It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gandalphthegrey
Originally posted by Advantage
Originally posted by gandalphthegrey
Originally posted by thewesticle
So many paranormal investigation teams have lost my support by citing orbs as evidence. It's absolute nonsense and I'm glad to see so many like-minded folks on this thread.
We have a paranormal investigation program on British TV called "Most Haunted" . Most of their evidence for the case of there being paranormal activity in a given area was a couple of photographs of "Orbs" . It was infuriating to watch .
I love most haunted. David Acorah is a hoot.. we used to all pretend we were consulting Sam or if we screwed up, broke something, lost something, etc it was ALWAYS Sams fault.
And what did you think of his brother , Derek Acorah ?
Originally posted by gandalphthegrey
I have never seen a picture of a "orb" that was taken with a film camera and I defy anybody to show me one .
So come folks , lets lay this silly subject to rest , once and for all .
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by gandalphthegrey
I have never seen a picture of a "orb" that was taken with a film camera and I defy anybody to show me one .
So come folks , lets lay this silly subject to rest , once and for all .
I suppose it depends on what YOU decide is an 'orb'. Yes most 'orb' photos lately fit your 'debunk' No question of it. But true 'orbs' as in 'plasma critters' do exist. I would call THIS one such 'orb' that gives birth to a second one.
Perhaps you care to explain this one as a camera artifact
The full recording is actually 2o minutes long...
Originally posted by gandalphthegrey
looks nothing like the "orb" that we are dicussing ,
[Meanwhile , back in the real world
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by gandalphthegrey
looks nothing like the "orb" that we are dicussing ,
;lol: That YOU are 'dicussing'... but real people know the difference
[Meanwhile , back in the real world
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one" Albert Einstein.
Sadly your reality is in a very tiny little box. Enjoy your bliss
Originally posted by smurfy
Would an orb picture be more compelling if it was in transit round a subject, and without any noticeable motion on the part of the camera? Also, would a more pastel colour in pale pinks with a orb shape be a normal camera artifact?
Originally posted by toolstarr
Will you please provide resources to the declarations of what you find as unacceptable orbs and why?
What does it mean if it has circles inside, how does that automatically make it not real? What about faces inside?
And what about video of an orb moving across a room then up at a probably a 20 degree angle until it is out of frame or disappears?
Thank You.