It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Comet Elenin is coming!

page: 18
384
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 20 2011 @ 11:45 PM
link   
The Wikipedia Impact Events says that the most recent pre history impacts were the Henbury craters in Australia (~5,000 years old), and Kaali craters in Estonia (~2700 years old), apparently produced by objects which broke up before impact.
And then there's this:

TextOther ancient reports in the West are found in the writings of Pausanius, Plutarch, Livy, Pindar, Valerius Maximus, Caesar, and many others. The report of a great fall of black dust at Constantinople in 472 BC, perhaps the result of a high-altitude airburst, is documented by Procopius, Ammianus Marcellinus, Theophanes, and others. Colonel S. P. Worden has called to my attention the following passage in The History of the Franks, written by Bishop Gregory of Tours: "580 AD in Louraine, one morning before the dawning of the day, a great light was seen crossing the heavens, falling toward the east. A sound like that of a tree crashing down was heard over all the countryside, but it could surely not have been any tree, since it was heard more than fifty miles away... the city of Bordeaux was badly shaken by an earthquake ... a supernatural fire burned down villages about Bordeaux. It took hold so rapidly that houses and even threshing- floors with all their grain were burned to ashes. Since there was absolutely no other visible cause of the fire, it must have happened by divine will. The city of Orleans also burned with so great a fire that even the rich lost almost everything."

link




posted on Jan, 20 2011 @ 11:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Stargate2012
 


Yes, Indeed. I cannot tell you how many times I've wondered where the "safest" place to be is, when the "stuff " hits the fan. With the way people riot over police shootings, etc...it's no wonder the govt would want to keep something like this quiet.

I've brought it to a few friend's attention, and they look at me the same way they did when I tried to explain 9-11 to them....I guess the old saying is true....You can lead a horse to water...

Exciting stuff none-the-less.



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 12:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by C.H.U.D.
 



Cometary material on the other hand is usually no where near as dense, and in some cases of similar consistency as cigarette ash.


Really. I defy you to prove that statement in light of recent evidence.


Recent evidence?

This is what we actually know by observing meteors:


Based upon photographic fireball studies, cometary meteoroids have extremely low densities, about 0.8 grams/cc for class IIIA fireballs, and 0.3 grams/cc for class IIIB fireballs. This composition is very fragile and vaporizes so readily when entering the atmosphere, that it is called “friable” material. These meteoroids have virtually no chance of making it to the ground unless an extremely large piece of the comet enters the atmosphere, in which case it would very likely explode at some point in its flight, due to mechanical and thermal stresses.

Source: American Meteor Society FAQ

How about you showing me some supporting evidence for your assumptions? All you have provided so far is "theoretical" possibilities based on very little real knowledge of the subject. Perhaps you should consider reading up on the "old science" sources and actually seeing for yourself if they match with your own observations before you rubbish it on the basis that your electric universe theory will explain everything in the known universe instantly.

Either way, we will see in a few months time who's theory is closer to the mark. Catch you then



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 12:24 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


The Ort Cloud is quite diffuse. If Elenin hit something or a cloud of dust, it's path could change, or it could shatter into a shotgun blast of pieces. But the odds are astronomical (pun intended) that it would hit anything but minute particles.

It will come between the Sun and us. If it has a large tail it could span half of the sky. Depends on if it is rocky or ice, and what types of components.

It's surprisingly horizontal to the plain of the solar system. Hyperbolic being the term for that. Everyone should see it except maybe very polar latitudes.

No sign of it being a doomsday or Wormwood yet.

August will be a fun astronomy month.


ZG



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 12:27 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


That's the first I've heard of that comet too. Thanks for diagrams too. Well done!



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 12:46 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Well in Luke 10, it says "Satan" "as lightning falls from heaven".

A bolide can be associated with this then I think

Latin bolis, bolid-, kind of meteor, from Greek, missile, flash (of lightning)

www.thefreedictionary.com...

Tunguska was likely a bolide that hit the Earth's atmosphere. So lets say another one of these very large bolides hits above the Earth's atmosphere over Paris, or New York, or any major populated city. It would be equivalent to a nuclear bomb or even much stronger going off, also creating an EMP like effect. It could essentially cripple the entire electricity grid throughout the world perhaps for some time. Or an explosion could be thought of as a nuclear warhead going off in a major city.





posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 12:47 AM
link   
nah, i dont buy the 2012 doomsday stuff either.. but hey, i guess we will find out in a year's time...



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 01:01 AM
link   
Link to Meteorite List

If you want to know what Comet's may be made of, and especially what is known today about samples of Comet's and Meteorites on this planet, there is no better place to get this information than the famed
"meteorite-list". This message board is populated with the best of the best in meteorite science, and the archives of this list are freely available on the net. You can also join it for free, if you want tons of mail every day.... The above link shows the quality of information here. This thread post on the list by Sterling K. Webb ( read Scientist), covers this topic in great detail

Enjoy!
edit on 21-1-2011 by charlyv because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-1-2011 by charlyv because: Trouble posting the link in

edit on 21-1-2011 by charlyv because: ditto



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 01:19 AM
link   


Luke 10

The Return of the Seventy

17 ¶ And the seventy returned again with joy, saying, Lord, even the devils are subject unto us through thy name.
18 And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.

Revelation 12
6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
7 ¶ And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8 and prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

I have shown previously that Satan falls from heaven like a flash of lightning. (Bolis/Bolide =flash, lightning) at the time of the Feast of Tabernacles, as well as the beginning of the 1260 day start of the Great Tribulation.

Mat 24:27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.




Now, the good news is that the Earth's atmosphere shields us from objects that are initially below about 100 meters in size because they break-up and evaporate before reaching the ground. Still, the famous Tunguska Event in 1908 was a 50 meter stony meteor which evaporated about 20 kilometers above the Earth, and still flattened trees in a 30 kilometer area. Its yield was about 10 Megatons of TNT, and the frequency tables predict that such strikes should happen every 100 years or so. The next one could happen any day between now and 200 years from now!

The consequences of asteroidal impacts depend on the size of the asteroid. Here is a table of some possible consequences:

Size Yield Crater Effect
(Megatons) (km)
......................................................
75 m 100 1.5 Land impacts destroy area
the size of Washington or Paris)

160 m 500 3.0 Destroys large urban areas

350 m 5000 6.0 Destroys area the size of a
small state. Ocean impacts produce
tsunamis.

700 m 15,000 12 Land impact destroys Virginia,
Tiawan and ocean impact causes
major tsunami.

1.7 km 200,000 30 Land impacts affect climate,
global destruction of ozone,
tsunamis destroy coastal communities.

3.0 km 1 million 60 Large nations destroyed, widespread
fires from ejecta, climate change.

7.0 km 50 million 125 Mass extinction, global conflagration,
long term climate change.

16 km 200 million 250 Large mass extinction.



www.astronomycafe.net...

A very interesting book here:

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 03:45 AM
link   
reply to post by charlyv
 


Thank you for the link to the list. From the link you provided......


The truth is we really don't know what comets and asteroids actually are, or whether there's a real distinction between them, or if they are just keywords derived (mistakenly) from the two extremes of a continuous spectrum of bodies with every intermediate state fully represented.


Sort of vindicates my position on this and knocks the "it is made from something like cigarette ash" line. The next paragraph of that passage then basically describes elements of the Electric Universe theory where comets and asteroids are one and the same and this interchangeability is not a problem.

Again thanks!



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 03:51 AM
link   
reply to post by ZeroGhost
 



If it has a large tail it could span half of the sky. Depends on if it is rocky or ice, and what types of components.


Astronomical dogma once again. Free your mind. Comets are not, nor have they ever been, made of ice, or cigarette ash or ice-cream or anything else other than rocks/minerals!

Read/Watch about the Electric Universe



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 06:53 AM
link   
Timewave Zero- October 21 2011 is linked to 2775- 2785 B. C.

This event:

2807 BC: Suggested date for an asteroid or comet impact occurring between Africa and Antarctica, around the time of a solar eclipse on May 10, based on an analysis of flood stories. Possibly causing the Burckle crater and Fenambosy Chevron

Occurs OCTOBER 18 2011 on the graph of 2011!!!!


Numerous ancient writings from various cultures make reference to a "great flood". It has been hypothesized[5] that these legends may be associated with this event. This time period saw: a) the Indus Valley Civilization and the end of its Early Harappan Ravi Phase at ca. 2800 BC; b) the end of the pre-dynastic "antediluvian" rulers of the Sumerian civilization and the start of the First Dynasty of Kish after 2900 BC. ("After the flood had swept over, and the kingship had descended from heaven, the kingship was in Kish."); c) the pre-Xia dynasty rule of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors of China starting ca. 2850 BC (with the first two figures, Fuxi and Nuwa, as husband and wife credited with being the ancestors of humankind after a devastating flood).


edit on 21-1-2011 by Zagari because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 10:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan

Comet Elenin is coming!



Source: SOTT
www.sott.net...


It is called Elenin since it was discovered by Leonid Elenin. I expect the internet to soon be ringing with rumors and news bytes about this comet. For now, there isn't much to say so I'm sharing what I've received in private from an astronomer at a big observatory that shall remain anonymous for the moment. He says:

1. It is too early to accurately predict the future path - it's orbital parameters haven't been revised.

2. Among the observable hyperbolic and parabolic comets (those that come from the Oort cloud) this one has the smallest perihelion distance and the smallest inclination to the ecliptic plane.

3. Comet Elenin's orbit may be unstable as it may encounter some dark bodies, for example, in the asteroid belt or even some Taurid objects. What would happen in those cases is a matter of luck.

4. This comet may carry a significant amount of material with it and if it follows the currently projected orbit, the Earth may very well pass through this material.

5. If Elenin is anything like what Victor Clube or James McCanney describes, we might be in for some surprises - good or bad, who knows?


When this was first discovered in December last year it was calculated that it would pass 8.8 Au (8.8 times the distance of the Sun form us) away. Now today the orbital calculation is down to 0.24 Au with a minimum as low as 0.15. This is being re-calculated all the time and could get even closer but it depends what it encounters in the Oort belt.

The Moon is 0.00256 Au form us to give you a comparison.

You should be aware the this comet could bring debris with it and we will pass through the debris trail – if it exists – around the 6th November 2011. Could this new long period comet (?) be the origin of the stories of Nibiru?



You can look at all the technical details here: Jet Propulsion Labs small-body database browser. This also has the _javascript animation from which that image was taken.

It is definitely something to be watching out for and I shall try and keep this thread updated with information as the closest approach draws nearer.


edit on 17/1/2011 by PuterMan because: Could not make the link work


maybe this was the comet that helped wipe out the dinosaurs and only a part of it broke away and its now coming to finish us of lol



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 10:40 AM
link   
reply to post by C.H.U.D.
 



How about you showing me some supporting evidence for your assumptions? All you have provided so far is "theoretical" possibilities based on very little real knowledge of the subject. Perhaps you should consider reading up on the "old science" sources and actually seeing for yourself if they match with your own observations before you rubbish it on the basis that your electric universe theory will explain everything in the known universe instantly.


Well I will be happy to oblige, especially since you have so far shown no supporting evidence whatsoever except the usual conjecture, supposition and hypothesis so beloved of scientists everywhere when presented with something they cannot explain.

I would also point out to you that this whole thread is about "theoretical possibilities" as indeed is much of astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology.

First let us look at the one source that you did provide and see what concrete evidence we can glean.

From your source:

Most of our current knowledge about the origin of meteoroids comes from photographic fireball studies (meteors > magnitude -4) done over the last 50 years or so. This may sound like a long time, but good data has been collected on only about 800 fireballs so far. Of these, only 4 have been recovered on the ground as meteorites.


This does not sound too promising so far. Data is from photographic evidence? Does this tell you what the fireball is made of?


The similarities between asteroids and comets is made more apparent by the recent discovery of a coma (a distinctly cometary phenomena) around the asteroid Chiron, at its perihelion.


Mm. seem to be getting into difficult territory here. You state they are different. EU theory states they are the same. The two camps seem to be getting a little closer.


These parent bodies are composed of frozen methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), water (H2O), and common gases (such as carbon dioxide, CO2), carbon dust and other trace materials.


Really? Sources are absent from this piece of dogmatic prose so that cannot be verified.

Now let's take a look at a recent experiment "Deep Impact" and see if that can verify the methane/water/etc theory.

For those of you unaware of this the purpose of this mission was to basically crash a large copper projectile onto a comet and watch for the evidence of water from the ice. (Bear in mind that established science still considers comets to be 'dirty snowballs')

I will use the source below mainly because it was written before the event and serves to outline what was expected from this impact.

Deep Impact: Coming clues to the Origin of the Solar System

So, these were the expectations of the impact:


These two possibilities are strongly contrasting views of the nature of comets. But if all goes well, on 2005 July 4, we will have answers. A NASA/JPL spacecraft named Deep Impact is now on its way to Comet Tempel 1. The spacecraft carries a probe that will be released one day before encounter and will then impact the comet nucleus while the main spacecraft speeds past and photographs what happens during a critical 13-minute period. What the camera will see depends on the nature and composition of the nucleus. The anticipated possibilities are: [[viii]]

* Probe flies through comet and comes out the other side
* Probe fractures comet into thousands of pieces that fly off
* Probe enters jello-like, compression-controlled rubble pile and makes a small, deep crater
* Probe impacts on weak, gravity-controlled surface and makes a huge, medium-depth crater
* Probe vaporizes on rocky, strength-controlled surface and makes a small, shallow crater

These are listed in order of increasing strength of nucleus.


So let us take a look at the NASA site before the impact using the Intenet Archive Wayback machine

Edit: It seems that the site cannot cope with a double http address so this is the address unformatted. You should be able to get it from that. Remove the spaces. Yes this is all one line!

http:// web.archive.org/web/20050517235951/ http:// deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov/index.html


Comets and Snow Balls? Meet Dr. Don Yeomans
How are a comet and a snow ball alike? Dr. Don Yeoman's explains that and the Deep Impact mission.


Regrettably the archive does not hold the file, but one can imagine the content without too much difficulty.

This is the link on the JPL server.See if you can download and play it. One has to wonder.

OK, moving on then let us look at the archive for Thunderbolts - the home of the Electric Universe theory. That is the predictions of the EU theory set out before the mission, compared to what established science predicted.

Fiddle, altered page subsequent to the events?

No, here is a link to the page on the wayback machine


Though Deep Impact team members see this as a milestone event, advocates of the Electric Universe expect a 'shock to the system' with revolutionary implications. They say that a comet is not a primordial object left over from the formation of the solar system. Fundamentally, it is distinguishable from a rocky asteroid only by its more elliptical orbit.

In the Electric Universe a comet is a negatively charged object moving through the extensive and constant radial electric field of the positively charged Sun. A comet becomes negatively charged during its long sojourn in the outer solar system. As it speeds into the inner solar system, the increasing voltage and charge density of the plasma (solar 'wind') cause the nucleus to discharge electrically, producing the bright coma and tail.

(Sourced in the two links above on the Thunderbolts predictions.)

Please go to the page referenced now and read the sections on "Dirty snowball model" and "Electric Universe model".and then the "Electric Model Predictions For Deep Impact:" (All capitalised for all of these in the text)

Note and remember this sentence in the third part as this is particularly important:

The most obvious would be a flash (lightning-like discharge) shortly before impact.


and this one:


So, before physical impact occurs, we may expect a sudden discharge between the comet nucleus and the copper projectile. It will have the characteristic light-curve of lightning, with rapid onset and exponential decay.


You may consider that I am labouring this point to the detriment of anything else but that is not the case. There is much material on that page so you need to read it yourself as the T & C do not permit me to reproduce it here in it's entirety. I will however try and pick out the salient points.


When the impactor arrives, Thornhill considers it likely that active jets will move or switch off, since the comet's electrical field will have been suddenly disturbed. The simple thermal out-gassing model does not expect this.



Comets have flared beyond the orbit of Jupiter, even beyond the orbit of Saturn, where known icy bodies do not sublimate under solar radiation. A potentially embarrassing, ad hoc proposal has been put forward that attributes the more remote and “miraculous” outbursts to collisions with meteoric material.


In particular read and note "Jet energies and velocities."


For the electrical theorists, the answer is all too obvious. Electrical discharge accelerates material into collimated jets along the self-confining Birkeland currents that constitute the discharge arcs.


Birkland currents? Here is the Wikipedia version and the Plasma Universe version. You will find nothing to differentiate them.

I reproduce the last paragraph because it of particular importance:


Tempel 1 is a magnitude dimmer than (i.e., less than half as bright as) expected from the comet’s previous approaches to the Sun. Conventional theory has no explanation for this lower energy. The electrical model notes that the Sun is approaching the minimum in its sunspot cycle, which means that the solar electrical energy input is at a minimum. Because the comet’s brightness depends on electrical energy from the Sun’s circuit, the effect is analogous to turning down the dimmer switch on a light bulb. This lower energy level also reduces the likelihood of the more dramatic “electrical fireworks” during Deep Impact’s encounter.


So the Electric Universe theorists have set out their stall, and of course conventional astronomy expects a 'snowball'.

Taking a brief look at the expected density of the comet referenced from the first link I provided:


Density: The dirty snowball model sometimes argues for comet nucleus densities as low as 0.1 g/cc, and sometimes as high as 1.0 g/cc – the density of water or less. The satellite model indicates that comets have typical asteroid densities of 1-3 g/cc – the density of light rock. Neither the spacecraft nor the probe is expected to be able to determine this comet’s density.


In fact now would be a good time to read the remainder of that article in it's entirety.

Moving on to the 7th July 2005 now we can take a look at the archived JPL site

It is reasonably obvious that they did not expect what they saw.

The archive of the 5th July for Thunderbolts had this to say.


We also eagerly await the first pictures of the impact site, which have not been seen due to a huge surprise: The energy of the "impact" was much greater than NASA scientists had expected and-as predicted by Wallace Thornhill-was strongly reminiscent of the early Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 impact events at Jupiter. Indeed, the luminous glow that persisted occluded the impact site to a degree that shocked observers and will make it difficult to determine the size of the resulting crater through the glare. Of course, a prime aim of the experiment was to observe the crater before the spacecraft had moved out of the required position. So here we see another example of the potential cost of asking the wrong questions.


Bear in mind here C.H.U.D. that these are not my words, but the words of observers at the time.

Introducing this site where the NASA team is quoted:


1. The copper impactor generated such an energetic explosion that the primary mission sensors were swamped and the primary mission of photographing the crater was unable to be carried out. (Such a flash would be expected with a metal object approaching a highly charged object)

"We didn't expect the success of one part of the mission (bright dust cloud) to affect a second part (seeing the resultant crater). But that is part of the fun of science, to meet with the unexpected. "


Physicist Wal Thornhill commenting:

"It is now well documented that every scientist associated with the project was stunned by the scale of the energetic outburst. These scientists understood the kinetics of impact, and they all agreed that the explosion would be equivalent to 4.8 tons of TNT. That’s a good-sized bomb, but not even close to what occurred."


You really do need to read EACH of the linked materials in that article to get a proper understanding of then and now.


"Since the visible images have a higher spatial resolution, we use those images to calculate the extent of ice on Tempel 1's surface. That turns out to be a small fraction of the surface, only 0.5%. "


Er Houston we seem to have a problem here, it is not as we expected! Again you need to read all of item 7.

Then:


"There's a lot of structure on the comet, which is a bit surprising," Richardson said. "That could mean there's some strength to the comet."


I will come back to this point later.


I want you to keep in mind that the 850 lbs copper impactor that is striking the comet is basically an invisible spec in these images. It's so tiny against the huge comet that you can't even see it. As one scientist put it, "Its like a mosquito hitting a 747." The nucleus is estimated to be about 5 kilometers (3.1 miles) across and 7 (4.3 miles) kilometers tall. The detonation of the impactor is tremendous. Far greater than any model predicted (well not exactly... the electric model predicted it correctly). The impact event actually created a double flash. Two explosions took place; again, something correctly PREDICTED by the electric comet theorists. In fact all of the above observations were correctly PREDICTED by electric comet theorists. The double flash was created by an electrical discharge between the copper impactor and the comet, then the impact itself produced a flash.


And so on and so on down the list of things that the scientists did not expect to this:


Further, comets are pitch black! They are as dark as the toner in a copy machine:

"We have known for years that the surface of the earths Moon is dark -- about as reflective as an asphalt parking lot," said Robert Nelson, a project scientist on the Deep Space 1 mission at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "The nucleus of Borrelly is about half as reflective as the Moon."

Scientists call this reflectivity -- the sunlight that is not absorbed by an object -- albedo.

"I'm not sure how you get an albedo that low," said Donald Yeomans, an expert on comets and asteroids at JPL.

I CAN TELL YOU! - ITS BECAUSE THEY ARE ELECTRICALLY BURNED PIECES OF ROCK!

When you electrically burn something it turns black with soot!


After that there is a long list of further reading for those with open minds who would like to discover more of the Electric Universe/Plasma Cosmology theories.

So, what of today some 5+ years later?

Well now it has become a legacy site, so let us turn to the science page

Even after 5 years they cannot produce a coherent lie, let alone the truth. Take a look at Surface Jets and Surface Ice. Does anything strike you as odd? If not please tell me and i will explain it simply for you.

Now take interior composition and geology.

Dirty 'snowballs' do not exhibit such layering, neither are they created in high temperatures, but they need to fudge and say that this disturbed some, how did they put it, 'early solar nebula' - this despite showing a layered composition such as may be seen in geology on Earth. An obvious fudge designed to impress the gullible reader.

I would remind the readers that a nebula is defined as:


1. Astronomy
a. A diffuse mass of interstellar dust or gas or both, visible as luminous patches or areas of darkness depending on the way the mass absorbs or reflects incident radiation.
b. See galaxy.


Source: The Free Dictionary

And before you jump on me C.H.U.D. yes I am aware of Solar Nebula Disk Theory with all its suppositions, presumptions etc. however a discussion of planet formation is not the subject of this thread so that will have to be put aside for another day.

Impact Physics next. Mm, no mention now of the unexpected results and the pre-strike discharge? Only that a second or two after impact the discharge was caused by incandescent material from the comet.

Outgassing. Oops they made a mistake here. They actually say it is out gassing in an area of the comet not in sunlight. Not in the snowball theory I think. This is however covered by plasma discharge.

In fact I am not going to go on because the whole sorry page says absolutely nothing about what they found and is designed to bamboozle the ignorant with pretty graphics whilst avoiding the questions and the real science.

In a nutshell this all points to a very different composition and behaviour of this body from that which was expected, but which was predicted by the Electric Universe theory. It is also very apparent C.H.U.D that this is not made of cigarette ash. Please allow me to refresh your memory on what your source had to say:


These parent bodies are composed of frozen methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), water (H2O), and common gases (such as carbon dioxide, CO2), carbon dust and other trace materials.


Finally, on the subject of what I do and don't know about astronomy I would say this. From the age of knee high to a grasshopper my Aunt (actually a first cousin [1r]) taught me about the stars. Well whoopee, and that makes me an expert? No, it does not. I do not profess to be an expert, just an interested party. I wonder, if I tell you my Aunt's surname - Thackeray - will that ring any bells in your astronomical mind?

Possibly not, mainly because you are probably too young and American and only recently (relatively) did America discover that the place on the map marked "There be dragons" did actually contain other people! (well terrorists/communists anyway
)

Her brother, whom I knew and met obviously being a relative, was this person: David Thackeray

His instruction, on visits back to England, may have been a bit over my head at the time.

I will leave it at that.


edit on 21/1/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 01:00 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Thank you kindly. That ties together the bits very nicely, for me.

I'll have more questions i'm sure, although i'd suggest you could have a thread solely on this topic, based on your answer above.



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 03:04 PM
link   
No doubt. Soon we will lay to rest all these types of predictions at least for a short time. Or they will be fulfilled.
Let's see now, what to do? What to do ? Pay heed to warnings? Ignore warnings ? Three little pigs ?
Only 1/3 survived.

The prophecy is upon us. Will you stand alone?


edit on 21-1-2011 by randyvs because: To add vid



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 03:31 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


There is no doubt in my mind I have figured out major time codes related to the future. One being, when the Great Tribulation starts, the second being when the two witnesses, whatever they are, end their 42 months, and also the importance of the 2nd Passover.

I wouldn't be surprised that we see a major bolide hit Earth around Oct. 21st, 2011



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 04:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by ZeroGhost
 



If it has a large tail it could span half of the sky. Depends on if it is rocky or ice, and what types of components.


Astronomical dogma once again. Free your mind. Comets are not, nor have they ever been, made of ice, or cigarette ash or ice-cream or anything else other than rocks/minerals!


This is the main reason I will no longer be replying to your posts...

Earlier on in this thread I made this post, where I said:


Cometary material on the other hand is usually no where near as dense, and in some cases of similar consistency as cigarette ash.
.

Note that I said of similar consistency. I did not say comets were made of cigarette ash.

It's blatantly obvious that:

1. You either have very poor comprehension skills

and/or

2. You don't care about facts, and you have to twist other people's words around in order to further your own agenda - trying to ram electric universe crap down everybody elses throats.

Either way, there is no point wasting my time talking to you any more.

PS. I made this post for the benefit of others, so everyone can see how pointless it is trying to have a discussion with someone like you. ATS is one of the few places I know where you can offer up your time and knowledge, only to be fobbed off in a manner which basically says "F**K you".



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 05:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Stargate2012
 


Then you do not stand alone. So much irony in the term Godsmack.



posted on Jan, 21 2011 @ 05:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by C.H.U.D.

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by ZeroGhost
 



If it has a large tail it could span half of the sky. Depends on if it is rocky or ice, and what types of components.


Astronomical dogma once again. Free your mind. Comets are not, nor have they ever been, made of ice, or cigarette ash or ice-cream or anything else other than rocks/minerals!


This is the main reason I will no longer be replying to your posts...

Earlier on in this thread I made this post, where I said:


Cometary material on the other hand is usually no where near as dense, and in some cases of similar consistency as cigarette ash.
.

Note that I said of similar consistency. I did not say comets were made of cigarette ash.

It's blatantly obvious that:

1. You either have very poor comprehension skills

and/or

2. You don't care about facts, and you have to twist other people's words around in order to further your own agenda - trying to ram electric universe crap down everybody elses throats.

Either way, there is no point wasting my time talking to you any more.

PS. I made this post for the benefit of others, so everyone can see how pointless it is trying to have a discussion with someone like you. ATS is one of the few places I know where you can offer up your time and knowledge, only to be fobbed off in a manner which basically says "F**K you".


Obviously wasting your time and efforts my man.




top topics



 
384
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join