Should ATS have a History Forum?, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 16-1-2011 @ 02:51 PM by backinblack
reply to post by halfoldman



To open a topic..
History is anything that happened before today,,


reply posted on 16-1-2011 @ 03:05 PM by halfoldman
reply to post by backinblack


In one sense yeah.
But then we also have "origins" and "ancient" forums, so history is anything (not categorized on ATS) between today and what, ancient Egypt and the Neanderthals?

What about interpreting film from the History Channel that is an artifact of 2009-2010, but yet it claims to show 500 years of history?
Isn't it important to dissect the differences between e.g. Westerns and Vietnam film under Reagan, and how they change in every dispensation?
Isn't that uncovering propaganda and denying ignorance?
Isn't it strange how "Dr Quinn: Medicine Woman" had long-haired sensitive cowboys in the 1990s?
What does that suggest about the era in which it was made?
How did it change?
Or did it?
What does a "documentary" like "America: The Story of Us" include and exclude?
It's probably no coincidence, but carefully constructed.


reply posted on 16-1-2011 @ 03:07 PM by backinblack
reply to post by halfoldman



Yes but the topic 'history" is too vague..
It would need a forum split into section or it would just be a mess of everything you've noted..


reply posted on 16-1-2011 @ 03:17 PM by halfoldman
reply to post by backinblack


It could generally reflect what is current history material in academia.
How was "history" divided from the classics and social studies?
A lot of students still think history is boring.
As far as most boards/forums are not water-tight, but often a judgement call, one could say:
- the history forum covers all conspiracies since medieval times, especially in the past 500 years
- the history forum covers all writing, film, websites that purport to show an interpretation of history as propaganda material, which shows a link between the material and the power at the time of making it
Not perfect, but that's my idea.


reply posted on 16-1-2011 @ 03:32 PM by halfoldman
reply to post by andy1033


Well, the aim would be the exact opposite to learning from untruths.
It would be about questioning the received or presented "truths".
Yes, history is often written by the "winners".
Good point.



reply posted on 16-1-2011 @ 03:55 PM by halfoldman
reply to post by GirlGenius


Nice.

Wish I could Star!!!

For example, I had a book based on Channel 4 series (2006) by Tony Robinson: "The Worst Jobs in History".
en.wikipedia.org...

Now, one of the "best" jobs in medieval England was to wipe the king's butt.
If you wanted to advance politically you had to be "Master of the Stool".
That could certainly mediate posts on "filthy" foreign countries.
In fact, our imagined "cleanliness" is in no way assured - past or present.

However, I thought, "I can't post this, although it shows much on the worth of one human in relation to another.
I'll go straight to the Chit-chat forum on any board."
However, if I said:
"Neanderthals wiped chieftan's behind - new evidence!", or even "Egyptian tablets - Proof slaves wiped Tut's butt!" my speculation would remain on ATS!
But I think that merely reflects a wider channeled market.
edit on 16-1-2011 by halfoldman because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-1-2011 @ 04:55 PM by Cosmic4life
reply to post by halfoldman



I would like to see a history forum, it's the one forum ATS lacks.

History is key to many of the subjects debated here, from Avionics to politics to Industry and social structure, etc.

I think Alternative History would be a good title.

So if it's a vote then "Aye".
Pages:     ^^TOP^^