It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tooo many pills
Ariel fighter jet combat is soooo WWII.
WWIII will be fought with hypersonic cruise missiles, tipped with nuclear warheads that are capable of orbiting the Earth from space for years at a time. Then at the push of a button they will fall out of the sky directly over the targeted country and take out every important military installation before the fighter jets can even get off the ground.
Unless, they focus all of their country's energy into a single, high-powered missile defense laserbeam they wont even know what hit them or how to respond.
edit on 15-1-2011 by tooo many pills because: (no reason given)
1) Impressive as the J-20 looks (note "looks") it has had one flight.
When it enters serial production then its a much bigger issue.
The s-47 was an impressive airframe as well but never advance beyond the prototype.
According to AWST engines are an weakness.
That being said with Airbus and Boeing falling over themselves to hand the Chicom government production the technology is well within their grasp
3) In terms of Australia, even with the large size of the fighter, its unlikely that it will pose a direct threat to Australia
Originally posted by illusive man
really need to ask this
China holds what 95% of rare earth which is used in the state of the art computers and so on in the US war machine,
Originally posted by Chakotay
Back to the original post: is F35 outclassed by the Chinese prototype?
Originally posted by princeofpeace
All of it is irrelevant as the US has 10x as many nukes as China and could nuke their country to oblivion.
Originally posted by Soshh
Originally posted by princeofpeace
All of it is irrelevant as the US has 10x as many nukes as China and could nuke their country to oblivion.
Try convincing US politicians and the military establishment that all of this is irrelevant.
The US certainly could nuke China into oblivion, and so could France or the UK. If China used what “few” nukes they had against the US then you’re going to be crispy and dead no matter how many you can send back.
The idea is not to get to the stage where we're lobbing nukes at each other.
Originally posted by blackcube
Funny the americans fell threatened about this new airplane... Heck, I have a feeling that any country in the world is a threat to America in its point of view.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Actually the US has a space based missile defense system that will adequate for up to several hundred warheads...the sase number China, Israel, UK, France happen to have. Interesting number huh? Not a coincidence.
Originally posted by Soshh
Originally posted by princeofpeacewww.abovetopsecret.com...
All of it is irrelevant as the US has 10x as many nukes as China and could nuke their country to oblivion.
Try convincing US politicians and the military establishment that all of this is irrelevant.
The US certainly could nuke China into oblivion, and so could France or the UK. If China used what “few” nukes they had against the US then you’re going to be crispy and dead no matter how many you can send back.
The idea is not to get to the stage where we're lobbing nukes at each other.