posted on Jan, 18 2011 @ 06:46 PM
You can not pick apart the phrasing of a mentally ill person and assume that it means he was programmed. Mentally ill people do not think nor use
words that common, sane, everyday people use. Hence the whole 'mentally ill' thing. I had a mentally ill person in the family, and talking to him
you would think he was a government project! He always used code names for everything....used tons of technical jargon that left us all scratching
our heads...would dig up every corn field he could looking for weaponry hidden....he had his room covered in tin foil and would sit with binoculars
peeping out the blinds all night long declaring -- there they are! There was nobody there. And having known him his whole life, he was not a
government work in progress. Just mentally ill.
Regarding security, members of Congress do not travel with full-on security detail everywhere they go as far as I know. I did wonder why local police
were not present, but for all we know that could have been to show the people in her state that she was saving as much money as possible, the fact
that they have held these meetings for several years without incident, etc. There are many possibilities without claiming that this proves it
was a hit. We have many representatives meet at our local square and do campaigns, answer questions, etc....never any police present at the ones I
have attended. These are state representatives, not local town office holders.
Now, there are a few things that did struck me as being odd about this shooting.
One, I'm not sure why the doctors changed their diagnosis from the bullet entering the back of her head and exiting at a slightly elevated angle and
leaving through the front to the other way around. They are now saying, and I'm not sure why they wouldn't have known this the minute they
operated, that it was front to back. However, the gunman would have had to be standing taller than her. I was thinking that she would have been on
some kind of podium, making her taller than the crowd but I haven't seen the pictures yet. The latter added credibility to the back to front
explanation but now the doctors have changed it.
Second, I was very surprised that more was not mentioned about the Federal Judge. I guess, in the Washington heirarchy, a Congresswoman ranks above a
judge, but nonetheless I was surprised by the lack of detail regarding his death and frankly the lack of attention he got at all.
Thrid, I was surprised that he did get that many shots fired off and there are conflicting stories about when and how he was disarmed / tackled /
Fourth, don't most grocery stores have security personnel? We do here and I live in a very low crime, rural area. They are usually undercover, but
they certainly carry weapons. Some have batons, others guns. Depends.
However, none of this screams it was a hit to me. It's kind of hard to second guess how people would have or should have reacted while it was
Lastly, and this is not to take away from the tragedy it certainly is, but it seems an awful lot to go through for a false flag or a hit on a judge.
Judges have been found dead in cars, etc. Why all the hoopla this time? With the political state of our country, I should think that any agenda
trying to be carried out would have been on a grander scale. Though there were some musings in the beginning, this is hardly going to be what undoes
the Second Amendment in my opinion.
Please note: I do not consider the death of any person to be anything less than a tragedy. My words above are an attempt to analyze a situation
and remove emotion which is different than not having any emotion to begin with. My heart & prayers go out to those that perished, their friends and
family, and those still recovering.