly less flamable than either gasoline or alchohol.
On the modern battlefield, to use your armour for infantry cover will just get your tanks killed in a hurry, as well as the infantry trying to hide behind them.


Due to logistical reasons, Abrams only uses Jet Fuel


reply posted on 20-1-2011 @ 06:43 PM by tomcat ha
reply to post by punkinworks10



really now? because ive seen some footage in iraq where people still use other armoured vehicles like that.


reply posted on 20-1-2011 @ 08:09 PM by joejack
Originally posted by masonicon
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to
post by masonicon



You should really do your home work, the turbine engine in the ahbrams will run on a variety of fuels including JP-8( jet fuel), diesel, gasoline, and alcohol.
And your assertion about jet fuel, which is really just kerosene, being to flamablle is rediculous, it is makedly less flamable than either gasoline or alchohol.
On the modern battlefield, to use your armour for infantry cover will just get your tanks killed in a hurry, as well as the infantry trying to hide behind them.


Due to logistical reasons, Abrams only uses Jet Fuel



TheAbrams can run off of a variety of fuels as previously stated, and will mainly use diesel, when moving a colunm forward why have seperate fuel trucks your tanks? They designed the engine to run of multiple fuels for battlefield versatility. Diesel fuel is pretty closeto the composition of Jet fuel. Just look up the AGT-1500 thats the Abrams powerplant.


reply posted on 22-1-2011 @ 05:50 AM by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to
post by masonicon



You should really do your home work, the turbine engine in the ahbrams will run on a variety of fuels including JP-8( jet fuel), diesel, gasoline, and alcohol.
And your assertion about jet fuel, which is really just kerosene, being to flamablle is rediculous, it is makedly less flamable than either gasoline or alchohol.


Maybe you should do your homework.

The Russians loaded kerosene fuel into their T-90s during initial combat testing in Chechnya, just because it was too cold to use any other logistically availiable fuel. This made them especially vulnerable to rebel RPGs, since kerosene may not be as flamable as gasoline, but it is far more explosive.


reply posted on 26-1-2011 @ 12:19 AM by marinesniper0351
reply to post by randomname



I served in Iraq, I am a US Marine the Abrams covering our units were running on Diesel. It is was not uncommon during exercises to use them as cover for a short time, I was never burned. They are truly amazing, they excellerate hard were very accurate.

Now to the Russian's that want to knock the US Military...please read this article...brings new meaning to "battle of the bulge"... I have trained with Russian spec ops because I am a Sniper 0318 and they are good tough guys, like our Marine recon, not quite up to par with our Seals...but the average Russian trooper is a joke...

vets4politics.blogspot.com...


reply posted on 26-1-2011 @ 12:24 AM by marinesniper0351
reply to post by Reaper2137



I have not seen the laser but have seen the effects in the field of the microwave weapon that gets your molecules burning, truly amazing tech...these guys told me it was like a really bad sun tan then after they moved out of the rays range the pain went away. They were completely unable to function within the microwaves taget area...

Though they are mainly used with Humvs, they did test it ontop of a M1...


reply posted on 4-2-2011 @ 07:40 AM by Pervius
Originally posted by fatalwishes
Those big tired vehicles are not safe in heavy traffic when you have to slam on the brakes.


The MRAP is the armored osh kosh that's top heavy. From what I read of what happened in Iraq, if they are up to speed and have to swerve the dang thing will flip over.

The old Deuce and half's 6x6 and 5 ton version was more stable...just non armored.

Before the Iraq War remember the news stories where Army soldiers were saying they had nobody to fix their tanks to even get them to Iraq? Guess they contracted out vehicle maintenance.

DOD had to pour wheel barrows of money to get contractors in various places to keep things together. Early Iraq War photo's showed HMWWV's with bald tires tipped over along the roads. Poor-no maintenance before they even left.

Marine Corps/Navy was the first branch to contract out motor pool maintenance. Army followed then the Air Farce.

Took some mighty large wheel barrows of money to get the Army rolling where it is today. Getting rid of Army GI mechanics now seems to have been huge boondoggled in retrospect. Congress didn't save 1 penny opting for contracted maintenance...it actually lost BILLIONS. Completely lost control of Logistics/Support.

Thank God we have big wheel barrows and many printing presses.

That's the failing of US Army Vehicles. Why they gave up keeping non-computer multi-fuel powertrains as they were cheap and simple....and opted for highly complicated computer controlled powertrains-transmissions.....wow what a stupid thing to throw into the mix. But it did end up forcing the SECDEF to yank other branches funds and give them to the Army.

That aint never happened. risked our national security propping congress's failed contract it out program.

It's ok. Those Defense Contractors all funneled money back to Congress Critters pockets to get them to stop sweating. War and Thieving on all fronts is EASY money in da BANK.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Israeli Company Has FAA Permission to Fly Drones in U.S. Airspace
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
Colt Commander, finally failed
  Posted 6 days ago with 5 member flags
Laser Firearms
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
US Army Launches Phase II of competition to replace M4
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Show us your bow
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags