It seems that many here have considered the possibility of a WW3. While it may be easy to dismiss such an event from happening altogether within the
next ten years, one must consider the political tensions and border disputes as of late. I will conduct a closer examination of WW3 in the
following.
Firstly, the conflicts! Quite possibly the most dangerous conflicts as of now are concentrated in the Middle East, the increasing threats by N. Korea
to invade S. Korea, and the China-Taiwan debate.
Now, before going any further, we must examine the sides involved. After careful study, I've found the following to be the most plausible:
USA (US foreign policy in recent years has unarguably brought many to think of the US as a "global police force," and thus they are likely to be
involved in all conflicts), EU (USA's closest ally), South Korea (obviously will be involved in the Korean conflict)
vs.
Many Middle Eastern countries (Afghanistan, Iran possibly, etc. I'm leaving out Palestine in this listing as I will elaborate on that soon!),
Russia/China (apparently Russia/China have a pact and close ties. According to treaties, Russia is to recognize China's sovereignty over Taiwan and
various other agreements. According to the pact, Russia will be invadnig Taiwan alongside China if Taiwan is to ever declare independance.), and N.
Korea (obviously involved in the Korean conflict)
Now, you may have clearly noticed I left out Israel/Palestine. The reason for this is that Israel is torn apart between the two. The US has aided
Israel countless times whilst the Israeli/Chinese relationships are growing (J-10 fighter having been developed by joint Israeli/Chinese cooperation).
Obviously, there is war in the Israeli/Palestinian borders and let's not forget that!
It should be clear as to how any WW3 may begin. The Israeli/Palestinian border dispute has been raging for years with little aggression from the
Israeli side (if Israel were to take an aggressive stance, I fear there would be no more Palestine as we know it). However, the two major events that
would spark such a war would be the Chinese invasion of Taiwan and the North Korean invasion of South Korea or vise versa (the latter being highly
doubtful as neither countries threatened to be invaded are on an offensive stance).
Now, popular among WW3 scenarios is the "nuclear armaggedon" theory. If one has nuclear capability and is on the verge of destruction by an opposing
force, what do you think one would do? Launch the nukes of course. As many of you are aware, one nuke being launched threatens an entire exchange of
nukes from all participating countries. While I will not go over nuclear capability of each nation, realize that many countries are able to hit US
soil and vise versa. There is reason to believe that NK is able to hit the western coast of the US and that China is able to nuke about 90% of US
territory if not all (I've elaborated on this
here). Evidently, Russia is able to nuke
the US at any position. However, let's not dismiss the fact that the US has many more nukes than all these opposing countries combined and the EU &
Israel also have nuclear capability.
Common amongst WW3 theorists today is the fact that if America rushes the Patriot System and the like then it will be able to fend off nuclear
attacks. Yes, I am informed that the Patriot System was a failure but let us assume that the US does come out with an anti-missile defense. In the
case of the Patriot system, the US is exhausting one "anti-nuke missile" per nuke it destroys. If the US does rush an anti-nuke system in a ever
nearing WW3, chances are it will:
1) Prove unstable and unworthy.
2) Not contain an adequate amount of "anti-nuke missiles" to power it for a reasonable amount of time. Eventually the U.S. would be "nuke
flooded."
3) Completely fail and have wasted government money.
The only capable defense in such a situation is SDI Defense but that is planned for release after another 10 years (from what I know, I don't think
there will be any major pauses that will set back this planned release)!
Now, nukes aside, let us examine the military. The US will be fighting a three front war due to its global police-like foreign policy (the fronts
being Israel/Palestine, NK/SK, China/Taiwan)! Now considering Russia's threat and if it keeps its promises as agreed by the pact created between
China/Russia then the US and her allies may be up in four fronts!
Israel has a modernized military more or less. They are capable of the destruction of Palestine although the Israeli army does not permit Israeli
soldiers to open fire unless friendly forces are under attack by an enemy army and the like.
The EU is another force with a modernized military. While Europe may not be the center of foreign influence anymore (compared to the US), Europe is
still up there with the elite. European involvement in any war these days is obviously favorable to any country (depending on Europe's siding though
lol). With France's Mirage fighters, the RAF's Sea Harriers, etc. Europe has obviously proved itself to have a capable military.
Basically, the US and her allies have similar capability due to constant US aiding. However, it is clear that the US has a far greater military than
her allies.
Now, let's take a look at the other side.
Beginning with the M. East, terrorist groups in that area have proved more than a threat to the US. Split on many fronts and combating guerilla
warfare, wouldn't US military power be weakened heavily?
Russia has a very modernized military that is just one step short from US military technology. Nevertheless, another Cold War would not be in the best
interests of the US especially with a number of their troops stationed elsewhere. Russia also has a huge supply of uranium and nukes.
China has relatively old technology but has the advantage of greater numbers. Aside from that, their navy is weak but they have a highly capable
missile defense (cruise missiles, ICBM's, IRBM's, etc.).
N. Korea has mouthed constant threats to S. Korea and the US alike. While the NK regime is weakening day by day and the population starving, one may
wonder how powerful the NK military actually is. NK is also suspected of holding nukes.
Now probably the most popular argument among these forums: the USAF F/A-22 Raptor. Now let's go back to WW2 for a moment. Germany had an all-powerful
tank: the Panzer VI Tiger II, more commonly known as the King Tiger. This tank was literally invincible for its time. 10 years later it was still a
great tank. There is no documented evidence of a King Tiger being destroyed in battle by enemy forces. However, did Nazi Germany win the war even with
such superior technology? This applies to the Raptor as well. Superior technology helps, but in the end it will not win a war for you. The King Tiger
had about a 40:0 kill ratio. My source? A quote from a King Tiger operative:
"On the road from Bollersdorf to Strausberg stood a further 11 Stalin tanks, and away on the egde of the village itself were around 120-150 enemy
tanks in the process of being refuelled and re-armed. I opened fire and destroyed first and last of the 11 Stalin tanks on the road....My own personal
score of enemy tanks destroyed in this action was 39."
King Tiger Profile
Now, I'm hearing numbers for the F-22 kill ratio to be about 10:1 to 15:1. The King Tiger's kill ratio soars above this yet Germany did not win the
war. Moreover, Germany had over 400 King Tigers produced throughout the war. Now if anyone has numbers for the amount of Raptors produced, please do
share! Although, I highly doubt the government has even 400 Raptors due to the high cost.
Now, I know I may not have covered everything but this is basically some information people should be considering. I have read many mindless, for lack
of better words, posts about U.S. dominance in the event of a war. I have nothing against the U.S. but I think some should really open up to reality.
Fighting on 3-4 fronts against opponents they are already struggling with (Middle East) and army ever declining in numbers (heck, they even advertise
commercials on TV for the US Army in hopes of recruiting more numbers) it would be unreasonable to claim that the US would so easily dominate. Only
time can tell the outcome if there in fact will be a victor although let us hope that a WW3 may never come.