reply to post by synchro
The article in question was written by ME, Donna Anderson (I don't mind using my real name because it's on the article anyway.)
It was NOT written by Examiner.com or by an anonymous person looking for clicks, or by a monkey or even my dog. Examiner.com does not tell me what to
write or how to write it or what opinion they want me to express.
The only reason the article was even written was because Mark Allin was on Coast to Coast that night and that's what I DO - I report on the guests
who come on C2C.
I could just as easily have trash talked this forum but instead, I came here, read some of the different threads, and honestly found it a nice place
to visit. Had I taken the other fork in the road, like a lot of unethical bloggers and content providers so often do, and taken advantage of the
connection between ATS and Loughner, I could be making some great money off of that article right now. But I don't work that way.
I could also have kept that article very short and sweet and just said that Mark Allin with ATS was a guest and JLL had posted here. But that would
also have attracted negative attention simply because I DIDN'T include any details.
I completely understand those of you who are questioning the motives, this being a conspiracy-type forum and all. But Jeez.... Can't you just accept
a compliment when one is given?