It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blupblup
How is that any different to what they've done?
Why would two adults of the same gender want to share a bed unless they were a couple?
I don't see what you're saying here.
Originally posted by blupblup
Because it gives equal rights to people whatever their sexual orientation?
Again, not getting your point.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
If the policy says nothing about sexual orientation than it's not discriminating based on sexual orientation.
People already had equal rights... a gay couple that owned a bed and breakfast could have turned my wife and I away because they catered to gay men... all that's happened is that rights have been taken away from business owners... gay and straight people already had equal rights.
Originally posted by blupblup
It says that the couple didn't want unmarried couples staying in the same bed but in the eyes of the LAW, this couple are married.
They have a civil partnership, which is the gay equivalent of a marriage.
Originally posted by blupblup
Yes but this couple don't advertise as a hetrosexual only B&B and I'm sure they couldn't do that anyway.
Originally posted by blupblup
Gay and straight people DO have equal rights.... but not in the eyes of this couple.
Originally posted by blupblup
If a straight married couple wanted to stay at this B&B and share a bed.... they can, a Gay married couple could not.... so how is that equality?
Originally posted by blupblup
reply to post by SevenBeans
Right your arguments make very little sense.
Originally posted by ScepticalBeliever
It would work the same way if the opposite occured, too. A homosexual couple couldn't turn down a heterosexual couple.
Originally posted by blupblup
Well I would imagine in that case, although I'd have to find out, that there would be some licence you would have to apply for or whatever.
For example, if you want to hire a female nurse for an elderly female patient at home, you have to apply for a licence/permission to be able to advertise for one specific gender, so as not to break the law regarding sexual discrimination.
Perhaps, and I'm not saying it IS the case.., the same applies for running a business that caters to either one gender or one sexual orientation.
A man cannot be a member of the WI right?
There are still working man's clubs where a woman cannot be a member.
There are exceptions for every rule and there are permissions to be granted.
The point is, and I really do think you're constantly missing it... is that this couple diod not have any permission, any right.... and LEGAL grounds to do what they did..... None, zilch, zip.
Originally posted by blupblup
They imposed THEIR will and THEIR beliefs ons someone else and expected them to adhere to THEIR beliefs.
You cannot do that.
Originally posted by blupblup
reply to post by SevenBeans
Court ruled in favour of the gay couple.... case is over.
Your opinion is invalid.
Originally posted by blupblup
I know... you can't start picking and choosing the types of people that you want to serve in business.
It's a very slippery slope as you say.
Some people can't see that.
Originally posted by starchild10
Originally posted by blupblup
reply to post by SevenBeans
Court ruled in favour of the gay couple.... case is over.
Your opinion is invalid.
Are you saying that because the law has decided on something, it can't be discussed? (strange opinion for someone on here to hold).
I hear that the guest house owners lost their appeal. Now I haven't a religious bone in my body but I think they were in the right. It's not as if they were providing a public/essential service. They should be allowed to turn away someone for any reason whatsoever. In their case, homosexuality is deeply repulsive to them as well as being against their religious convictions. And it's their own home as well as a private business.
Do people realise that when this business first started this couple was flooded with gay porn? That's the reality of what we are dealing with.
We are talking state interference with the way we run our lives.
Welcome to George Orwell's 1984 and the Thought Police'.
Originally posted by starchild10
Now I haven't a religious bone in my body but I think they were in the right. It's not as if they were providing a public/essential service. They should be allowed to turn away someone for any reason whatsoever. In their case, homosexuality is deeply repulsive to them as well as being against their religious convictions. And it's their own home as well as a private business.
We are talking state interference with the way we run our lives.
Welcome to George Orwell's 1984 and the Thought Police'.
Originally posted by peck420
Actually you can.
You just can't state why you are picking and choosing.
Ironic isn't it.
Most companies are savy enough to do it with BS excuses and outrageous prices. This couple was not. If anything, they learned a very valuable business lesson:
'Loose lips sink ships.'
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Right. Who knows, maybe next time they will have a lawsuit against them for having bacon and alcohol in the house while Muslims who follow Sharia Law are guests there. People never follow these things to their conclusions.
Originally posted by blupblup
Let me just repeat and make it clear here.
This Couple Broke The Law
They have now been punished accordingly.
edit on 11/2/12 by blupblup because: (no reason given)