It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hellas
They're just shaky pics dude. Morphing...lol
Originally posted by fill0000
then how would you explain the crystal clear stars right next to it, if the camera was shaking, then every single star would be obscured.
Originally posted by Tearman
i51.tinypic.com...
Originally posted by sugarcookie1
Id like to thank the people here that have POLITELY offerd there opinion in a reasonable, civil manner..All i did was post some pics of what i saw and they are real there not moon pics or of some planet..There have been some in here that i feel have gone out of there way to be hateful ..Ive explained every thing that i could in a civil manner..Ive showed you my modified trigger or shutter and no i didnt make it i bought it.. ive also answered the questions that have been asked and the thing that bothers me the most is being called a lier and to fess up to something i am being honest to i dont think anyone needs this kind of ridicule..I love ATS this is a wonderful site all im doing is bringing something new to the table not a utube video.. and i will in the future post more pics i wont be ran out of ATS.. all im saying is cut me as little slack here and keep an open mind thanks sugar~~
Originally posted by Hellas
Originally posted by sugarcookie1
reply to post by Hellas
Believe what you will. But these pictures were taken from a tripod and not shaky at all.
I'm a Photographer and these are just shaky pics. To avoid shaky pics a tripod isn't enough. You would need a remote control to trigger the shutter, too.
Originally posted by Hellas
They're just shaky pics dude. Morphing...lol
Originally posted by Crayfish
Originally posted by fill0000
then how would you explain the crystal clear stars right next to it, if the camera was shaking, then every single star would be obscured.
Some of those are hot pixels on the camera. The ones that are stars are much dimmer and the light is not strong enough to leave a visible blur in most cases. Tearman did catch one of the stars blurring in exactly the same manner as the object of interest in this animation he made:
Originally posted by Tearman
i51.tinypic.com...
Compare the star to the left to the object, the camera movement is identical.
Nice work there Tearman.
Originally posted by Julie Washington
reply to post by ch1n1t0
I believe the date of the photo was posted earlier with the photo info:
Date Time Original = 2010-08-15 22:13:16
Date Time Digitized = 2010-08-15 22:13:16
Originally posted by SciFiSi
Originally posted by Hellas
Originally posted by sugarcookie1
reply to post by Hellas
Believe what you will. But these pictures were taken from a tripod and not shaky at all.
I'm a Photographer and these are just shaky pics. To avoid shaky pics a tripod isn't enough. You would need a remote control to trigger the shutter, too.
Hi Mr Photographer, if they are just wobbly pictures.... why aren't the stars in the background wobbly too?
Originally posted by sugarcookie1
Ok to all those that do not believe there is a modified trigger or shutter release if you want to get technical here it is. Oh and you can buy one too. Here is the link.
Modified trigger or Shutter Release for Fuji FinePix any model
This is what is attached to my camera. So please quit trying to im a liar about my equipment.