It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...sorry for my wording or spelling if any errors im in a car on my netbook right now ...
Originally posted by fallow the light
again this is an other thread that no one has pure proof of one side or an other. if we start with the fact that contrails are visual pollution and work with getting rid of them because of this, then we will be able to defeat this problem with people taking us seriously. whether or not the trails have chemicals in them does not matter when it comes to getting rid of or weakening the amount of the trails. if this is looked into and seen as a big problem by the mainstream, we will be able to have more people looking into this and get to the bottom of it all and finding out if there actually is chemicals in the trails without even mentioning chemicals. does every one see what im getting at?
sorry for my wording or spelling if any errors im in a car on my netbook right now
Fool the Emperor to Cross the Sea
Moving about in the darkness and shadows, occupying isolated places, or hiding behind screens will only attract suspicious attention. To lower an enemy's guard you must act in the open hiding your true intentions under the guise of common every day activities.
KBWI 180045Z 07010KT 3SM -SN BKN 020 OVC031 M02/M06 A3023
There is a saying: life mirrors art. Let’s go back to the original chapter we discussed. If the aerosol operations described in “Weather As a Force Multiplier” are just sci-fi, military daydreaming, then why are there charts within that document than can only be described as spray schedules? These charts tell the reader exactly which substances will be sprayed and during which years.
For instance, sensors along with smart dust (nanotechnology) will be sprayed in the skies from the time of the study, 1995, and will increase sharply until 2025.(60)
Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by Mayura
I don't know they're deniers more than (paid?) debunkers on this site. You can't deny this. You just can't. What CAN be denied though is the chemtrail motive and the contents. And DENIED is not even the proper word. Its more like 'question'.
But here's how I'm starting to see things with these debunkers especially the one that debunks every single topic here at ATS (makes you wonder why he's even a member but.....) what this person (and others do intentionally is) create a false enemy alongside a real one! This way we're fighting the false one while the real one still gets away doing what they're doing. It's pretty basic Psy-OP 101 if you ask me.
Not that there's much we can do about these chemtrails anyway but certainly, spreading the words is the least we can do and try if you will, don't respond back to these debunkers. We don't need them in our banter.edit on 17-1-2011 by Human_Alien because: grammar
Loot a Burning House
When a country is beset by internal conflicts, when disease and famine ravage the population, when corruption and crime are rampant, then it will be unable to deal with an outside threat. This is the time to attack.
And now I see when the 'contrail' argument isn't adhering -----certain people try to insult you by suggesting they're cirrus clouds (even though you watched them being sprayed from a plane). These people are insane and their on a mission. Ignore them. They want to rile you up too.