It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by filosophia
What you are missing is.. The police confiscated the videos... Citing evidence.. The witnesses are not controlled by the police.. Nor is the media.. So the police could not stop them from telling their accounts..
Is it that difficult to process?
Originally posted by ADVISOR
Here is some sanity for every one, try not jumping to conclusions, over every knee jerk reaction.
FBI describes surveillance video
Posted: Jan 19, 2011 10:46 PM
Updated: Jan 20, 2011 10:00 AM
source
Looks like they did a digital recreation for the public, the evidence, is probably being combed over for the and by the prosecution.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by filosophia
You should change your title to "I realized that demanding the video, was like a child having a temper tantrum... Now I am simply arguing semantics" The end!edit on 1/21/2011 by Resurrectio because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Resurrectio
I do not know why they would even release what they have. I do not agree with them releasing ANYTHING! I don't think I or anyone else has the right to see ANYTHING to do with this case.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by filosophia
Ok so you agree that the lack of the video does NOT mean it's a cover up?
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by filosophia
Ok ... so you agree that it should not be released..
So, your not surprised that the video is NOT being released!
Your only problem is that they are releasing other evidence...
edit on 1/21/2011 by Resurrectio because: (no reason given)
Though she knew he had been arrested and impeached, she ignored his pretrial efforts to curry public favor and never saw his stint on "Celebrity Apprentice."
"I wasn't impressed with his shenanigans," she said.