It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sardion2000
Why does the US/UN want to get involved in Sudan anyway.
Preamble
We the Peoples of the United Nations Determined
to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and
to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and
to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and
to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
And for these Ends
to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbors, and
to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and
to ensure by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and
to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples....
(The Charter of the United Nations)
Originally posted by sardion2000
BTW What type of strategic interest does Sudan hold anyway??
The Minister of Foreign Affairs said the Council of Ministers saw that the 30 days period set by the Security Council is illogical and difficult to be implemented, specially that the agreement concluded with the UN Secretary General stipulated that it should be implemented in 90 days.
"The Security Council resolution about the Darfur issue is a declaration of war on the Sudan and its people," armed forces spokesperson General Mohamed Beshir Suleiman told the official Al Anbaa daily.
"The Sudanese army is now prepared to confront the enemies of the Sudan on land, sea and air," he said.
Originally posted by Riwka
Maybe now - with U.S. leading the way - the world decided to act before it is too late.
Originally posted by Valhall
Corinthas,
I'd like to point out two things.
1. You haven't thought about this very much have you?
2. Though you seem convicted to repeat this claim over and over, I'll just point out that saying something repeatedly doesn't make it so.
This is a ludicrous, unsubstantiated, politically-driven accusation by some one who hides behind a desk and has it out for Blair----whatever!
[edit on 8-2-2004 by Valhall]
Originally posted by Valhall
No, your source mentions Blair (from the other thread that you also stated this in).
Ruwanda
Haiti
Somalia
Yugoslavia
And you are correct, I would assume that any action expects a level of return on it. Even if that return is just trying to avoid bad karma that could get on you from watching atrocities and genocide and doing nothing about it.